Skip to content

· Private foundation

Larsen Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$900k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$2.1MEducation$666kRecreation & Sports$220kCommunity Improvement$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kHuman Services$14kHealth$2kInternational$950Other$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $97k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
  • $250k+1 grant · $900k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$900,000
MESSIAH UNIVERSITY$125,000
SANIBEL COMMUNITY CHURCH$20,000
DEERFRONT LODGE CHRISTIAN CAMP$20,000
NAVIGATORS$15,000
GOSPEL VOLUNTEERS$12,000
HARVEY CEDARS BIBLE CONFERENCE$10,000
HOUGHTON COLLEGE$10,000
NEW HORIZON OF SWFL$10,000
GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
THE VILLAGE CHURCH$2,000
SPECULATOR VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE$1,500
CHRISTIAN HERITAGE SCHOOL$1,000
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$1,000
SHELL POINT HEALTH CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $250k → 8%GOSPEL VOLUNTEERS: $825k → 11%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $10k → 19%THE FORGE FOR FAMILIES: $10k → 16%CHO YEH CAMP: $900k → 19%THE VILLAGE CHURCH: $10k → 11%HARVEY CEDARS BIBLE CONFERENCE: $10k → 11%GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 16%MESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $200k → 8%GOSPEL VOLUNTEERS: $500k → 11%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $10k → 19%CHO YEH CAMP: $850k → 19%THE VILLAGE CHURCH: $2k → 11%HARVEY CEDARS BIBLE CONFERENCE: $10k → 11%MESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $125k → 8%GOSPEL VOLUNTEERS: $450k → 11%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $5k → 19%CHO YEH CAMP: $720k → 19%LEGACY FOUNDATION AT SHELL POINT: $1k → 11%MESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $50k → 8%GOSPEL VOLUNTEERS: $100k → 11%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $5k → 19%CHO YEH CAMP: $680k → 19%THE VILLAGE CHURCH: $1k → 11%REACH BEYOND: $10k → 9%DEERFRONT LODGE CHRISTIAN CAMP: $75k → 11%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $5k → 19%CHO YEH CAMP: $610k → 19%LEGACY FOUNDATION AT SHELL POINT: $1k → 11%REACH BEYOND: $10k → 9%GOSPEL VOLUNTEERS: $72k → 11%HOUGHTON COLLEGE: $5k → 19%CHO YEH CAMP: $265k → 19%LEGACY FOUNDATION AT SHELL POINT: $1k → 11%DEERFRONT LODGE CHRISTIAN CAMP: $50k → 11%POLK COUNTY MISSION CENTER: $10k → 19%DEERFRONT LODGE CHRISTIAN CAMP: $50k → 11%DEERFRONT LODGE CHRISTIAN CAMP: $25k → 11%DEERFRONT LODGE CHRISTIAN CAMP: $20k → 11%GOSPEL VOLUNTEERS: $12k → 11%SPECULATOR VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE: $11k → 11%SPECULATOR VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE: $2k → 11%SPECULATOR VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE: $2k → 11%SANIBEL COMMUNITY CHURCH: $20k → 11%SANIBEL COMMUNITY CHURCH: $20k → 11%SANIBEL COMMUNITY CHURCH: $20k → 11%NEW HORIZON OF SWFL: $12k → 11%NEW HORIZON OF SWFL: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CO
MO
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.7M · 14 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$7.7M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
0%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalReligionRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GV
    GOSPEL VOLUNTEERS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +131%
  • MU
    MESSIAH UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $625k · revenue +9%
  • HU
    HOUGHTON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FORGE FOR FAMILIES
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +0%
  • PC
    POLK COUNTY MISSION CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IF
    INTERNATIONAL FIBRODYYSPLASIA OFFIFICANS PROGRESSIVA ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
3
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
4
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
5
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
6
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
7
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
8
Hope International University

The mission of hope international university is to empower students through christian higher education to serve the church and impact the world for christ. the university specializes in fields offering significant influence on society…

Education
9
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
10
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
11
Northeastern Seminary

Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…

Education
12
Mid-Atlantic Christian University

Mid-atlantic christian university is an undergraduate institution of christian higher learning whose mission is to impact the world by transforming ordinary people into extraordinary christian leaders. students are taught to think…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA; the most unlike its peers is Speculator Volunteer Ambulance Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $4,025,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE NAVIGATORS: $655,000 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSDEERFRONT LODGE CHRISTIAN CAMP: $220,000 · Other+14 more: $158,000 · OtherGOSPEL VOLUNTEERS INC: $1,959,311 · Recreation & SportsGOSPEL VOLUNTEERS INCMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $625,000 · EducationMESSIAH U…HOUGHTON UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · EducationHOUGHTON …+1 more: $1,000 · EducationSPECULATOR VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP: $14,500 · HealthTHE FORGE FOR FAMILIES: $10,000 · Crime & LegalThe Legacy Foundation At Shell Point Inc: $3,900 · PhilanthropyInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $1,000 · Religion+1 more: $10 · ReligionCompassion International Incorporated: $640 · InternationalECHO Inc: $300 · International
Other$5,058,000Recreation & Sports$1,959,311Education$666,000Health$14,500Crime & Legal$10,000Philanthropy$3,900Religion$1,010International$940

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOSPEL VOLUNTEERS INC: $1,959,311 over 6y, 19% of budgetMESSIAH UNIVERSITY: $625,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEY CEDARS BIBLE CONFERENCE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPECULATOR VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP: $14,500 over 4y, 10% of budgetTHE FORGE FOR FAMILIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Legacy Foundation At Shell Point Inc: $3,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN HERITAGE SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetECHO Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOSPEL VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MESSIAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOUGHTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HARVEY CEDARS BIBLE CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds SPECULATOR VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE FORGE FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds The Legacy Foundation At Shell Point Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN HERITAGE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds ECHO Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA13.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Larsen Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larsen Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Larsen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph