Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Laura and Jason Rock Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Housing & Shelter$148kCommunity Improvement$137kYouth Development$32kPhilanthropy$24kHuman Services$5kReligion$4kArts & Culture$3kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $518
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$72k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
East Liberty Development Inc$23,000
Serenity Living Transitional Home$20,000
Action Housing$15,000
Pittsburgh Action Against Rape$518
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%East End Cooperative Ministry: $500 → 11%Melanin Mommies: $2k → 11%CENTER FOR VICTIMS: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$282k · 6 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
18

Total granted

$282k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-50%
+12%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $518 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EL
    East Liberty Development Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $89k · revenue -73%
  • SL
    SERENITY LIVING TRANSITIONAL HOME
    5× · 2020–2024 · $78k · revenue -52% · 94% of their budget
  • AC
    ALLEGHENY COUNCIL TO IMPROVE OUR NEIGHBORHOODS-HOUSING INCORPORATED
    4× · 2020–2024 · $70k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • GG
    Gwens Girls Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +99%
  • TO
    The Opportunity Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • UC
    UJAMAA COLLECTIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +324%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Community Reinvestment G

PCRG is a coalition of community leaders working for economic justice, equitable investment practices and sufficient financial resources to revitalize communities throughout Allegheny County, PA

Community Improvement
2
Prevention Point Pittsburgh

To provide health empowerment services to injection drug users and prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
3
Catapult Greater Pittsburgh

Catapult engages in connecting families to emergency resources, peer to peer support, wealth building, trauma informed financial counseling & policy advocacy to ensure that communities can meaningfully achieve economic justice & lead…

Community Improvement
4
World Affairs Council of Pittsburgh

The world affairs council of pittsburgh's mission is to convene and connect people around global issues to build a competitive, thriving, and inclusive pittsburgh.

International
5
Pittsburgh United

Pittsburgh United, Inc. strives to advance social & economic justice in the

Community Improvement
6
Global Solutions Pittsburgh

The global switchboard stewards a diverse network of people and organizations to promote equitable global engagement in the pittsburgh region. we strive to build a region where all people value diversity, practice empathy, and work…

International
7
Sustainable Pittsburgh

Provide information to decision maker in the pittsburgh region to promote economic prosperity, social equity, and environmental quality for sustainable solutions for communities and businesses.

Environment
8
Pittsburgh Housing Development Corp

To initiate, plan, finance, develop and manage housing development in the City of Pittsburgh, and upon request, in other municipalities with particular, but not exclusive, emphasis on such development in low to moderate income census…

Housing & Shelter
9
Greater Pittsburgh Arts Council

By sharing resources and fostering meaningful relationships that strengthen the region's creative community, the greater pittsburgh arts council builds a more resourced, connected, and informed arts sector, empowering artists and arts…

Arts & Culture
10
Casa of Allegheny County

To recruit and train community members to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
11
Young Women's Christian Association Greater Pittsburgh

Ywca greater pittsburgh is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. we envision a community that advances education, opportunity, and equity regardless of gender, race, or…

Human Services
12
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Allies Inc and the most unlike its peers is Serenity Living Transitional Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SERENITY LIVING TRANSITIONAL HOME — $77,790 · Housing & ShelterSERENITY LIVING TRANSITIONAL HOMEALLEGHENY COUNCIL TO IMPROVE OUR NEIGHBORHOODS-HOUSING INCORPORATED — $70,000 · Housing & ShelterALLEGHENY COUNCIL TO IMPROVE OUR NEIGHBORHOODS-…East Liberty Development Inc — $88,700 · Community ImprovementEast Liberty Development IncNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC — $42,328 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC+3 more — $5,771 · Community ImprovementGwens Girls Inc — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentGwens Gir…The Opportunity Fund — $15,000 · OtherThe Oppor…Rodef Shalom — $2,343 · OtherRodef Sha…THE@ALLIGNMENT CHAPTER — $1,500 · OtherCloaked In Favor Outreach Ministrie — $1,500 · OtherFroGang — $1,500 · OtherGO GIRLS INCORPORATED — $1,500 · OtherEMBLAZE Ministries — $1,500 · OtherMELANIN MOMMIES INC — $1,500 · Other+6 more — $3,018 · Other+6 moreTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyPOISE FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Philanthropy1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureAssemble Inc — $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC — $2,520 · Education
Housing & Shelter$147,790Community Improvement$136,799Youth Development$30,000Other$29,361Philanthropy$6,500Arts & Culture$3,000Education$2,520

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEast Liberty Development Inc — $88,700 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetSERENITY LIVING TRANSITIONAL HOME — $77,790 over 5y, 94% of budgetALLEGHENY COUNCIL TO IMPROVE OUR NEIGHBORHOODS-HOUSING INCORPORATED — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC — $42,328 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUJAMAA COLLECTIVE — $4,402 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC — $2,520 over 1y, 0.2% of budget1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOISE FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOR GOOD PGH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAssemble Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPittsburgh Action Against Rape — $518 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREPAIR THE WORLD — $369 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA38.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Opportunity Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Hillman Family Foundations · Poise Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Fisa Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · McAuley Ministries · Program to Aid Citizen Enterprise Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Laura and Jason Rock Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Laura and Jason Rock Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Laura and Jason Rock Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph