Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lenfestey Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$217k
Granted FY2025still arriving
74
Grants FY2025still arriving
18
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Arts & Culture$418kEnvironment$180kCommunity Improvement$125kEducation$87kInternational$58kCivil Rights$51kPhilanthropy$49kReligion$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 74 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k71 grants · $187k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WOMAN'S CLUB OF MINNEAPOLIS$10,000
VALENCIA ELEMENTARY HOME AND SCHOOL CLUB$10,000
FLOW (FOR LOVE OF WATER)$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$9,000
MACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$8,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$6,000
MICHILIMACKINAC HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
MINNESOTA CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCACY$5,000
MINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK ARTS$5,000
MINNESOTA MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$5,000
KENWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA$5,000
350ORG$5,000
JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM$5,000
MINNESOTA MEDIA ARTS$5,000
STEGER WILDERNESS CENTER FOR INNOVATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $5k → 10%JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $3k → 10%JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $2k → 10%JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $2k → 10%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $2k → 17%RYTHER: $5k → 9%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $2k → 12%THE BRIDGE FOR YOUTH: $1k → 11%TIWAHE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%TIWAHE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%UKRAINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 11%UKRAINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 11%UKRAINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 11%UKRAINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 11%UKRAINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Lenfestey Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Lenfestey Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 84 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

84 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
62

Total granted

$1.3M
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+2%

Still filing today

83%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OB
    Open Book
    2× · 2022–2023 · $125k · revenue +204%
  • TW
    THE WOMAN'S CLUB OF MINNEAPOLIS
    6× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +12%
  • TA
    The Advocates For Human Rights
    4× · 2022–2025 · $45k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • NEW ENGLAND FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -46%
  • PE
    PAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +69%
  • GS
    Global Synergy Group Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
2
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
3
Minnesota Environmental Partnership

The minnesota environmental partnership is a coalition that strengthens member effectiveness and builds collective power to secure a healthy environment for all minnesotans.

Environment
4
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
5
Minneapolis Saint Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership

The mission of the greater msp partnership is to accelerate regional competitiveness and inclusive economic growth through job creation, capital investment and execution of strategic initiatives. the partnership works to strengthen our…

Community Improvement
6
Environmental Initiative

Catalyze collaboration across perspectives, power, and systems for social equity and environmental health.

Environment
7
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
8
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
9
Minnesota Fringe Festival

Minnesota fringe connects adventurous artists with adventurous audiences by creating open, supportive forums for free and diverse artistic expression.

Arts & Culture
10
Mixed Blood Theatre Company

Mixed Blood Theatre Company uses theater to disrupt injustice. We are a social justice organization catalyzing action and change through art. Our work is guided by deep community engagement and rooted in radical hospitality.

—
11
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
12
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springboard for the Arts and the most unlike its peers is Ernest C Oberholtzer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …School Parent OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterIndependent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacyFood Banks and PantriesCommunity Arts CentersHealth Access Advocacy and …Local Food System Organizat…Women & Girls Leadership De…Local History MuseumsPregnancy Support ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Immigrant Worker Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%2%<5yr12%2%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr16%35%35–55yr18%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%4%<5yr12%2%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr16%27%35–55yr18%21%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/149
the rest of the field
10%
3,828/38,840

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

143 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 143 of the 170 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
139/143
Grantees still filing
83/143
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SEE THE LIST OF CONTRIBUTIONS — $261,200 · OtherSEE THE LIST OF CONTRIBUTIONSWATCH — $35,700 · OtherWATCHPLYMOUTH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH — $33,000 · OtherPLYMOUTH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHUKRAINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $26,500 · Other+76 more — $241,125 · Other+76 moreOpen Book — $125,000 · Arts & CultureOpen BookTHE LOFT INC — $36,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LOFT INCHill & Lake Press Inc — $35,000 · Arts & CultureHill & Lake Press IncGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION — $23,500 · Arts & CultureGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATIO…MINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK ARTS — $19,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK…RAIN TAXI INC — $14,000 · Arts & Culture+25 more — $87,750 · Arts & Culture+25 moreFOR LOVE OF WATER — $43,000 · EnvironmentFOR LOVE OF…350ORG — $23,500 · Environment350ORGENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $21,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENT…FRESH ENERGY — $12,000 · EnvironmentFRESH ENERG…Black Mesa Trust inc — $9,000 · EnvironmentBlack Mesa …TREES FOR THE FUTURE INC — $5,500 · Environment+15 more — $37,500 · Environment+15 moreThe Advocates For Human Rights — $45,000 · InternationalThe Advoc…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $24,500 · InternationalMEDECINS …WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $17,000 · InternationalWORLD CEN…ALIGHT — $10,000 · InternationalALIGHTEDEN PEOPLEPLANET — $5,500 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $5,500 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR — $5,000 · International+7 more — $11,500 · International+7 moreValencia Elementary Home & School Club — $40,000 · EducationANDERSON CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES INC — $16,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $11,500 · EducationANDERSON CENTER INC — $10,000 · EducationPROJECT SUCCESS — $8,000 · EducationMIGIZI Communications Inc — $7,000 · EducationDARROW SCHOOL — $6,000 · EducationSUMMIT ACADEMY OIC — $6,000 · EducationCLIMATE GENERATION — $5,000 · Education+4 more — $6,500 · EducationTHE WOMAN'S CLUB OF MINNEAPOLIS — $103,300 · Community ImprovementEconomic Opportunity Institute — $8,500 · Community Improvement+2 more — $4,000 · Community ImprovementMACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $35,000 · PhilanthropyLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $18,625 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $4,500 · Philanthropy
Other$597,525Arts & Culture$340,250Environment$151,500International$124,000Education$116,000Community Improvement$115,800Philanthropy$68,125

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOpen Book — $125,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetTHE WOMAN'S CLUB OF MINNEAPOLIS — $103,300 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetThe Advocates For Human Rights — $45,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFOR LOVE OF WATER — $43,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetValencia Elementary Home & School Club — $40,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetTHE LOFT INC — $36,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetWATCH — $35,700 over 2y, 12% of budgetMACKINAC ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetHill & Lake Press Inc — $35,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetUKRAINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $26,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $24,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION — $23,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budget350ORG — $23,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF SEATTLE KING COUNTY — $19,500 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetMINNESOTA CENTER FOR BOOK ARTS — $19,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $18,625 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY — $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRAIN TAXI INC — $14,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetFRESH ENERGY — $12,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJanet Munt Family Room — $11,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMICHILIMACKINAC HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $11,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON CENTER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBlack Mesa Trust inc — $9,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS — $8,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEconomic Opportunity Institute — $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT SUCCESS — $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOFFEE HOUSE PRESS INC — $7,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMIGIZI Communications Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDARROW SCHOOL — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA MEDIA ARTS — $6,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetSUMMIT ACADEMY OIC — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATIONS CARING FOR CREATION — $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEDEN PEOPLEPLANET — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAYWOLF PRESS — $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTree Trust — $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INCORPORATED — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis Found…The McKnight Foundati…Saint Paul & Minnesot…Margaret a Cargill Fo…Target FoundationPohlad Family Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…Marbrook FoundationXcel Energy FoundationJerome Foundation IncOtto Bremer TrustThe Head Family Found…
The Minneapolis FoundationMN66.3× affinity50 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Target Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Marbrook Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Jerome Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · The Head Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lenfestey Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Janet Munt Family Room — 44% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
  • New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated — 8% of income from government
  • Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation — 4% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
36report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lenfestey Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lenfestey Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 170 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines