· Private foundation
The Warrington Foundation Co Fifth Third
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k70 grants · $245k
- $10k–50k42 grants · $641k
- $250k+4 grants · $14M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAMUEL BAILEY FAMILY FDTN | $3,440,069 |
| KOA CHARITABLE TRUST | $3,440,069 |
| LESLIE WARRINGTON BAILEY FDTN | $3,440,069 |
| BAILEY LAMSON FAMILY FDTN | $3,440,069 |
| UNITED ARTS OF CENTRAL FL INC | $45,000 |
| THE INDIAN HILL CHURCH | $37,500 |
| TRINITY COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| WOOD RIVER COMMUNITY YMCA | $25,000 |
| AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| SUN VALLEY INSTITUTE FOR RESILIENCE INC | $25,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CAMPS INC | $25,000 |
| ALL SAINTS CHURCH FOUNDATION OF | $25,000 |
| OUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL | $20,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD INCORPORATED | $17,000 |
| OCEAN CLEANUP NORTH PACIFIC FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
84 repeat relationships — 67 still active in FY2022, 17 since wound down; 46 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
TRINITY COLLEGE3× · 2020–2022 · $75k · revenue +34%- TATHE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL3× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +65%
- GTGRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY3× · 2020–2022 · $54k · revenue +230%
Funded once
- BFBEA FOR KIDS FAMILY OFFICE SERVICESone grant, 2021 · $15k
- OMORLANDO MUSEUM OF ART INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +66%
- TSTHE SPUR FOUNDATIONWARM SPRINGSone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.
Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements
The mission of the new canaan land trust is to foster a connection between the new canaan community and its natural resources through the conservation and sustainable stewardship of our open space.
The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…
Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…
Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.
To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.
The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
Protecting, enhancing and conserving open spaces encompassing meadows, woodlands, wetlands, and waterways in the town of wilton ct.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Museum Association and the most unlike its peers is Samuel Bailey Family Fdtn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KOA CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds SAMUEL BAILEY FAMILY FDTN ↗
- Who funds LESLIE WARRINGTON BAILEY FDTN ↗
- Who funds BAILEY LAMSON FAMILY FDTN ↗
- Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds TAFT MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY INSTITUTE FOR RESILIENCE ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD ↗
- Who funds THE NEW SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC ↗
- Who funds LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds CREALDE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds SALISBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CHARITABLE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Camps Inc dba Deerfoot Lodge & Subsidiary ↗
- Who funds The Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc ↗
- Who funds The Contemporary Arts Center ↗
- Who funds Know Theatre of Cincinnati ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Koa Charitable Trust · Leslie Warrington Bailey Fdtn · Samuel Bailey Family Fdtn · Bailey Lamson Family Fdtn · Spur Community Foundation Inc · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · The Frances R Luther Charitable Trust · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Josephine S Russell Charitable · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Andrew Jergens Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Warrington Foundation Co Fifth Third funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Village for Families and Children — 50% of income from government
- Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc — 10% of income from government
- Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in — 9% of income from government
- New England Life Flight Inc — 5% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Historical Association — 1% of income from government
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
- Trinity College — 0% of income from government
- Ballet Vero Beach Inc — 0% of income from government
- Aurora Women and Girls Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Artists Association of Nantucket Inc — 0% of income from government
- Orlando Museum of Art Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.