Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lillehei Family Charitable Foundation Agency

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$237k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$591kArts & Culture$466kHealth$78kHuman Services$68kEmployment$39kHousing & Shelter$30kFood & Nutrition$13kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $135k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MN FOUNDATION$135,000
BRIGHTER DAYS GRIEF CTR$12,500
BAKKEN MUSEUM$12,000
CRESCENT COVE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$10,000
NEW HOPE PERU$10,000
TEAM HEART INC$10,000
Sky High Hope Camp$10,000
Agate Housing and Services$10,000
MAGNUM CHORUM$10,000
THE LIFT GARAGE$5,000
Thanksgiving Meals On Wheels Inc$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BRIGHTER DAYS GRIEF CTR: $5k → 11%BRIGHTER DAYS GRIEF CTR: $5k → 11%BRIGHTER DAYS GRIEF CTR: $5k → 11%BRIGHTER DAYS GRIEF CTR: $5k → 11%BRIGHTER DAYS GRIEF CTR: $5k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $5k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $5k → 11%BRIGHTER DAYS GRIEF CTR: $13k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 12 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$1.3M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+3%

Still filing today

92%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesEmploymentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $485k · revenue +137%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2025 · $106k · revenue +76%
  • MC
    MAGNUM CHORUM
    4× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +209%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • NR
    NEUROSURGERY RESEARCH & EDUCATION FNDT
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • TW
    THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Hope for the Heart
—
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Children's Cancer Research Fund

Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.

Philanthropy
7
Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
8
Hospice of Metro Denver Inc

To encircle those facing advanced illness with unprecedented levels of comfort, compassion, and expertise.

Human Services
9
Assumption Home Inc

We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…

Human Services
10
The Nebraska Medical Center

The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC)'s mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health
11
CaringBridge

CaringBridge has a single vision: a world where no one goes through a health journey alone. In order to turn this vision into reality, we've made it our mission to build bridges of care and communication providing love and support on a…

Health
12
Child Loss Foundation

The child loss foundation continues to expand its reach and strives to be a nationally recognized leader in providing comprehensive support to parents grieving the death of a child through retreats, financial assistance and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is New Hope Childrens Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $485,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $105,774 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONTHE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $385,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTETHE BAKKEN: $41,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BAKKENMAGNUM CHORUM: $40,000 · Arts & CultureMAGNUM CHORUMBRIGHTER DAYS FAMILY GRIEF CENTER: $37,500 · Human ServicesCRESCENT COVE: $30,000 · Human ServicesTeam Heart Inc: $35,000 · HealthSKY HIGH HOPE CAMP: $26,000 · HealthA Breath of Hope Lung Foundation: $5,000 · HealthThe Lift Garage: $39,000 · EmploymentTHANKSGIVING MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherNEUROSURGERY RESEARCH & EDUCATION FNDT: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATE OF MINNESOTA: $2,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS: $2,000 · OtherAGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $500 · OtherNew Hope Childrens Ministries: $20,000 · International
Education$590,774Arts & Culture$466,000Human Services$67,500Health$66,000Employment$39,000Other$50,500International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $485,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE: $385,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $105,774 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAKKEN: $41,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMAGNUM CHORUM: $40,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetThe Lift Garage: $39,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBRIGHTER DAYS FAMILY GRIEF CENTER: $37,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetTeam Heart Inc: $35,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCRESCENT COVE: $30,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSKY HIGH HOPE CAMP: $26,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetNew Hope Childrens Ministries: $20,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHANKSGIVING MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $11,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetAGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Breath of Hope Lung Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BAKKEN ↗
  • Who funds MAGNUM CHORUM ↗
  • Who funds The Lift Garage ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTER DAYS FAMILY GRIEF CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Team Heart Inc ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENT COVE ↗
  • Who funds SKY HIGH HOPE CAMP ↗
  • Who funds New Hope Childrens Ministries ↗
  • Who funds THANKSGIVING MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds AGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds A Breath of Hope Lung Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Xcel Energy FoundationMN16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lillehei Family Charitable Foundation Agency funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lillehei Family Charitable Foundation Agency. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lillehei Family Charitable Foundation Agency?

    Find your warmest path to Lillehei Family Charitable Foundation Agency through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lillehei Family Charitable Foundation Agency’s filings →

    More from the funding graph