· Public charity
Asian Americans Advancing Justice Atlanta Inc
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services, organizing & civic engagement, and impact litigation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $250,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $447,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $197,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REFUGEE WOMENS NETWORK INC | $30,000 |
| U-LEAD ATHENS INC | $22,000 |
| BOAT PEOPLE SOS ATLANTA | $20,000 |
| LAOTIAN AMERICAN SOCIETY | $18,000 |
| TIDES FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| COALICION DE LIDERES LATINOS | $10,000 |
| DIGNIDAD IMMIGRANTE EN ATHENS | $10,000 |
| WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA | $10,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN ADVOCACY FUND | $10,000 |
| ATHENS IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COAL | $10,000 |
| CASA | $10,000 |
| GA FAMILIAS UNIDAS | $10,000 |
| CAIR GEORGIA | $10,000 |
| GALEO | $10,000 |
| LATINO COMMUNITY FUND INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $568k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RIRAKSHA INC2× · 2021–2022 · $278k · revenue +20%
- WWWOMEN WATCH AFRIKA5× · 2020–2024 · $141k · revenue +13%
- GMGeorgia Muslim Voter Project5× · 2020–2024 · $107k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- UDUS DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITone grant, 2021 · $243k
- SASOUTHEAST ASIAN COALITIONone grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +22% · 37% of their budget
- BSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 96 CENTRAL GA COUNCILgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $134k · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…
United Women of the Horn (UWH) exists to advance the leadership, safety, and civic participation of Black immigrant women, with a focus on East African communities. The organization delivers trauma-informed, culturally grounded programs…
Asians for Collective Action (ACA) harnesses the strenghts of Asians and Asian Americans to drive systemic change to create a just, healthy, and thriving community for all.
Galeo impact fund strives for a better georgia where the latino community is respected and recognized, elected officials are held accountable, and georgians are engaged civically.
Asian American Voices for Education is a Georgia based nonprofit Organization. AAVED mission is to promote American history and identity
Civic Engagement for the Haitian Community
Transforming Georgia, Inc. is organized to make an indelible impact on the lives of Georgians through fighting for voting rights, supporting legislative solutions, programs and other proactive efforts to transform our communities.
Coordinate pro bono legal aid for victims of anti-Asian violence.
Various national educational programs and services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Korean American Service and Education Consortium Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women Watch Afrika. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RAKSHA INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST ASIAN COALITION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 96 CENTRAL GA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Georgia Muslim Voter Project ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE WOMENS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds Latino Community Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds GALEO LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK ALLIANCE FOR JUST IMMIGRATION ↗
- Who funds COMMON CAUSE ↗
- Who funds Casa De Amistad Inc ↗
- Who funds ERITREAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF GA INC ↗
- Who funds U-Lead Athens Inc ↗
- Who funds ASIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ATHENAS WAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Every Voice Texas dba Asian Texans for Justice ↗
- Who funds ABOLITIONIST TEACHING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds COALICION DE LIDERES LATINOS INC ↗
- Who funds Migrant Equity Southeast Inc ↗
- Who funds Athens For Everyone Inc ↗
- Who funds ACT2CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN ADVOCACY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMANI WOMEN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds Economic Justice Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Latino Community Fund Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation Incorporated · Southern Partners Fund Inc · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Progeorgia State Table Inc · Georgia Alliance Education Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Asian Americans Advancing Justice Atlanta Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Asian Community Development Corporation — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.