Skip to content
Loughlin Family Foundation Inc 5357-05-40 at a glance

· Private foundation

Loughlin Family Foundation Inc 5357-05-40

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$35kHuman Services$26kEnvironment$25kFood & Nutrition$20kEducation$15kRecreation & Sports$10kPhilanthropy$8kHealth$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$700
Median grant
7
States reached
$746k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FISHERMAN'S MARK$8,000
SOUTH SHORE CONSERVATORY$5,000
FLEMINGTON AREA FOOD PANTRY$2,000
OUTDOORS FOR ALL FOUNDATION$2,000
DICKINSON COLLEGE$2,000
HIGHLINE AREA FOOD BANK$1,750
TEWKSBURY FAMILY ASSISTANCE$1,500
TEWKSBURY LAND TRUST$1,000
TREEHOUSE$1,000
HINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
ORCA CONSERVANCY$1,000
THE ROTARY FOUNDATION$1,000
ST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
YOUTH EXPERIENTIAL TRAINING$1,000
HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ENGINEERS FOR A SUSTAINABLE: $4k → 11%ENGINEERS FOR A SUSTAINABLE: $3k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%ENGINEERS FOR A SUSTAINABLE: $2k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%FISHERMAN'S MARK: $8k → 4%ENGINEERS FOR A SUSTAINABLE: $1k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%FISHERMAN'S MARK: $3k → 4%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 14%FISHERMAN'S MARK: $2k → 4%FISHERMAN'S MARK: $1k → 4%FISHERMAN'S MARK: $1k → 4%FLEMINGTON AREA FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 4%FLEMINGTON AREA FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 4%FLEMINGTON AREA FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 4%FLEMINGTON AREA FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 4%FLEMINGTON AREA FOOD PANTRY: $750 → 4%SAFE IN HUNTERDON: $700 → 4%SAFE IN HUNTERDON: $500 → 4%SAFE IN HUNTERDON: $500 → 4%SAFE IN HUNTERDON: $500 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
UT
CO
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 50 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
14

Total granted

$168k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+9%

Still filing today

62%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Fishermans Mark
    4× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +93%
  • EF
    ENGINEERS FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD
    4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +57%
  • DICKINSON COLLEGE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $7k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • PV
    PENNSWOOD VILLAGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +40%
  • UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -29%
  • CC
    CHRIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
5
Harpeth Conservancy

To restore and protect clean water and healthy ecosystems for rivers in tennessee by employing scientific expertise and collaborative relationships to develop, promote, and support broad community stewardship and action.

Environment
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
8
Grand Teton Association

The mission of the association is to inspire "deeper connection, better understanding, and enduring support for our public lands."

Arts & Culture
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe in Hunterdon; the most unlike its peers is Utah Geological Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
31/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH SHORE CONSERVATORY: $26,000 · OtherSOUTH SHORE CONSERVATORYTREEHOUSE: $5,000 · OtherTEWKSBURY FAMILY ASSISTANCE: $5,000 · OtherHARVEST AGAINST HUNGER: $4,500 · OtherTEWKSBURY LAND TRUST: $4,500 · OtherTEWKSBURY LIBRARY FRIENDS: $4,250 · OtherMOUNT AMWELL PROJECT INCORPORATED: $4,200 · OtherST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherUMC FRENCHTOWN FOOD PANTRY: $3,500 · OtherYouth Experiential Training Institute: $5,000 · Other+30 more: $37,850 · Other+30 moreFishermans Mark: $14,500 · Human ServicesFishermans MarkENGINEERS FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD: $10,000 · Human ServicesENGINEERS FOR A SUSTA…Flemington Area Food Pantry Inc: $5,750 · Human ServicesFlemington Area Food …SAFE IN HUNTERDON: $2,200 · Human ServicesSAFE IN HUNTERDONAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,750 · Human ServicesRARITAN HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION: $3,100 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE DELAWARE CANAL INC: $3,000 · EnvironmentMOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $2,650 · EnvironmentHEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH: $1,450 · EnvironmentRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $500 · Environment+2 more: $550 · EnvironmentDICKINSON COLLEGE: $7,000 · EducationLAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $1,000 · EducationPARK CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $400 · Education+4 more: $650 · EducationOutdoors for all Foundation: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsSALT LAKE CLIMBERS ALLIANCE INC: $1,450 · Recreation & SportsTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $4,300 · InternationalPHILIPPINES HUMANITARIAN INC: $2,500 · InternationalOneWorld Health: $500 · InternationalHIGHLINE AREA FOOD BANK: $3,750 · Food & NutritionOPEN CUPBOARD FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,700 · Food & Nutrition
Other$103,800Human Services$34,200Environment$11,250Education$11,050Recreation & Sports$7,450International$7,300Food & Nutrition$5,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFishermans Mark: $14,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetENGINEERS FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD: $10,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOutdoors for all Foundation: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFlemington Area Food Pantry Inc: $5,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Experiential Training Institute: $5,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHARVEST AGAINST HUNGER: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $4,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLINE AREA FOOD BANK: $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRARITAN HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION: $3,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DELAWARE CANAL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $2,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPHILIPPINES HUMANITARIAN INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE IN HUNTERDON: $2,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetORCA CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSWOOD VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN CUPBOARD FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH GEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetPEACE PELOTON: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH: $1,450 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAscend Inc: $1,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSALT LAKE CLIMBERS ALLIANCE INC: $1,450 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEQUALITY UTAH FOUNDATION: $1,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CITY FILM COUNCIL: $1,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHope Alliance Public Benefit Non-Profit Corporation: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMountain Town Stages: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOneWorld Health: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT COUNTY CLUBHOUSE: $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSummit Land Conservancy: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHINGHAM LAND CONSERVATION TRUST: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budget826 BOSTON INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fishermans Mark ↗
  • Who funds ENGINEERS FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Outdoors for all Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Flemington Area Food Pantry Inc ↗
  • Who funds Youth Experiential Training Institute ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLINE AREA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds RARITAN HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DELAWARE CANAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILIPPINES HUMANITARIAN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE IN HUNTERDON ↗
  • Who funds ORCA CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PENNSWOOD VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds OPEN CUPBOARD FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH GEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEACE PELOTON ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT ALLIANCE OF UTAH ↗
  • Who funds Ascend Inc ↗
  • Who funds SALT LAKE CLIMBERS ALLIANCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sad Foundation IncPark City Community F…Promontory FoundationLarge FoundationMightycause Charitabl…PatagoniaorgHolt Foundation ImBloomer Family Founda…F Cubed FoundationSsir Cares IncThe Community Foundat…Bristol-Myers Squibb …
Sad Foundation IncUT17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sad Foundation Inc · Park City Community Foundation · Promontory Foundation · Large Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Holt Foundation Im · Bloomer Family Foundation · F Cubed Foundation · Ssir Cares Inc · The Community Foundation of Utah · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Loughlin Family Foundation Inc 5357-05-40 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Loughlin Family Foundation Inc 5357-05-40. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Raritan Headwaters Association: 94% of income from government
  • Safe in Hunterdon: 51% of income from government
  • 826 Boston Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Loughlin Family Foundation Inc 5357-05-40?

Find your warmest path to Loughlin Family Foundation Inc 5357-05-40 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Loughlin Family Foundation Inc 5357-05-40’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home