Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lee and Luis Lainer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1000k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$2.8MReligion$1.0MEducation$1.0MCrime & Legal$663kHuman Services$375kPhilanthropy$279kCivil Rights$240kHousing & Shelter$195kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $845k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BET TZEDEK$200,000
IKAR$170,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$115,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$100,000
NEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC$80,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$80,000
HASHOMER HATZAIR INC-CAMPSHOMRIA$50,000
ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$50,000
USA FOR UNHCR$35,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES$15,000
LA 1ST$15,000
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS$15,000
PLOUGHSHARES FUND$15,000
LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $65k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 22 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
6

Total granted

$4.6M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+120%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsEnvironmentHealthSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BET TZEDEK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $663k · revenue +123%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $510k · revenue +81%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $280k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • PA
    PRESSMAN ACADEMY
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M
  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +120%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
United Israel Appeal Inc

The principal function of uia is to administer and supervise the funds allocated for philanthropic purposes related to immigration and absorption of humanitarian migrants to israel and jewish identity programs in israel and the former…

International
5
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
6
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
7
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
8
Global Communities

Global communities brings together local ingenuity and global insights to save lives and secure strong futures.

International
9
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
10
Nijc Nfp

The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) is a leader in advancing immigrant rights through its unique strategy drawing on its legal services to promote legal reform through litigation, advocacy and strategic communications.

Crime & Legal
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hispanic Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESSMAN ACADEMY: $1,000,000 · OtherPRESSMAN ACADEMYIKAR: $840,000 · OtherIKARBET TZEDEK: $662,500 · OtherBET TZEDEKJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LA: $235,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF LALA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $195,000 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATIONACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $150,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH AM BUILDING FUND: $120,000 · Other+12 more: $253,500 · Other+12 moreNEW ISRAEL FUND: $837,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC: $760,000 · InternationalNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $510,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $280,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCUnited States Association for UNHCR: $210,000 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCRPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC: $135,000 · International+1 more: $45,000 · InternationalJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $180,000 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $54,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $90,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $50,000 · Civil RightsJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $125,000 · Human ServicesNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $90,000 · EnvironmentPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $45,000 · Health
Other$3,456,000International$2,777,000Philanthropy$239,000Civil Rights$140,000Human Services$125,000Environment$90,000Health$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $837,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC: $760,000 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetBET TZEDEK: $662,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $510,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $280,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $210,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $195,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $180,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC: $135,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $54,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Supporters of Yedid Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUnited for A Fair Economy Inc: $15,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds NEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds BET TZEDEK ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds PLOUGHSHARES FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds American Supporters of Yedid Inc ↗
  • Who funds United for A Fair Economy Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lee and Luis Lainer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lee and Luis Lainer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lee and Luis Lainer Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lee and Luis Lainer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lee and Luis Lainer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph