Skip to content
Krishna and Bob Daly Jr Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Krishna and Bob Daly Jr Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$558kHuman Services$418kReligion$145kScience & Tech$105kEducation$36kArts & Culture$20kYouth Development$10kFood & Nutrition$9kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$107
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $406k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $146k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $138k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $105k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 9 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
30

Total granted

$1.2M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+38%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationInternationalCrime & LegalHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    AWAKENING RECOVERY INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $504k · revenue +111%
  • UF
    UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN
    4× · 2017–2020 · $396k · revenue +29%
  • CB
    CHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $40k · revenue +322%

Funded once

  • WA
    WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +71%
  • CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +38%
  • HS
    HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
California Western School of Law

California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…

Education
3
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
6
Communities in Schools of Los Angeles Inc

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…

Youth Development
7
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
8
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
9
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
10
The Buckley School

The buckley school is a dynamic, nurturing learning community committed to equity and inclusion. our innovative teachers and challenging programs inspire creativity, courage, and collaboration. by promoting a balanced development of mind,…

—
11
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
12
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Friends of the Children; the most unlike its peers is Beverly Hills Synagogue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AWAKENING RECOVERY INC: $503,999 · HealthAWAKENING RECOVERY INC+1 more: $4,000 · HealthUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $396,100 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesWESTWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $135,000 · OtherWESTWOOD PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHUCLA LAB SCHOOL: $105,000 · OtherUCLA LAB SCHOOLCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION+20 more: $71,310 · Other+20 moreEVERGREEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $12,500 · EducationHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationTRINITY COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationDUKE ELLINGTON SCHOOL OF THE ARTS PROJECTS: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 · InternationalHAPPY LIFE CHILDREN'S HOME INC DBA HAPPY LIFE MISSION: $2,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 · InternationalCritical Resistance: $5,000 · Crime & LegalTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION: $1,000 · Crime & LegalImmigrant Defenders Law Center: $500 · Crime & Legal
Health$507,999Human Services$406,100Other$351,310Education$28,700Arts & Culture$20,000International$8,000Crime & Legal$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAWAKENING RECOVERY INC: $503,999 over 4y, 19% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $396,100 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S BURN FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEVERGREEN COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCritical Resistance: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHARTORG: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCLAREMATRIX: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RON FINLEY PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE ELLINGTON SCHOOL OF THE ARTS PROJECTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $625 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetImmigrant Defenders Law Center: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Morgan Stanley Global…Silicon Valley Commun…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
California Community FoundationCA14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Krishna and Bob Daly Jr Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Krishna and Bob Daly Jr Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Krishna and Bob Daly Jr Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Krishna and Bob Daly Jr Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Krishna and Bob Daly Jr’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home