Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc

To participate in christ's ministry of health, healing, and wholeness for: education, healthcare, and research by providing support to the lluh entities.

$923k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SHARED SERVICES INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $261k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $655k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$268M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOMA LINDA ACADEMY$125,000
HEALTH CAREER CONNECTION$95,850
EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER$63,818
MAKING HOPE HAPPEN FOUNDATION$60,000
FOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC$55,000
CHILD ADVOCATES CASA OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY$55,000
SYMBA CENTER$50,000
CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC$50,000
DIVERSITY UPLIFTS INC$50,000
FIRST COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC$50,000
BENJAMIN E JONES COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$40,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TEMECULA VALLEY$36,000
CHILDRENS FUND INC$30,000
INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP$26,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OC AND IE INC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $696k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $131k → 14%SANKOFA BIRTHWORKERS COLLECTIVE OF THE INLAND EMPIRE: $24k → 11%CHILDRENS FUND INC: $30k → 14%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $100k → 14%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $88k → 14%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $87k → 14%GREATER HOPE FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $25k → 14%GREATER HOPE FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $7k → 14%VICTOR VALLEY FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $70k → 14%VICTOR VALLEY FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $60k → 14%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $64k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.5M · 25 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
31

Total granted

$4.5M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+10%

Still filing today

88%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    Making Hope Happen Foundation
    6× · 2019–2025 · $465k · revenue +13%
  • HC
    HEALTH CAREER CONNECTION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $436k · revenue +565%
  • EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $339k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • SA
    SOCIAL ACTION COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEM
    one grant, 2018 · $1.2M
  • SH
    SAC HEALTH SYSTEMgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $953k · revenue +199%
  • CO
    CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO COMM DEV & HOUSING
    one grant, 2024 · $71k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
3
Community Health Association Inland Southern Region

We exist to support our membership and community parnters to ensure acessible high-quality, and cost-effictve health services.

—
4
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
5
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
6
Laguna Beach Community Clinic

The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
7
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
8
La Clinica Del Valle Family Health Care Center Inc

La clinica provides primary and preventive medical, dental, behavioral health, and other health promotion services to underserved and low-income patients.

—
9
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
10
Physicians for a Healthy California

Physicians for a Healthy California is dedicated to improving community health, growing a diverse physician workforce and promoting health equity. Our programs continue to improve public health, provide clinical practice support and…

Health
11
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Lifting Communities and the most unlike its peers is San Bernardino Valley Concert Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEarly Childhood Care CentersChild & Family Mental Healt…Local Business Advocacy Org…Performing Arts Organizatio…Buddhist & Eastern Religiou…Christian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%4%<5yr16%10%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr9%27%35–55yr12%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%6%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr17%41%20–35yr9%12%35–55yr12%35%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/56
the rest of the field
16%
12,712/80,408

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
32/50
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LOMA LINDA ACADEMY — $1,276,056 · OtherLOMA LINDA ACADEMYSOCIAL ACTION COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEM (SACH) — $1,217,243 · OtherSOCIAL ACTION COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEM (SACH)Making Hope Happen Foundation — $465,000 · OtherMaking Hope Happen FoundationBENJAMIN E JONES COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $226,000 · OtherBENJAMIN E JONES COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER+30 more — $861,496 · Other+30 moreSAC HEALTH SYSTEM — $952,509 · HealthSAC HEALTH SYSTEMHEALTH CAREER CONNECTION INC — $435,850 · HealthHEALTH CAREER CONNECTION INCSYMBA CENTER — $165,000 · HealthSYMBA CENTERDIVERSITY UPLIFTS INC — $100,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $65,000 · Health+13 more — $192,500 · Health+13 moreEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $338,689 · Human ServicesEL SOL NEI…CHILDREN'S FUND INC — $161,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S…Victor Valley Family Resource Center — $130,000 · Human ServicesVictor Val…GREATER HOPE FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC — $56,500 · Human ServicesGREATER HO…Sankofa Birthworkers Collective of the Inland Empire — $24,400 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC — $312,480 · Food & NutritionMary's Mercy Center — $50,000 · Food & NutritionLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY — $305,505 · EducationPATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES — $211,500 · ReligionFirst Community Capital Inc — $50,000 · EmploymentCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC — $50,000 · Employment
Other$4,045,795Health$1,910,859Human Services$720,589Food & Nutrition$362,480Education$305,505Religion$211,500Employment$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAC HEALTH SYSTEM — $952,509 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMaking Hope Happen Foundation — $465,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetHEALTH CAREER CONNECTION INC — $435,850 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $338,689 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC — $312,480 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY — $305,505 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPATH OF LIFE MINISTRIES — $211,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetSYMBA CENTER — $165,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S FUND INC — $161,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetVictor Valley Family Resource Center — $130,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY — $105,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHRIFTING 4 GIFTING — $72,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER HOPE FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC — $56,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFirst Community Capital Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMary's Mercy Center — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetREDLANDS COMMUNITY MUSIC ASSOCIATION — $40,800 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetANAHEIM DUCKS FOUNDATION — $37,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSAN BERNARDINO VALLEY CONCERT ASSOCIATION — $35,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetREDLANDS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $35,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetLoma Linda University Health Care — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAP Health Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES LIFTING COMMUNITIES — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAdventist Health SystemWest — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSankofa Birthworkers Collective of the Inland Empire — $24,400 over 1y, 29% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation — $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAssociates of the Redlands Bowl Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetArrowhead United Way — $18,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPARKVIEW LEGACY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF TEMECULA FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetAssociation of Fundraising Professionals Desert Communities Chapter — $14,500 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetSan Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce — $14,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-AFRICAN ACADEMY OF CHRISTIAN SURGEONS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGlendale Adventist Medical Center Fdtn Adventist Health Glendale Foundation — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACHE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGREATER RIVERSIDE CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE — $8,940 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMcCallum Theatre Foundation Inc — $5,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS SAN FERNANDO VALLEY — $5,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Communi…Kaiser Foundation Hos…IEHP FoundationThe California Endowm…Loma Linda University…Arrowhead United WayCalifornia Healthcare…California Community …Dignity HealthLoma Linda UniversityWeingart FoundationThe California Wellne…
Inland Empire Community FoundationCA45.6× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · IEHP Foundation · The California Endowment · Loma Linda University Medical Center · Arrowhead United Way · California Healthcare Foundation · California Community Foundation · Dignity Health · Loma Linda University · Weingart Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines