Skip to content
Loma Linda University Medical Center at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Loma Linda University Medical Center

Our mission is to continue the healing ministry of jesus christ, "to make man whole," in a setting of advancing medical science and to provide a stimulating clinical and research environment for the education of physicians, nurses, and other health professionals.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$2.7MReligion$1.3MHuman Services$100kFood & Nutrition$65kRecreation & Sports$43kCommunity Improvement$33kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $222,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,621,103 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,398,603 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $213k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTHCARE IN ACTION INC$40,000
MARYS MERCY CENTER$40,000
FOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC$25,000
WHOLE PERSON CARE CLINIC$25,000
ROLLING BEARS WHEELCHAIR ATHLETIC ASSOC$22,500
SYMBA CENTER$20,000
BENJAMIN E JONES COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$15,000
FIRST COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC$15,000
INLAND EMPIRE DISABILITIES COLLABORATIVE$10,000
CALIF BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$5,000
LA SIERRA UNIVERSITY OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $42k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 10 repeat orgs$305k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$4.0M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+2%

Still filing today

70%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $190k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationFood & NutritionInternationalCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SAC HEALTH SYSTEM
    3× · 2018–2020 · $2.3M · revenue +250%
  • AH
    Adventist Health Policy Association Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $175k · revenue +35%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    2× · 2018–2020 · $60k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $42k · revenue 0%
  • ML
    MISCELLANEOUS LESS THAN 5000 & OTHER ADJUSTMENTS
    one grant, 2018 · $16k
  • RB
    ROLLING BEARS WHEELCHAIR ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIION
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
2
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
3
California Chronic Care Coalition

To improve the health care system where all Californians can access appropriate, affordable, quality health care through education and collaboration with all branches of government and key stakeholders to re-design a system of care

Human Services
4
Integrated Healthcare Association

Iha's mission is to bring the healthcare community together to solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care. as a non-profit industry association, we use objective data, our decades of expertise, and our unique…

—
5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
Hospital Quality Institute

To advance and accelerate patient safety and quality improvement for coordinated statewide impact, with aims to achieve zero defects, optimize clinical effectiveness, and enhance patient and family experience in health care.

Human Services
7
Hospital Council of N & C California

To provide membership services, local level issue management, education, shared services, research, media support & consultation to northern california hospitals.

—
8
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
9
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
10
Emanate Health Medical Center

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
11
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
12
Health Center Partners of Southern California

Health center partners of southern california (formerly: council of community clinics) ("hcp") was established in 1977 as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.a premier consortium of primary healthcare organizations, hcp is an advocate for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Southern California; the most unlike its peers is Redlands Bicycle Classic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAC HEALTH SYSTEM: $2,285,208 · HealthSAC HEALTH SYSTEM+3 more: $115,100 · HealthLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHURCH OF SDAS: $755,000 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHURCH OF SDASLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SDA CHURCH: $562,500 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SDA CHURCHRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $60,000 · Other+14 more: $154,679 · Other+14 moreAdventist Health Policy Association Inc: $175,259 · Community ImprovementMary's Mercy Center: $40,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionCalifornia Fire Chiefs EMS Fire and Education Foundation: $30,000 · EducationInland Empire Disabilities Collaborative: $20,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $41,752 · Human ServicesFirst Community Capital Inc: $15,000 · Employment
Health$2,400,308Other$1,532,179Community Improvement$175,259Food & Nutrition$65,000Education$55,000Human Services$41,752Employment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAC HEALTH SYSTEM: $2,285,208 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetAdventist Health Policy Association Inc: $175,259 over 2y, 18% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRiverside University Health System Foundation: $55,100 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $41,752 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMary's Mercy Center: $40,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCalifornia Fire Chiefs EMS Fire and Education Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHOLE PERSON CARE CLINIC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetInland Empire Disabilities Collaborative: $20,000 over 2y, 51% of budgetFirst Community Capital Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBANNING CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,600 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetARTSCONNECTION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAUMONT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $630 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $523 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Communi…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Loma Linda University…Arrowhead United WayCalifornia Healthcare…California Community …Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Inland Empire Community FoundationCA21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc · Arrowhead United Way · California Healthcare Foundation · California Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Loma Linda University Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Loma Linda University Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Loma Linda University Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home