Skip to content
Leslie Warrington Bailey Fdtn at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Leslie Warrington Bailey Fdtn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$274k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Religion$162kArts & Culture$72kRecreation & Sports$34kAnimals$31kCrime & Legal$31kHealth$30kEducation$20kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $205k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOUNDATION$25,000
ORANGEWOOD CHURCH$24,500
GRACE MEDICAL HOME INC$20,000
VICTIM SERVICE CENTER OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$20,000
CHRISTIAN CAMPS INC$20,000
THE INDIAN HILL CHURCH$20,000
ORLANDO CHILDRENS CHURCH INC$20,000
EDGARTOWN YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC$15,000
CREALDE ARTS INC$10,000
AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ALL SAINTS CHURCH FOUNDATION OF WINTER$10,000
ANIMAL SHELTER OF MARTHA S VINEYARD$8,000
CENTRAL NEW YORK CAT COALITION INC$5,000
CENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY HELPING PLACE INC: $2k → 12%LAKER TRANSPORTATION PROJECT INC: $4k → 14%LAKER TRANSPORTATION PROJECT INC: $3k → 14%CENTRAL FLORIDA DOWN SYNDROME ASSN: $3k → 13%CENTRAL FLORIDA DOWN SYNDROME ASSN: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$340k · 19 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
6

Total granted

$340k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+9%

Still filing today

68%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CREALDE ARTS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +12%
  • CC
    Christian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & Subsidiary
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +5%
  • EY
    Edgartown Yacht Club Foundation Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +833% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • SC
    SEMINOLE COUNTY VICTIMS' RIGHTS COALITION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue +9%
  • IH
    INDIAN HILL EPISCOPAL PRESBYTERIAN
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • BA
    BELOVED ASHEVILLE
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
2
Fluvanna County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To rescue domestic animals from cruelty, neglect, and abandonment and place

Animals
3
Humane Society of Lake County Inc

The Humane Society of Lake County is a non-profit corporation organized solely for charitable purposes and has the general responsibility to operate for the advancement of humane treatment and the prevention of cruelty to animals. Founded…

Animals
4
Central Vermont Humane Society Inc

To educate the public in the prevention of cruelty to animals and provide shelter and medical care for homeless animals as well as assist in finding permanent homes for these animals.

Animals
5
St Lawrence Valley Spca Inc

The mission of the st. lawrence valley spca is to provide quality care for unwanted animals, alleviate pain and suffering, promote quality adoptions, advocate spay/neuter as the only humane method of pet population control, and to educate…

Animals
6
Humane Society of South Brevard Inc

Animal Shelter, Adoptions and Related Services

Animals
7
Leesburg Humane Society

The leesburg humane society is a no kill non-profit orgainzation dedicated to rescuing and caring for abandoned pets and placing them in loving homes

Animals
8
Save-a Pet of Niagara County Inc

We strive to reduce pet overpopulation and improve the welfare of cats and dogs in our community. we believe all animals should be treated with respect and deserve to live in a safe, loving home.

Unclassified
9
A Kitten Place Inc

A kitten place is a volunteer based animal rescue in the tampa bay area providing foster care, which includes quality veterinary care, socialization and adoption placement to homeless and needy kitten and cats in the community. we are…

Animals
10
Animal Shelter of Northeast Nebraska Inc

Provide humane care of abandoned, neglected or abused pets for adoption purposes and to educate the public about the proper care of animals.

—
11
Raskels Rescue
Animals
12
Central New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Animal protection by providing shelter, care and medical attention for stray, abused and unwanted animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Victim Service Center of Central Florida Inc; the most unlike its peers is Laker Transportation Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE INDIAN HILL CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherTHE INDIAN HILL CHURCHALL SAINTS CHURCH FOUNDATION OF WINTER: $33,500 · OtherALL SAINTS CHURCH FOUNDATION OF WINTERORANGEWOOD CHURCH: $32,500 · OtherORANGEWOOD CHURCHST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOUNDATIONCREALDE ARTS INC: $30,000 · OtherCREALDE ARTS INCChristian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & Subsidiary: $30,000 · OtherChristian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & SubsidiaryORLANDO CHILDRENS CHURCH INC: $20,000 · OtherORLANDO CHILDRENS CHURCH INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+12 more: $59,000 · Other+12 moreAnimal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard Inc: $11,000 · AnimalsCentral New York Cat Coalition Inc: $9,500 · AnimalsFINGER LAKES SPCA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK: $5,000 · AnimalsDOBERMAN RESCUE LEAGUE INC: $4,500 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsEdgartown Yacht Club Foundation Inc: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSKANEATELES SKI CLUB INC: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsGrace Medical Home Inc: $25,000 · HealthTHE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationVictim Service Center of Central Florida Inc: $20,000 · Crime & LegalLAKER TRANSPORTATION PROJECT INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesCentral Florida Down Syndrome Assoc Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesSEMINOLE COUNTY VICTIMS' RIGHTS COALITION INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HELPING PLACE INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$287,000Animals$31,000Recreation & Sports$29,000Health$25,000Education$20,000Crime & Legal$20,000Human Services$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCREALDE ARTS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetChristian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & Subsidiary: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGrace Medical Home Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEdgartown Yacht Club Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetTHE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVictim Service Center of Central Florida Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAnimal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard Inc: $11,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCentral New York Cat Coalition Inc: $9,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetENOTAH CASA INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSKANEATELES VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTME: $7,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetLAKER TRANSPORTATION PROJECT INC: $6,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF MVYRADIO INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSKANEATELES HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCentral Florida Down Syndrome Assoc Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDOBERMAN RESCUE LEAGUE INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSKANEATELES SKI CLUB INC: $4,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSEMINOLE COUNTY VICTIMS' RIGHTS COALITION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELPING PLACE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Warrington Founda…Central Florida Found…Central New York Comm…Synchrony FoundationVerizon FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…Renaissance Charitabl…Natl Christian Charit…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…Network for Good
The Warrington Foundation Co Fifth ThirdOH28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Warrington Foundation Co Fifth Third · Central Florida Foundation · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Synchrony Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leslie Warrington Bailey Fdtn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leslie Warrington Bailey Fdtn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Friends of Mvyradio Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leslie Warrington Bailey Fdtn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home