· Private foundation
Loughlin Family Foundation Inc 5357-05-40
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FISHERMAN'S MARK | $8,000 |
| SOUTH SHORE CONSERVATORY | $5,000 |
| OUTDOORS FOR ALL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| DICKINSON COLLEGE | $2,000 |
| FLEMINGTON AREA FOOD PANTRY | $2,000 |
| HIGHLINE AREA FOOD BANK | $1,750 |
| TEWKSBURY FAMILY ASSISTANCE | $1,500 |
| TREEHOUSE | $1,000 |
| ORCA CONSERVANCY | $1,000 |
| YOUTH EXPERIENTIAL TRAINING | $1,000 |
| TEWKSBURY LAND TRUST | $1,000 |
| HINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $1,000 |
| HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER | $1,000 |
| THE ROTARY FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| ST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
50 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Fishermans Mark4× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +37%- EFENGINEERS FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +57%
DICKINSON COLLEGE4× · 2021–2025 · $7k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- PVPENNSWOOD VILLAGE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +40%
- CCCHRIST CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $1k
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INCone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…
To restore and protect clean water and healthy ecosystems for rivers in tennessee by employing scientific expertise and collaborative relationships to develop, promote, and support broad community stewardship and action.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…
The mission of the association is to inspire "deeper connection, better understanding, and enduring support for our public lands."
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.
Education and Research
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe in Hunterdon and the most unlike its peers is Utah Geological Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Fishermans Mark ↗
- Who funds ENGINEERS FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD ↗
- Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Outdoors for all Foundation ↗
- Who funds Flemington Area Food Pantry Inc ↗
- Who funds Youth Experiential Training Institute ↗
- Who funds HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds HIGHLINE AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds RARITAN HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DELAWARE CANAL INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PHILIPPINES HUMANITARIAN INC ↗
- Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE IN HUNTERDON ↗
- Who funds LAFAYETTE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PENNSWOOD VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORCA CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds OPEN CUPBOARD FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH GEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEACE PELOTON ↗
- Who funds SALT LAKE CLIMBERS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY UTAH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Ascend Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sad Foundation Inc · Park City Community Foundation · Promontory Foundation · Large Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Holt Foundation Im · Bloomer Family Foundation · F Cubed Foundation · Ssir Cares Inc · The Community Foundation of Utah · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Loughlin Family Foundation Inc 5357-05-40 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Raritan Headwaters Association — 94% of income from government
- Safe in Hunterdon — 51% of income from government
- 826 Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Loughlin Family Foundation Inc 5357-05-40?
Find your warmest path to Loughlin Family Foundation Inc 5357-05-40 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.