Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Krancer Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$303k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.

Health$991kReligion$568kHuman Services$491kYouth Development$270kRecreation & Sports$165kArts & Culture$149kHousing & Shelter$121kFood & Nutrition$119kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $138k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$5,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sky's The Limit Fund$65,000
Spectrum Youth & Family Services$30,000
National Alliance on Mental Illness$20,000
Rural Community Transportation Inc$10,000
Alzheimer's Association$10,000
Minding Your Mind$10,000
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention$10,000
Meals on Wheels of Lamoille County Inc$10,000
Homeshare Vermont Inc$7,500
Paws and Claws Inc$5,000
UNRWA USA$5,000
Thurgood Marshall College Fund Inc$5,000
Razom for Ukraine$5,000
Clean Air Task Force$5,000
Copely Hospital$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $854k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%National Indigenous Women's Resource Cen: $4k → 18%Abramson Senior Care Foundation: $100k → 7%Sky's The Limit Fund: $65k → 8%Kee Cha-E-Nar Corporation: $5k → 17%Homeshare Vermont Inc: $8k → 10%Rural Community Transportation Inc: $10k → 12%National Indigenous Women's Resource Cen: $4k → 18%Abramson Senior Care Foundation: $10k → 7%Spectrum Youth & Family Services: $30k → 10%National Indigenous Women's Resource Center: $4k → 18%SKYS THE LIMIT FUND: $65k → 8%SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 10%National Indigenous Women's Resource Cen: $4k → 18%SKYS THE LIMIT FUND: $65k → 8%SPECTRUM INC: $25k → 10%SKYS THE LIMIT FUND: $65k → 8%SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 10%SKYS THE LIMIT FUND: $65k → 8%SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 10%SKYS THE LIMIT FUND: $50k → 8%Spectrum Youth & Family Services: $25k → 10%SPECTRUM INC: $20k → 10%Spectrum Youth and Family Services: $5k → 10%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $15k → 7%Project HOME: $15k → 22%Project HOME: $15k → 22%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $15k → 7%Project HOME: $15k → 22%Project HOME: $15k → 22%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $15k → 7%Project Home: $15k → 22%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $15k → 7%Jewish Family & Childrens of Greater Philadelphia: $10k → 22%MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
TN
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 56 repeat orgs$445k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

56 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
21

Total granted

$3.0M
$352k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+6%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationArts & CultureInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND
    6× · 2019–2025 · $375k · revenue +145%
  • SY
    SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $180k · revenue +55%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
    3× · 2019–2021 · $150k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • AS
    ABRAMSON SENIOR CARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $110k · revenue +5%
  • ST
    Sky's The Limit
    one grant, 2024 · $65k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
5
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
6
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
8
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
9
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
10
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
11
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
12
Leadingage Inc

The mission of leadingage is to be the trusted voice for aging. our 6,000+ members and partners include nonprofit organizations representing the entire field of aging services, 38 state associations, hundreds of businesses, consumer…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League and the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Environmental Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersPregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Animal Rescue and ShelterYouth Sports ProgramsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Developmental Disabilities …Policy Research and AdvocacyVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/69
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,496

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/69
Grantees still filing
45/69
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Abramson Center for Jewish Life — $568,000 · OtherAbramson Center for Jewish LifePOLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF — $135,000 · OtherPOLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OFBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC — $110,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INCALS Association Greater Philadelphia Cha — $100,000 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL — $100,000 · OtherThe Salvation Army — $75,000 · OtherSky's The Limit — $65,000 · Other+51 more — $722,991 · Other+51 moreSKY'S THE LIMIT FUND — $375,000 · Human ServicesSKY'S THE LIMIT FUNDSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $180,000 · Human ServicesSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY S…ABRAMSON SENIOR CARE FOUNDATION — $110,000 · Human ServicesABRAMSON SENIOR CARE FOUNDA…PROJECT HOME — $75,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMEMONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT — $65,000 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY P…+6 more — $66,832 · Human Services+6 moreAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $70,000 · HealthAMERICAN FO…MINDING YOUR MIND — $70,000 · HealthMINDING YOU…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $44,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…American Heart Association Inc — $27,000 · HealthAmerican He…Ronald McDonald House Global — $25,000 · HealthRonald McDo…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthTHE CHILDRE…NAMI National — $20,000 · HealthNAMI Nation…Copley Health Systems Inc — $20,000 · HealthCopley Heal…ALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC — $20,000 · HealthALS UNITED …+3 more — $24,999 · Health+3 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentPolice Athletic League Of Philadelphia — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $60,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance — $34,000 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $70,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $16,332 · Civil RightsTransgender Law Center — $5,000 · Civil RightsDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $45,000 · AnimalsPAWS AND CLAWS ANIMAL ADOPTION AND CARE — $23,332 · AnimalsNORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE INC — $15,000 · AnimalsThe Street Dog Coalition — $5,000 · Animals
Other$1,875,991Human Services$871,832Health$345,999Youth Development$160,000Food & Nutrition$104,000Civil Rights$91,332Animals$88,332

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSKY'S THE LIMIT FUND — $375,000 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $180,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetABRAMSON SENIOR CARE FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC — $110,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT HOME — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMINDING YOUR MIND — $70,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT — $65,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Merchants Fund of Philadelphia — $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $44,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLELEKA FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPhilabundance — $34,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $27,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPark City Performances — $24,999 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS AND CLAWS ANIMAL ADOPTION AND CARE — $23,332 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetWOMEN'S COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROJECT — $21,332 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund — $21,332 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC — $21,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNAMI National — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCopley Health Systems Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNational Alliance On Mental Illness — $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetUKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $18,332 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $18,332 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF THE DELAWARE VALLEY — $17,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC — $17,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $16,332 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH LAW CENTER — $16,332 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNative American Heritage Association — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStowe Community Fund Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TURNING POINT INC — $13,333 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER — $12,499 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $11,667 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC — $11,667 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTOWE RESCUE SQUAD INC — $10,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetRural Community Transportation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPolice Athletic League Of Philadelphia — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ABRAMSON SENIOR CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds MINDING YOUR MIND ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds The Merchants Fund of Philadelphia ↗
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LELEKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds WILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Park City Performances ↗
  • Who funds PAWS AND CLAWS ANIMAL ADOPTION AND CARE ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
  • Who funds THE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds Copley Health Systems Inc ↗
  • Who funds National Alliance On Mental Illness ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community…The Philadelphia Foun…Phillies Charities IncThe Daniel B and Flor…The Gordon Charter Fo…The Patricia Kind Fam…The Wawa Foundation I…Wsfs Cares FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…Vanguard Charitable E…Chubb Charitable Foun…Shell USA Company Fou…
The Vermont Community FoundationVT17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Phillies Charities Inc · The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · The Wawa Foundation Inc · Wsfs Cares Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Krancer Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Rural Community Transportation Inc — 64% of income from government
  • Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc — 52% of income from government
  • Homeshare Vermont Inc — 32% of income from government
  • Copley Health Systems Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Copley Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Krancer Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Krancer Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines