Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lantern Family Foundation

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$89kHuman Services$74kRecreation & Sports$40kEducation$36kInternational$17kCrime & Legal$10kArts & Culture$8kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $53k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$641
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMEN'S AUXILIARY$23,125
CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$20,000
DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
TCU$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
JESUIT COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL$220
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $1k → 14%CLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $600 → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$147k · 5 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$147k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+23%

Still filing today

40%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WOMEN'S AUXILIARY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $54k
  • WA
    WOMEN'S AUXILIARY - CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $41k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2019–2024 · $33k

Funded once

  • CB
    CATTLE BARON'S BALL
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MEDICAN CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $37k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
2
Physicians for Children

To deliver primary care to children in critically under served areas of the North Central Texas community in a private physician office setting.

—
3
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
4
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
5
Dallas Physician Medical Services for Children Inc

Provide dental, general pediatric, and pediatric sub-specialty services, including, but not limited to emergency department coverage, inpatient coverage, orthopedic surgery, and craniofacial orthodontics regardless of payor source or…

Health
6
Children's Medical Center Research Institute At the Utsw Medical Center

The organization shall undertake, sponsor, and administer basic and/or clinical research in children's health issues.children's medical center research institute at ut southwestern (cri) is a nonprofit research institute built on the…

Health
7
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
8
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
9
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
10
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
11
Anesthesiologists for Children

Provide anesthesia services to patients at children's medical center of dallas. these services are provided without regard to a patient's ability to pay for the services.

—
12
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center; the most unlike its peers is Texas Christian University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOMEN'S AUXILIARY: $54,250 · OtherWOMEN'S AUXILIARYWOMEN'S AUXILIARY - CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $41,000 · OtherWOMEN'S AUXILIARY - CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONCATTLE BARON'S BALL: $40,000 · OtherCATTLE BARON'S BALLCHILDREN'S MEDICAN CENTER FOUNDATION: $36,917 · OtherCHILDREN'S MEDICAN CENTER FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+7 more: $22,120 · Other+7 moreKERSHAW'S CHALLENGE: $17,350 · PhilanthropyKERSHAW'S…THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CRYST…THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION: $4,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JORDA…CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesCLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $1,600 · Human ServicesCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesPATHNORTH INC: $5,335 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · Education
Other$242,287Philanthropy$26,350Health$20,000Human Services$12,600Education$6,335

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKERSHAW'S CHALLENGE: $17,350 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATHNORTH INC: $5,335 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BIRTHDAY PARTY PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER: $1,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PATHNORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
  • Who funds THE JORDAN SPIETH FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BIRTHDAY PARTY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lantern Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lantern Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lantern Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lantern Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lantern Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph