Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Loomis Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$604k
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.

Animals$231kEducation$182kArts & Culture$150kHealth$115kPublic Safety & Disaster$105kReligion$99kHuman Services$92kRecreation & Sports$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $551k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGEVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$45,000
THE HIGH MUSEUM OF ART$40,000
GROWING HOPE GARDENS$25,000
UGA FOUNDATION$25,000
ANIMAL ADVOCATES OF CHATOOGA COUNTY$25,000
CANINE CELLMATES$20,000
CAUCASIAN OVCHARKA RESCUE REHOME$20,000
SEASIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION$20,000
VIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$20,000
THE RICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION$20,000
TRANSFORMATION LIFE CENTER$18,000
MARC FOUNDATION$17,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
BRIDGEVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS: $10k → 8%WESTONWOOD RANCH: $7k → 11%WESTONWOOD RANCH: $5k → 11%JORDAN'S HOUSE: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
PA
CA
VA
TN
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$965k · 31 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
17

Total granted

$965k
$183k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+5%

Still filing today

58%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RW
    ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $83k · revenue +35%
  • LA
    LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $66k · revenue +32%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $55k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • CJ
    CAMP JULIETTE LOW INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +10%
  • MA
    Malinois and Dutch Shepherd Rescue Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sandra's Rescue Pups of Swga Inc

Dog rescue

Animals
2
Boardwalk Pet Rescue

Pet rescue

Animals
3
Suwannee Valley Humane Society Inc

Spay/neuter program and care of homeless animals at shelter facility.

Animals
4
Southern Paws Animal Rescue

Animal protection and welfare

Animals
5
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
6
Animal Manor Inc

Rescue, care and placement of unwanted animals

Animals
7
Ruffus Rescue Inc

Rescue of abandoned dogs in ga

Animals
8
Paws of Dixie Animal Rescue

We are an animal rescue in the deep south

Animals
9
Florida Rottleiler Rescure Ranch

Provides a sanctuary for abused,medical

Animals
10
Wildlife Rescue

Wildlife rescue

Animals
11
Wynnwood Wildlife Rehab

We take in all orphaned and injured wildlife We rehab them and return them to the wild where they belong

Animals
12
Friends of Homeless Animals of Southern California

To help, heal and save homeless animals

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Volunteer Health Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Caucasian Ovcharka Rescue Rehome. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsSenior Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Cancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsChristian Youth CampsEquine Therapy ProgramsAnimal Rescue and Shelter
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%2%<5yr17%14%5–10yr20%38%10–20yr14%14%20–35yr9%10%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%1%<5yr17%14%5–10yr20%35%10–20yr14%18%20–35yr9%4%35–55yr13%28%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,256

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
22/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CANINE CELLMATES — $40,000 · OtherCANINE CELLMATESVIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $37,500 · OtherVIRGINIA EPISCOPAL SCHOOLTHE RICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherFIRST STEPS TO FREEDOM — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherPREVENT CHILD ABUSE ROCKDALE I DBA POSITIVE CHILDHOOD ALLIANCE — $30,000 · OtherTHE PRESCHOOL AT PEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $28,000 · OtherCHRIST THE KING EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherGROWING HOPE GARDENS — $25,000 · OtherGlobal Effect Ministry Inc — $32,100 · Other+29 more — $334,500 · Other+29 moreLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC — $66,253 · AnimalsLIFELINE ANIMAL …ANIMAL ADVOCATES OF CHATTOOGA COUNTY INC — $50,000 · AnimalsANIMAL ADVOCATES…CAUCASIAN OVCHARKA RESCUE REHOME — $44,949 · AnimalsCAUCASIAN OVCHAR…Malinois and Dutch Shepherd Rescue Inc — $20,000 · AnimalsMalinois and Dut…+1 more — $5,000 · AnimalsROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $83,000 · Arts & CultureROBERT W W…HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY — $15,500 · Arts & CultureHERITAGE F…PARADISE GARDEN FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Arts & CulturePARADISE G…MACON ARTS ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $3,500 · Arts & CultureTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $55,000 · EducationTHE UNIVE…THE SEASIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · EducationTHE SEASI…WOODWARD ACADEMY INC — $17,500 · EducationWOODWARD …UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH — $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…+1 more — $1,250 · EducationMarc Foundation Inc — $33,000 · PhilanthropyBridgeville Community Center — $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ALYS FOUNDATIONINC — $22,000 · PhilanthropyBRIDGEVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $75,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPoint Washington Medical Clinic Inc — $25,000 · HealthCHILDRENS VOLUNTEER HEALTH NETWORK INC — $19,000 · HealthSADDLE UP — $17,000 · HealthREINS OF HOPE INC — $5,000 · Health
Other$669,100Animals$186,202Arts & Culture$122,000Education$103,750Philanthropy$80,000Public Safety & Disaster$75,000Health$66,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC — $83,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $75,000 over 2y, 58% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC — $66,253 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL ADVOCATES OF CHATTOOGA COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetMarc Foundation Inc — $33,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetGlobal Effect Ministry Inc — $32,100 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE ROCKDALE I DBA POSITIVE CHILDHOOD ALLIANCE — $30,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetGROWING HOPE GARDENS — $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetBridgeville Community Center — $25,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetPoint Washington Medical Clinic Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE ALYS FOUNDATIONINC — $22,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SEASIDE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCAMP JULIETTE LOW INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGEORGIA STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMalinois and Dutch Shepherd Rescue Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCHILDRENS VOLUNTEER HEALTH NETWORK INC — $19,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTRANSFORMATION LIFE CENTER — $18,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetWOODWARD ACADEMY INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSADDLE UP — $17,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHERITAGE FOUNDATION OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY — $15,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMomentous Institute — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARADISE GARDEN FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWILD SOULS RANCH — $13,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWESTONWOOD RANCH INC — $11,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFORTUNA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetDESTIN CHARITY WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Assisted Happiness Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOKUSE EDUCATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetREINS OF HOPE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetREDWOOD PALS RESCUE — $5,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetMACON ARTS ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPARK PRIDE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANDREW JACKSON FOUNDATION FKA LADIES' HERMITAGE ASSOCIATION — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSandpiper Boosters Inc — $1,250 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DUNES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP KUDZU INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Loomis Foundation IncThe Alys FoundationincThe St Joe Community …Humboldt Area Foundat…The Community Foundat…Raymond James Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…Natl Christian Charit…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Network for Good
Loomis Foundation IncKS36.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Loomis Foundation Inc · The Alys Foundationinc · The St Joe Community Foundation Inc · Humboldt Area Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Loomis Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Loomis Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Loomis Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines