Skip to content

· Private foundation

Little Lamp of Jesus

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$126kHealth$39kReligion$24kFood & Nutrition$21kHousing & Shelter$20kCivil Rights$7kHuman Services$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$5,029
Median grant
5
States reached
$250k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Doctors without Borders$29,500
Covenant House$10,500
Individual grant recipient$8,100
Homeless and Destitutes$5,029
Brothers of Mercy$4,502
Immaculate Conception$650
CRS$500
St Jude Childrens Research$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 80% of grant dollars ($199k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 20% that went abroad ($50k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%World Food Program USA: $500 → 14%Covenant House: $11k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
IN
OH
NJ
CA
NE
MO
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 20% of all-years giving ($50k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Afghanistan$21k · 4 grants
Kenya$19k · 1 grant
Philippines$10k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Little Lamp of Jesus’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 15% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 12%.

Little Lamp of Jesuslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 27% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$200k · 26 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
24

Total granted

$200k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+12%

Still filing today

38%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +39%
  • HO
    HOPE OF THE WORLD
    3× · 2020–2022 · $6k · revenue +43%
  • TC
    THE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND
    3× · 2020–2022 · $6k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • MO
    MISSIONARIES OF CHARITY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
4
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
7
Aid for Starving Children

Aid For Starving Children provides assistance around the world to children and their families by providing food, shelter, clean water, financial assistance, education, and emergency relief to victims of famine, natural disasters, and war.

International
8
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

—
9
Globus Relief

The mission of globus relief is to improve the delivery of healthcare worldwide by gathering, processing and distributing surplus medical and health supplies to charities at home and abroad.

International
10
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
11
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
12
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy-Usa for Aid & Developmentinc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rise Up Society: $38,136 · OtherRise Up SocietyBrothers of Mercy of St John: $20,010 · OtherBrothers of Mercy of St JohnBrothers of Mercy: $14,506 · OtherBrothers of MercyHomeless and Destitutes: $12,965 · OtherHomeless and DestitutesIndividual grant recipient: $8,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPanhandlers and homeless: $6,928 · OtherHOPE OF THE WORLD: $6,200 · OtherMisericordia: $5,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,400 · Other+23 more: $32,770 · Other+23 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $47,880 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND: $6,000 · InternationalTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUNDORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC: $4,350 · InternationalORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INCMERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINC: $4,050 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $3,250 · International+12 more: $12,450 · International+12 moreCOVENANT HOUSE: $10,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $500 · Human ServicesYOUTH WITH A MISSION GLEANINGS FOR THE HUNGRY: $3,550 · ReligionCOALITION FOR CANCELED PRIESTS: $2,600 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,650 · ReligionLOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES FOUNDATION: $700 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $650 · Health
Other$150,665International$77,980Human Services$11,000Religion$7,800Health$1,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $47,880 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE OF THE WORLD: $6,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC: $4,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINC: $4,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH WITH A MISSION GLEANINGS FOR THE HUNGRY: $3,550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR CANCELED PRIESTS: $2,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKids Alive International Inc: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $1,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAP International Inc: $1,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES FOUNDATION: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE OF THE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds ORPHAN GRAIN TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION GLEANINGS FOR THE HUNGRY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR CANCELED PRIESTS ↗
  • Who funds Kids Alive International Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVE WITHOUT BOUNDARIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC12.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Little Lamp of Jesus funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Little Lamp of Jesus. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Little Lamp of Jesus?

Find your warmest path to Little Lamp of Jesus through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Little Lamp of Jesus’ filings →

More from the funding graph