Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Poise Foundation

Poise amplifies the power of black communities to fuel transformative change and uplift pathways to self-determination and shared success.

$5.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
111
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Arts & Culture$5.8MCommunity Improvement$4.3MCrime & Legal$3.5MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$1.8MYouth Development$1.6MHealth$1.4MPublic Benefit$1.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 111 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 111 grants below total $5,423,297 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,711,289 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $287,992 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k67 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k32 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$21,667
Median grant
4
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROGRAM TO AID CITIZEN ENTERPRIZE$1,208,400
ALLIANCE FOR POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY$384,725
THE GENESIS COLLECTIVE$142,180
BLACK TECH NATION$140,000
MAYA ORGANIZATION$130,000
POORLAW$110,916
BIBLE CENTER CHURCH - THE OASIS PROJECT$105,000
FILIPINO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH$90,000
YOUTHPLACES$80,000
ZA'KIYAH HOUSE HOUSING$80,000
NEW HAZLETT CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$75,000
CASA SAN JOSE$75,000
SQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER$75,000
THE BRADLEY CENTER$75,000
WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IT TAKES PHILLY: $25k → 7%CASA SAN JOSE: $75k → 11%REALITY SPEAKING INC: $20k → 7%CASA SAN JOSE: $50k → 11%CHILDREN'S FIRST: $25k → 22%THE FAMILY LIFE CENTER: $15k → 10%TRANSYOUNITING PGH: $25k → 11%REBLOOM: $25k → 11%THE EDUCATION CULTURE OPPORTUNITIES FOUNDATION: $20k → 22%THE BRASHEAR ASSOCIATION INC: $25k → 11%MOMMY'S IMAGINATION STATION INC: $17k → 11%YOUTH ENRICHMENT SERVICES INC: $75k → 11%THAW INC: $21k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $20k → 11%YOUTH ENRICHMENT SERVICES INC: $20k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $15k → 11%YOUTH ENRICHMENT SERVICES INC: $15k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $45k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $30k → 11%TRANSYOUNITING PGH: $60k → 11%FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $25k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $130k → 11%SISTERS PGH: $70k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $51k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $75k → 11%THE BRADLEY CENTER: $75k → 11%PITTSBURGH MINORITY BUSINESS ACCELERATOR (DBA BEAM COLLABORATIVE): $20k → 11%POORLAW: $111k → 11%POORLAW: $109k → 11%CENTER OF LIFE: $25k → 11%CENTER OF LIFE: $22k → 11%POORLAW: $15k → 11%BETHANY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $25k → 11%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK: $15k → 11%BETHANY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $15k → 11%AMACHI PITTSBURGH: $75k → 11%MELANIN MOMMIES PGH INC: $25k → 11%REIMAGINE REENTRY INC: $25k → 11%AMACHI PITTSBURGH INC: $20k → 11%UNITED SOMALI BANTU GREATER PITTS: $20k → 11%CIVICALLY INC: $50k → 11%RUTH'S WAY INC: $20k → 11%RUTH'S WAY INC: $20k → 11%WOMEN EMPOWERED FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL: $25k → 11%NORTH SIDE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT: $15k → 11%UNITED SOMALI BANTU OF GREATER PITTSBURGH INC: $15k → 11%WOMEN EMPOWERED FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL EXCELLENCE: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
PA
CO
VA
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 108 repeat orgs$8.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

108 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 55 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

108
157

Total granted

$16M
$6.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+4%

Still filing today

70%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PT
    PROGRAM TO AID CITIZEN ENTERPRISE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +167% · 73% of their budget
  • HD
    HILL DANCE ACADEMY THEATRE
    2× · 2020–2022 · $521k · revenue +106%
  • 1M
    1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $311k · revenue +222%

Funded once

  • AA
    AFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue +12%
  • CT
    COMMUNITY THEATER PROJECT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $755k · revenue -23% · 34% of their budget
  • AA
    AFRO AMERICAN MUSIC INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -74% · 47% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Pittsburgh Project

The Pittsburgh Project is an urban neighborhood based, Christian community development organization that operates a series of youth development after school and summer programs and provides homeowner services for the elderly, disabled and…

Community Improvement
2
True T Pittsburgh
Human Services
3
Philadelphia Health Services Inc

Mentoring and educational programs for female youth

Youth Development
4
Prevention Point Pittsburgh

To provide health empowerment services to injection drug users and prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
5
Pittsburgh Metropolitan Area Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

The pittsburgh metropolitan area hispanic chamber of commerce is the principal regional advocate for the hispanic business community's civic and economic interests. it is our mission to develop, promote, and advocate on behalf of hispanic…

Community Improvement
6
Regional Workforce Collaborative - Swpa

To provide policy guidance, technical assistance, and program oversight for the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county, and to assist in the economic development of southwestern pa region.

Community Improvement
7
Belmont Alliance Civic Association

Community development resources

Youth Development
8
Healthy Village Learning Institute

We provide valuable culturally aligned learning processes designed to educate, insprire, and engage people to become change agents within their community(ies). we use technology, art, history, science, and research modules to address…

Youth Development
9
Artsmiths of Pittsburgh Art and Cultural Center Inc

Our mission is address inequity by engaging our community in the making and appreciation of art.

—
10
Heights Philadelphia

Heights is a new kind of organization, an economic mobility catalyst. we believe that creating pathways to educational and workforce success for low-income, black and brown, and first-generation-to-college students is the keystone of a…

Education
11
Catapult Greater Pittsburgh

Catapult engages in connecting families to emergency resources, peer to peer support, wealth building, trauma informed financial counseling & policy advocacy to ensure that communities can meaningfully achieve economic justice & lead…

Community Improvement
12
Pittsburgh Economic and Industrial Development Corporation

The Organization's purpose is to formulate, implement and promote commercial, industrial and other economic development goals, strategies and projects in the City of Pittsburgh. This includes purchase and master-leasing of real estate, as…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hosanna House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Anna Middleton Waite Learning Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyArts & Cultural Organizatio…Youth Development & Communi…Family Philanthropic Founda…Pittsburgh Community Develo…Public LibrariesMember Recreation ClubsYouth Competitive Sports Pr…Disability Services & Suppo…Community Economic Developm…Supportive Services for Vul…Private Charitable TrustsRegional Economic Developme…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%11%<5yr12%20%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr20%23%20–35yr17%9%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%11%<5yr12%16%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr20%20%20–35yr17%22%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
14/314
the rest of the field
8%
753/9,592

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

199 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 199 of the 321 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

25
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
55
Early backer (in before they grew)
188/199
Grantees still filing
107/199
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALLIANCE FOR POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY — $2,211,725 · OtherALLIANCE FOR POLICE ACCOUNTABILITYAFRO AMERICAN MUSIC INSTITUTE INC — $500,250 · OtherAFRO AMERICAN MUSIC INSTITUTE INCHILL HOUSE ASSOCIATION — $389,650 · OtherPOISE FOUNDATION — $450,527 · Other+100 more — $5,669,676 · Other+100 moreAFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER — $1,076,601 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN AMERICAN CULTUR…COMMUNITY THEATER PROJECT CORPORATION — $755,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY THEATER PROJE…HILL DANCE ACADEMY THEATRE — $520,500 · Arts & CultureHILL DANCE ACADEMY THEA…1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY INC — $310,609 · Arts & Culture1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY INCTHE LEGACY ARTS PROJECT INC — $260,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LEGACY ARTS PROJECT…Pittsburgh Playwrights Theatre Company — $250,000 · Arts & CultureNEW HORIZON THEATER INC — $250,000 · Arts & CultureKENTE ARTS ALLIANCE — $250,000 · Arts & CultureThe Genesis Collective Inc — $231,780 · Arts & CultureBalafon West African Dance Ensemble — $171,667 · Arts & CulturePEARLARTS MOVEMENT & SOUND — $171,667 · Arts & Culture+10 more — $597,304 · Arts & Culture+10 morePROGRAM TO AID CITIZEN ENTERPRISE INC — $3,255,420 · HealthPROGRAM TO AID C…+5 more — $218,500 · Health+5 morePOORLAW — $247,700 · Human ServicesPOORLAWMAYA ORGANIZATION — $130,000 · Human ServicesMAYA ORGA…CASA SAN JOSE — $125,000 · Human ServicesCASA SAN …YOUTH ENRICHMENT SERVICES INC — $121,608 · Human ServicesYOUTH ENR…AMACHI PITTSBURGH INC — $108,743 · Human ServicesAMACHI PI…TRANSYOUNITING — $85,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $75,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRADLEY CENTER INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesNEW SUN RISING — $71,000 · Human ServicesSISTERS PGH CORP — $70,000 · Human Services+25 more — $750,918 · Human Services+25 moreThe Advanced Leadership Institute Inc — $1,165,601 · Public BenefitMANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION — $500,000 · Public BenefitLETS GET FREE- THE WOMEN & TRANS — $100,000 · Public Benefit+1 more — $15,000 · Public BenefitTHE HEAR FOUNDATION — $1,106,379 · Crime & Legal+7 more — $167,909 · Crime & LegalTRINITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $250,173 · EducationTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $107,450 · EducationTHE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC — $90,000 · EducationREDEEMER LUTHERAN SCHOOL — $89,514 · EducationFAME — $75,000 · EducationACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE — $70,000 · EducationPROTOTYPE PGH INC — $60,000 · EducationCornell University — $60,000 · EducationPITTSBURGH SCHOLAR HOUSE INC — $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $47,824 · Education+11 more — $230,820 · Education
Other$9,221,828Arts & Culture$4,845,128Health$3,473,920Human Services$1,934,969Public Benefit$1,780,601Crime & Legal$1,274,288Education$1,130,781

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROGRAM TO AID CITIZEN ENTERPRISE INC — $3,255,420 over 3y, 73% of budgetThe Advanced Leadership Institute Inc — $1,165,601 over 2y, 23% of budgetTHE HEAR FOUNDATION — $1,106,379 over 3y, 92% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER — $1,076,601 over 1y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY THEATER PROJECT CORPORATION — $755,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetHILL DANCE ACADEMY THEATRE — $520,500 over 2y, 17% of budgetAFRO AMERICAN MUSIC INSTITUTE INC — $500,250 over 1y, 47% of budgetMANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION — $500,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetPOISE FOUNDATION — $450,527 over 4y, 3.3% of budget1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY INC — $310,609 over 3y, 11% of budgetTHE LEGACY ARTS PROJECT INC — $260,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $250,173 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetPittsburgh Playwrights Theatre Company — $250,000 over 1y, 55% of budgetNEW HORIZON THEATER INC — $250,000 over 1y, 65% of budgetKENTE ARTS ALLIANCE — $250,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetPOORLAW — $247,700 over 4y, 49% of budgetThe Genesis Collective Inc — $231,780 over 2y, 68% of budgetBLOOMFIELD-GARFIELD CORPORATION — $221,667 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetPITTSBURGH HARDBALL ACADEMY INC — $216,497 over 4y, 64% of budgetUJAMAA COLLECTIVE — $201,667 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetBROTHERS AND SISTERS EMERGING — $180,900 over 2y, 19% of budgetBalafon West African Dance Ensemble — $171,667 over 2y, 70% of budgetPEARLARTS MOVEMENT & SOUND — $171,667 over 2y, 26% of budgetWOMEN OF VISIONS INC — $171,667 over 2y, 64% of budgetACH Clear Pathways — $159,555 over 3y, 11% of budgetYOUTHPLACES — $140,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetMAYA ORGANIZATION — $130,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetTRADE INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH — $130,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetCASA SAN JOSE — $125,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetYOUTH ENRICHMENT SERVICES INC — $121,608 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetFILIPINO AMERICAN ASSOC OF PGH — $112,400 over 2y, 63% of budgetAMACHI PITTSBURGH INC — $108,743 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $107,450 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHOMEWOOD CHIDREN'S VILLAGE — $106,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetLETS GET FREE- THE WOMEN & TRANS — $100,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetTHE EQUITY IMPACT CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetZa kiyah House Housing — $95,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC — $90,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetREDEEMER LUTHERAN SCHOOL — $89,514 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT ASSOCIATION INC — $85,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFranklin Center of Beaver County — $81,960 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetGwens Girls Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH — $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCarnegie Library of Homestead — $75,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUNION PROJECT — $75,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER — $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGLOBAL LINKS — $75,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…The Heinz EndowmentsOpportunity FoundationHillman Family Founda…The Grable FoundationEden Hall FoundationRichard King Mellon F…Program to Aid Citize…Staunton Farm Foundat…McElhattan FoundationUpmc GroupThe Buhl Foundation
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA144.3× affinity165 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Opportunity Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Grable Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Program to Aid Citizen Enterprise Inc · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · McElhattan Foundation · Upmc Group · The Buhl Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Poise Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    62report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 321 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines