Skip to content
Loomis Charitable Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Loomis Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$604k
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Animals$231kEducation$182kArts & Culture$150kHealth$115kPublic Safety & Disaster$105kReligion$99kHuman Services$92kRecreation & Sports$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $551k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGEVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$45,000
THE HIGH MUSEUM OF ART$40,000
UGA FOUNDATION$25,000
GROWING HOPE GARDENS$25,000
ANIMAL ADVOCATES OF CHATOOGA COUNTY$25,000
CANINE CELLMATES$20,000
VIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$20,000
SEASIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION$20,000
CAUCASIAN OVCHARKA RESCUE REHOME$20,000
THE RICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION$20,000
TRANSFORMATION LIFE CENTER$18,000
MARC FOUNDATION$17,000
GLOBAL EFFECT MINISTRY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CHRIST THE KING EPISCOPAL CHURCH$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS: $10k → 8%WESTONWOOD RANCH: $7k → 11%WESTONWOOD RANCH: $5k → 11%JORDAN'S HOUSE: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
PA
CA
VA
TN
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$965k · 31 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
17

Total granted

$965k
$183k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+5%

Still filing today

58%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $83k · revenue +35%
  • LA
    LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $66k · revenue +32%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $55k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • MA
    Malinois and Dutch Shepherd Rescue Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +38%
  • CJ
    CAMP JULIETTE LOW INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sandra's Rescue Pups of Swga Inc

Dog rescue

Animals
2
Boardwalk Pet Rescue

Pet rescue

Animals
3
Suwannee Valley Humane Society Inc

Spay/neuter program and care of homeless animals at shelter facility.

Animals
4
Southern Paws Animal Rescue

Animal protection and welfare

Animals
5
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
6
Animal Manor Inc

Rescue, care and placement of unwanted animals

Animals
7
Ruffus Rescue Inc

Rescue of abandoned dogs in ga

Animals
8
Paws of Dixie Animal Rescue

We are an animal rescue in the deep south

Animals
9
Florida Rottleiler Rescure Ranch

Provides a sanctuary for abused,medical

Animals
10
Wildlife Rescue

Wildlife rescue

Animals
11
Wynnwood Wildlife Rehab

We take in all orphaned and injured wildlife We rehab them and return them to the wild where they belong

Animals
12
Friends of Homeless Animals of Southern California

To help, heal and save homeless animals

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Volunteer Health Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caucasian Ovcharka Rescue Rehome. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
23/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANINE CELLMATES: $40,000 · OtherCANINE CELLMATESVIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $37,500 · OtherVIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOLTHE RICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherFIRST STEPS TO FREEDOM: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherPREVENT CHILD ABUSE ROCKDALE I DBA POSITIVE CHILDHOOD ALLIANCE: $30,000 · OtherTHE PRESCHOOL AT PEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $28,000 · OtherCHRIST THE KING EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherGROWING HOPE GARDENS: $25,000 · OtherGlobal Effect Ministry Inc: $32,100 · Other+29 more: $334,500 · Other+29 moreLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $66,253 · AnimalsLIFELINE ANIMAL …ANIMAL ADVOCATES OF CHATTOOGA COUNTY INC: $50,000 · AnimalsANIMAL ADVOCATES…CAUCASIAN OVCHARKA RESCUE REHOME: $44,949 · AnimalsCAUCASIAN OVCHAR…Malinois and Dutch Shepherd Rescue Inc: $20,000 · AnimalsMalinois and Dut…+1 more: $5,000 · AnimalsROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $83,000 · Arts & CultureROBERT W W…HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY: $15,500 · Arts & CultureHERITAGE F…PARADISE GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & CulturePARADISE G…MACON ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $3,500 · Arts & CultureTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationTHE UNIVE…THE SEASIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationTHE SEASI…WOODWARD ACADEMY INC: $17,500 · EducationWOODWARD …UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…+1 more: $1,250 · EducationMarc Foundation Inc: $33,000 · PhilanthropyBridgeville Community Center: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ALYS FOUNDATIONINC: $22,000 · PhilanthropyBRIDGEVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $75,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPoint Washington Medical Clinic Inc: $25,000 · HealthCHILDRENS VOLUNTEER HEALTH NETWORK INC: $19,000 · HealthSADDLE UP: $17,000 · HealthREINS OF HOPE INC: $5,000 · Health
Other$669,100Animals$186,202Arts & Culture$122,000Education$103,750Philanthropy$80,000Public Safety & Disaster$75,000Health$66,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $83,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT: $75,000 over 2y, 58% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $66,253 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL ADVOCATES OF CHATTOOGA COUNTY INC: $50,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetMarc Foundation Inc: $33,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetGlobal Effect Ministry Inc: $32,100 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE ROCKDALE I DBA POSITIVE CHILDHOOD ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetPoint Washington Medical Clinic Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGROWING HOPE GARDENS: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetBridgeville Community Center: $25,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetTHE ALYS FOUNDATIONINC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGEORGIA STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SEASIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMalinois and Dutch Shepherd Rescue Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCAMP JULIETTE LOW INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCHILDRENS VOLUNTEER HEALTH NETWORK INC: $19,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTRANSFORMATION LIFE CENTER: $18,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetWOODWARD ACADEMY INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSADDLE UP: $17,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHERITAGE FOUNDATION OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY: $15,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPARADISE GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMomentous Institute: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILD SOULS RANCH: $13,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWESTONWOOD RANCH INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAnimal Assisted Happiness Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORTUNA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetNOKUSE EDUCATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDESTIN CHARITY WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD PALS RESCUE: $5,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetPARK PRIDE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREINS OF HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetMACON ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetANDREW JACKSON FOUNDATION FKA LADIES' HERMITAGE ASSOCIATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSandpiper Boosters Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DUNES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP KUDZU INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Loomis Foundation IncThe Alys FoundationincThe St Joe Community …Humboldt Area Foundat…The Community Foundat…Raymond James Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…Natl Christian Charit…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Network for Good
Loomis Foundation IncKS36.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Loomis Foundation Inc · The Alys Foundationinc · The St Joe Community Foundation Inc · Humboldt Area Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Loomis Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Loomis Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Loomis Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Loomis Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Loomis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home