Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louchheim Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$356kEducation$305kArts & Culture$109kHuman Services$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INST$37,500
COLAB THEATER GROUP$20,000
HARMONY PROJECT$20,000
BROOKLYN YOUTH CHORUS$20,000
LEAD GUITAR$10,500
KIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS$10,000
WELLNEST$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOULDER JCC: $500 → 12%WELLNEST: $25k → 14%WELLNEST: $10k → 14%WELLNEST: $10k → 14%WELLNEST: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$752k · 11 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$752k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+10%

Still filing today

55%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    WISE READERS TO LEADERS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $101k · revenue +20%
  • RP
    READING PARTNERS
    3× · 2019–2021 · $56k · revenue +2%
  • WE
    Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • WB
    WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
  • TB
    THE BOOKS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -99%
  • CO
    CONGREGATION OR CHADASH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Applied Tinkering

Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.

Youth Development
2
Hollywood Schoolhouse Inc

Hollywood Schoolhouse knows, values, and encourages fearless curiosity. Through a blended program of innovative academics and structured learning, our diverse community inspires students to be academically strong, artistically proud,…

Education
3
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
4
The Buckley School

The buckley school is a dynamic, nurturing learning community committed to equity and inclusion. our innovative teachers and challenging programs inspire creativity, courage, and collaboration. by promoting a balanced development of mind,…

—
5
Tomorrow's Leadership Collaborative Charter School

The mission of tlc is to educate diverse students through a rigorous, standards-based, collegepreparatory program to become conscientious, caring, and responsible 21st century citizens. tlc is grounded in an inclusive vision of teaching…

—
6
The Co-op School

The mission of the co-op school is to inspire passion and teach children to become protagonists in their own educational journey by fostering their innate sense of curiosity and creativity. the co-op school facilitates joyful learning…

Education
7
Los Angeles Children's Chorus

Los angeles children's chorus provides choral music education of the highest quality to young people who represent richly diverse racial, economic, and cultural brackgrounds.

Arts & Culture
8
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
9
La's Best

La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).

Education
10
Avery Coonley School

The Avery Coonley School elevates high-achieving and gifted learners through immersion in a mutually talented community where intellect, curiosity, and creativity are enhanced by optimal challenge.

—
11
Linda Vista Children's Center

We help children discover a way of dealing with life that is realistic, comfortable, and satisfying. Self-confidence is nurtured as children learn to rely on themselves and each other. The noncompetitive environment is one that allows each…

—
12
Berkeley Hall School Foundation

Our mission is to "empower children to fulfill their unlimited, god-given potential as fearless scholars and conscientious citizens."

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Early Education; the most unlike its peers is Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INST: $305,000 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTCOMMUNITY PARTNERS FBO WRITEGIRL: $56,100 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERS FBO WRITEGIRLWRITEGIRL: $45,000 · OtherWRITEGIRLIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE: $40,000 · OtherWILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLETHE BOOKS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Other+3 more: $22,500 · OtherWISE READERS TO LEADERS: $101,100 · Youth DevelopmentWISE READERS …READING PARTNERS: $56,100 · EducationREADING PART…Harmony Project: $20,000 · EducationHarmony Proj…KIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20,000 · EducationKIPP SOCAL P…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationLEAD GUITAR: $31,500 · Arts & CultureLEAD GUIT…CO LAB THEATER GROUP INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCO LAB TH…BROOKLYN YOUTH CHORUS ACADEMY INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureBROOKLYN …Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness: $55,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human Services
Other$538,600Youth Development$101,100Education$98,100Arts & Culture$76,500Human Services$55,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWISE READERS TO LEADERS: $101,100 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $56,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWellnest Emotional Health & Wellness: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEAD GUITAR: $31,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCO LAB THEATER GROUP INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTHE BOOKS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetBROOKLYN YOUTH CHORUS ACADEMY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHarmony Project: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WISE READERS TO LEADERS ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness ↗
  • Who funds LEAD GUITAR ↗
  • Who funds CO LAB THEATER GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOOKS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN YOUTH CHORUS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds KIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson FoundationCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louchheim Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louchheim Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Louchheim Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Louchheim Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louchheim’s filings →

    More from the funding graph