Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lindsay & Alex Ramsay Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$406kHealth$64kInternational$55kYouth Development$39kHuman Services$24kAnimals$12kHousing & Shelter$6kScience & Tech$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CAREY SCHOOL$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA$15,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$5,000
THE CAREY SCHOOL$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$5,000
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$5,000
THE GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION$2,500
CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL$2,000
GROTON SCHOOL$2,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,000
DELTA WATERFOWL FOUNDATION$500
CALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION$500
CALIFORNIA TROUT$500
PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PARCA PARTNERS AND ADVOCATES FOR REMARKABLE CHILDREN AND ADULTS: $5k → 7%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%THE GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%PARCA PARTNERS AND ADVOCATES FOR REMARKABLE CHILDREN AND ADULTS: $1k → 7%PARCA PARTNERS AND ADVOCATES FOR REMARKABLE CHILDREN AND ADULTS: $1k → 7%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ND
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 18% of Lindsay & Alex Ramsay Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 77% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Lindsay & Alex Ramsay Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$540k · 31 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
7

Total granted

$540k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-6%

Still filing today

68%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CAREY SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $216k · revenue +100%
  • TP
    TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $55k · revenue +18%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA
    2× · 2021–2024 · $16k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • PT
    PENINSULA TEMPLE SHOLOM
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • EC
    EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +7%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
4
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
5
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
6
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

7
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
12
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of San Francisco and the most unlike its peers is California Waterfowl Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Veteran Support ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsChild and Family ServicesChristian Youth CampsIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr13%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr11%50%35–55yr13%20%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,944

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CAREY SCHOOL — $216,350 · OtherTHE CAREY SCHOOLTHE LITTLE SCHOOL (ENORMOUS CHANGES INC CA DBA) — $48,679 · OtherTHE LITTLE SCHOOL (ENORMOUS CHANGES INC CA DBA)UC REGENTS - UCSF — $20,000 · OtherUC REGENTS - UCSFYALE UNIVERSITY — $15,500 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY — $13,000 · Other+17 more — $39,250 · Other+17 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $28,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVE…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFOR…GROTON SCHOOL — $14,500 · EducationGROTON SCHOOLCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL — $14,500 · EducationCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLAN…+2 more — $3,000 · EducationTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $55,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING PO…MONTEREY PENINSULA FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyHypopara Research Foundation — $20,000 · HealthMILLS-PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthPENINSULA FAMILY CONNECTIONS — $3,500 · HealthPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC — $2,000 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthGOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS AND ADVOCATES FOR REMARKABLE CHILDREN AND ADULTS — $9,500 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $6,250 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentFOUR WINDS — $11,750 · Recreation & SportsSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$352,779Education$120,000Philanthropy$57,000Health$36,500Human Services$25,750Youth Development$17,500Recreation & Sports$12,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CAREY SCHOOL — $216,350 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $28,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHypopara Research Foundation — $20,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGROTON SCHOOL — $14,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL — $14,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOUR WINDS — $11,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMILLS-PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS AND ADVOCATES FOR REMARKABLE CHILDREN AND ADULTS — $9,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $6,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCURIODYSSEY — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION — $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA FAMILY CONNECTIONS — $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOACHING CORPS — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA TROUT INC — $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY PENINSULA FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Carol Emmott Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CAREY SCHOOL
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds Hypopara Research Foundation
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA
  • Who funds GROTON SCHOOL
  • Who funds CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL
  • Who funds FOUR WINDS
  • Who funds GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MILLS-PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PARTNERS AND ADVOCATES FOR REMARKABLE CHILDREN AND ADULTS
  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC
  • Who funds CURIODYSSEY
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds PENINSULA FAMILY CONNECTIONS
  • Who funds COACHING CORPS
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA TROUT INC
  • Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC
  • Who funds POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE
  • Who funds MONTEREY PENINSULA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
  • Who funds The Carol Emmott Foundation
  • Who funds BAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA23.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Greene Van Arsdale Foundation co KKR Accounting Services LLC · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Marin Community Foundation · Ramsay Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Hoefer Family Foundation · The William G Irwin Charity Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lindsay & Alex Ramsay Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 46%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc46% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lindsay & Alex Ramsay Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lindsay & Alex Ramsay Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph