· Public charity
Georgia Alliance Education Fund Inc
The organization works to inform and educate through the development of fact-based reseach, analysis, and solutions for policy makers thorugh leaders, and the media in georgia including review of civic engagement organizations and the performance of community outreach activities
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k22 grants · $475k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $996k
- $250k+2 grants · $665k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DIALOGUE COLLABORATIVE | $415,000 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC | $250,000 |
| PROJECT 68 EDUCATION FUND INC | $215,000 |
| PRO GEORGIA STATE TABLE INC | $200,000 |
| NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC | $200,000 |
| COLLECTIVE RENAISSANCE GEORGIA | $180,000 |
| GEORGIA STAND-UP | $50,300 |
| CASA INC | $50,300 |
| GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS | $50,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - ATLANTA | $50,000 |
| BLACK MALE VOTER PROJECT EDUCATION FUND | $49,500 |
| REPGA INSTITUTE INC | $40,000 |
| BLACK MALE INITIATIVE GEORGIA INC | $25,300 |
| CENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES | $25,000 |
| IMAGINE JUSTICE SOCIETY | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +116%
- CRCOLLECTIVE RENAISSANCE GUILD3× · 2022–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +149% · 88% of their budget
- GSGeorgia Strategic Alliance for New2× · 2023–2024 · $520k · revenue +128% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
- GCGeorgia Coalition for the People's Agendagraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1.3M · revenue +99% · 60% of their budget
- CICAIR-NGA INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +35%
- EGENVIRONMENT GEORGIA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTERone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Transforming Georgia, Inc. is organized to make an indelible impact on the lives of Georgians through fighting for voting rights, supporting legislative solutions, programs and other proactive efforts to transform our communities.
To support progressive civic engagement
To educate Georgia voters, increase voter participation, and advocate for common sense policy solutions.
Providing education of the public on local and national issues, in order to combat misinformation, through targeted digital marketing, based on data, and community engagement.
The mission of the collective renaissance guild is to educate, inform and train young leaders to build community and serve black communities and communities across the globe. we do this by elevating blac
Competitive Georgia is dedicated to fostering a balanced, fair, and predictable legal environment in Georgia through tort reform that curbs frivolous lawsuits, stabilizes insurance costs, and promotes economic growth while preserving…
The aclu of georgia is dedicated to preserving the civil liberties enshrined in the u.s. constitution and bill of rights. through litigation, lobbying, and communications, the aclu of georgia works to preserve and enhance the rights of all…
Galeo impact fund strives for a better georgia where the latino community is respected and recognized, elected officials are held accountable, and georgians are engaged civically.
To promote the rights of workers and have representation before management.
Fair fight action promotes fair elections in georgia and around the country, encourages voter participation in elections, educates voters about elections and their voting rights, and advocates for progressive issues.
Georgia Value Action works to advance democracy and economic policy for Georgias working families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Strategic Alliance for New and the most unlike its peers is Sowega Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds COLLECTIVE RENAISSANCE GUILD ↗
- Who funds Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda ↗
- Who funds BLACK MALE VOTER PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Georgia Strategic Alliance for New ↗
- Who funds Georgia Muslim Voter Project ↗
- Who funds ACLU FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds RISE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds PROJECT 68 EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Georgia Investor Action Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds RepGA Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GA INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA BUDGET AND POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK MALE INITIATIVE GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GALEO LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CAIR-NGA INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENT GEORGIA RESEARCH AND POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Fair Elections Center ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CASA INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM ↗
- Who funds STEP UP SAVANNAH INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN PUBLIC LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds Feminist Womens Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMEN ENGAGED INC ↗
- Who funds THE IMAGINE JUSTICE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Public Education Matters Georgia Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds Sowega Rising ↗
- Who funds JOSEPH AND EVELYN LOWERY INSTITUTE JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · Windward Fund · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Progeorgia State Table Inc · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Justfundus · All Voting Is Local
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Georgia Alliance Education Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Georgia Alliance Education Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Georgia Alliance Education Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.