Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lescure Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$125kFood & Nutrition$51kArts & Culture$28kHousing & Shelter$19kEnvironment$16kHuman Services$7kEducation$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$808k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAFAYETTE-ORINDA PRESBYTERIAN CHURC$24,600
KQED$4,000
CONTRA COSTA FOOD BANK$2,000
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL$2,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$2,000
SAN RAMON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATI$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
A CURE IN SIGHT$2,000
MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER$2,000
TURN-THE UNTILITY REFORM NETWORK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$258k · 12 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$258k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+26%

Still filing today

58%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $19k · revenue +917%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $17k · revenue +76%
  • LA
    LOAVES AND FISHES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $13k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • AH
    ANTIOCH HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -43%
  • CH
    CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • CS
    CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
2
Tuolumne River Preservation Trust dba Yosemite Rivers Alliance

At Yosemite Rivers Alliance, we unite conservation and community to protect and restore the three rivers that ?ow through the Yosemite Regionthe Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced.

—
3
Sequoia Riverlands Trust

We conserve the lands and waters of California's heartland.

Environment
4
California Farmland Trust

The mission of the California Farmland Trust is to help farmers protect the best farmland in the world.

Environment
5
Northern California Regional Land Trust

The purpose of the organization is to monitor, manage, and preserve conservation easements it stewards in northern california. the organization acquires conservation easements in land exhibiting important natural features to protect and…

Environment
6
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
7
CalWild

The California Wilderness Coalition protects the natural landscapes that make California unique, providing clean air and water, a home to wildlife, and a place for recreation and spiritual renewal.

—
8
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
9
Santa Clara River Conservancy

The Santa Clara River Conservancy represents the diverse interests of the Santa Clara River, from the flood plain to the highest tributaries, and seeks to secure, sustain, and manage significant lands and waters that provide habitat for…

Environment
10
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
11
Golden State Land Conservancy Inc

Promote conservation easements and resource management plans that conserve agriculture lands, forestlands, wildlife habitat, open space, and other natural resources, in perpetuity.

Environment
12
California Association of Resource Conservation Districts

To advane the conservation and orderly development of Land, Water, and other natural resources in California and to create statewide awareness of the urgency for conserving and developing California's natural resources

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monument Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is California Highway Patrol. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAFAYETTE ORINDA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $91,600 · OtherLAFAYETTE ORINDA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCHURCH OF CHRIST: $33,000 · OtherCHURCH OF CHRISTIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONTRA COSTA FOOD BANK: $19,003 · OtherCONTRA COSTA FOOD BANKMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $16,500 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INCLOAVES AND FISHES: $13,000 · OtherLOAVES AND FISHESANTIOCH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 · Other+11 more: $18,500 · Other+11 moreContra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc: $19,000 · Housing & ShelterKQED INC: $17,500 · Arts & CultureJohn Muir Land Trust prev Muir Heritage Land Trust: $12,000 · EnvironmentMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $7,000 · Human ServicesCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $3,000 · AnimalsCALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$224,603Housing & Shelter$19,000Arts & Culture$17,500Environment$12,000Human Services$7,000Animals$3,000Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetContra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc: $19,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKQED INC: $17,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $16,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES: $13,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetJohn Muir Land Trust prev Muir Heritage Land Trust: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANTIOCH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Cure in Sight: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAN RAMON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES ↗
  • Who funds John Muir Land Trust prev Muir Heritage Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds ANTIOCH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL ↗
  • Who funds A Cure in Sight ↗
  • Who funds SAN RAMON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Antioch Community Foundation Attn Keith ArchuletaCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Antioch Community Foundation Attn Keith Archuleta · East Bay Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lescure Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lescure Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lescure Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lescure Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lescure’s filings →

    More from the funding graph