Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Leslie Warrington Bailey Fdtn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$274k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Religion$162kArts & Culture$72kRecreation & Sports$34kAnimals$31kCrime & Legal$31kHealth$30kEducation$20kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $205k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOUNDATION$25,000
ORANGEWOOD CHURCH$24,500
GRACE MEDICAL HOME INC$20,000
VICTIM SERVICE CENTER OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$20,000
CHRISTIAN CAMPS INC$20,000
THE INDIAN HILL CHURCH$20,000
ORLANDO CHILDRENS CHURCH INC$20,000
EDGARTOWN YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION INC$15,000
CREALDE ARTS INC$10,000
AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ALL SAINTS CHURCH FOUNDATION OF WINTER$10,000
ANIMAL SHELTER OF MARTHA S VINEYARD$8,000
CENTRAL NEW YORK CAT COALITION INC$5,000
CENTRAL NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY HELPING PLACE INC: $2k → 12%LAKER TRANSPORTATION PROJECT INC: $4k → 14%LAKER TRANSPORTATION PROJECT INC: $3k → 14%CENTRAL FLORIDA DOWN SYNDROME ASSN: $3k → 13%CENTRAL FLORIDA DOWN SYNDROME ASSN: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$340k · 19 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
6

Total granted

$340k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+9%

Still filing today

68%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Christian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & Subsidiary
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +5%
  • EY
    Edgartown Yacht Club Foundation Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +833% · 27% of their budget
  • TA
    THE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • SC
    SEMINOLE COUNTY VICTIMS' RIGHTS COALITION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue +9%
  • IH
    INDIAN HILL EPISCOPAL PRESBYTERIAN
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HELPING PLACE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
2
Fluvanna County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To rescue domestic animals from cruelty, neglect, and abandonment and place

Animals
3
Humane Society of Lake County Inc

The Humane Society of Lake County is a non-profit corporation organized solely for charitable purposes and has the general responsibility to operate for the advancement of humane treatment and the prevention of cruelty to animals. Founded…

Animals
4
Central Vermont Humane Society Inc

To educate the public in the prevention of cruelty to animals and provide shelter and medical care for homeless animals as well as assist in finding permanent homes for these animals.

Animals
5
St Lawrence Valley Spca Inc

The mission of the st. lawrence valley spca is to provide quality care for unwanted animals, alleviate pain and suffering, promote quality adoptions, advocate spay/neuter as the only humane method of pet population control, and to educate…

Animals
6
Humane Society of South Brevard Inc

Animal Shelter, Adoptions and Related Services

Animals
7
Leesburg Humane Society

The leesburg humane society is a no kill non-profit orgainzation dedicated to rescuing and caring for abandoned pets and placing them in loving homes

Animals
8
Save-a Pet of Niagara County Inc

We strive to reduce pet overpopulation and improve the welfare of cats and dogs in our community. we believe all animals should be treated with respect and deserve to live in a safe, loving home.

Unclassified
9
A Kitten Place Inc

A kitten place is a volunteer based animal rescue in the tampa bay area providing foster care, which includes quality veterinary care, socialization and adoption placement to homeless and needy kitten and cats in the community. we are…

Animals
10
Animal Shelter of Northeast Nebraska Inc

Provide humane care of abandoned, neglected or abused pets for adoption purposes and to educate the public about the proper care of animals.

11
Raskels Rescue
Animals
12
Central New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Animal protection by providing shelter, care and medical attention for stray, abused and unwanted animals.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Victim Service Center of Central Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Laker Transportation Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Community Health CentersCommunity Arts OrganizationsYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsGovernment Accountability R…Food Pantries & AssistanceVolunteer Fire DepartmentsChristian Youth CampsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Senior Support ServicesIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%27%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,537

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
11/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE INDIAN HILL CHURCH — $40,000 · OtherTHE INDIAN HILL CHURCHALL SAINTS CHURCH FOUNDATION OF WINTER — $33,500 · OtherALL SAINTS CHURCH FOUNDATION OF WINTERORANGEWOOD CHURCH — $32,500 · OtherORANGEWOOD CHURCHST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOUNDATION — $32,000 · OtherST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOUNDATIONChristian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & Subsidiary — $30,000 · OtherChristian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & SubsidiaryCREALDE ARTS INC — $30,000 · OtherCREALDE ARTS INCORLANDO CHILDRENS CHURCH INC — $20,000 · OtherORLANDO CHILDRENS CHURCH INCIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · Other+12 more — $59,000 · Other+12 moreAnimal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard Inc — $11,000 · AnimalsCentral New York Cat Coalition Inc — $9,500 · AnimalsFINGER LAKES SPCA OF CENTRAL NEW YORK — $5,000 · AnimalsDOBERMAN RESCUE LEAGUE INC — $4,500 · Animals+1 more — $1,000 · AnimalsEdgartown Yacht Club Foundation Inc — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSKANEATELES SKI CLUB INC — $4,000 · Recreation & SportsGrace Medical Home Inc — $25,000 · HealthTHE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL — $20,000 · EducationVictim Service Center of Central Florida Inc — $20,000 · Crime & LegalLAKER TRANSPORTATION PROJECT INC — $6,500 · Human ServicesCentral Florida Down Syndrome Assoc Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesSEMINOLE COUNTY VICTIMS' RIGHTS COALITION INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HELPING PLACE INC — $2,000 · Human Services
Other$287,000Animals$31,000Recreation & Sports$29,000Health$25,000Education$20,000Crime & Legal$20,000Human Services$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChristian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & Subsidiary — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCREALDE ARTS INC — $30,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGrace Medical Home Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEdgartown Yacht Club Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetTHE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVictim Service Center of Central Florida Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAnimal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard Inc — $11,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCentral New York Cat Coalition Inc — $9,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetENOTAH CASA INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSKANEATELES VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTME — $7,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetLAKER TRANSPORTATION PROJECT INC — $6,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF MVYRADIO INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSKANEATELES HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCentral Florida Down Syndrome Assoc Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDOBERMAN RESCUE LEAGUE INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSKANEATELES SKI CLUB INC — $4,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSEMINOLE COUNTY VICTIMS' RIGHTS COALITION INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELPING PLACE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Warrington Foundation Co Fifth ThirdOH28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Warrington Foundation Co Fifth Third · Central Florida Foundation · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Synchrony Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Leslie Warrington Bailey Fdtn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Friends of Mvyradio Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph