· Community foundation
Latino Community Fund Inc
The Organization supports Latino-serving and Latino-led nonprofit organization and the Latinx community as a whole in Georgia.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $325,400 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $457,617 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $132,217 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k12 grants · $268k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Nexus | $57,300 |
| The LAA | $33,750 |
| Refugee Women's Network | $32,500 |
| We Love BuHi | $32,000 |
| CLILA | $25,000 |
| U-Lead Athens | $25,000 |
| Migrant Equity Southeast Inc | $25,000 |
| Prospera Georgia LLC | $22,500 |
| Arte Georgia | $19,350 |
| GALEO | $15,000 |
| The Praxis Project Inc | $15,000 |
| Hispanic Organization Promoting Education | $13,000 |
| Unidos Latino Association | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $855k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CDCOALICION DE LIDERES LATINOS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $533k · revenue +20% · 98% of their budget
- MEMigrant Equity Southeast Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $247k · revenue +911% · 41% of their budget
- UAU-Lead Athens Inc8× · 2018–2025 · $226k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- AAASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICEone grant, 2019 · $51k
- AAASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $38k · revenue +30%
- CLCAMINAR LATINO INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +180%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Organization supports Latino-serving and Latino-led nonprofit organization and the Latinx community as a whole in Georgia. This support includes advocacy work, program development, technical assistance, grant making, and more. Our…
The Coalition is dedicated to educating Latino immigrant newcomers, celebrating hispanic culture, and advocating for underserved segments of the population. Programs and initiatives include economic development, legal counsel, community…
To protect and empower immigrant survivors of crime and persecution.
The georgia latino alliance for human rights (glahr) educate and organizes the latino community in georgia to defend and promote their civil and humna rights. established en 2001 glahr is a community organization that develops grassroots…
A non-profit, nonpartisan tax-exempt organization that is a community developement advocacy organization that champions economic equality, civic engagement, and social justice for latino and immigrant families
Galeo impact fund strives for a better georgia where the latino community is respected and recognized, elected officials are held accountable, and georgians are engaged civically.
The mission of Alianza Americas is to bring about a more inclusive, equitable and sustainable way of life for Latino immigrant communities living in the United States and across the americas. By working transnationally with partners from…
New american pathways is an atlanta based nonprofit with the mission of helping refugees and georgia thrive.
Hispanic alliance georgia is one of the largest direct services agencies in the state, providing wrap around services specific to the latino families in need in hall county and surrounding areas in 15 counties. monthly we help 3000…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Refugees Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women Watch Afrika. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 31% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 21% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COALICION DE LIDERES LATINOS INC ↗
- Who funds Migrant Equity Southeast Inc ↗
- Who funds LOS VECINOS DE BUFORD HIGHWAY ↗
- Who funds U-Lead Athens Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIDOS LATINO ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds GALEO LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA ↗
- Who funds Economic Justice Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds SER FAMILIA ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE WOMENS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC ORG PROMOTING EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Casa De Amistad Inc ↗
- Who funds EL REFUGIO MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Feminist Womens Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Latin American Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds NEXUS INC ↗
- Who funds Georgia Muslim Voter Project ↗
- Who funds WE LOVE BUFORD HIGHWAY INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds AMANI WOMEN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAMINAR LATINO INC ↗
- Who funds Sandy Springs Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds PROSPERA GEORGIA LLC ↗
- Who funds THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Asian Americans Advancing Justice Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · The Goizueta Foundation Inc · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation Inc · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Georgia Alliance Education Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Latino Community Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.