Skip to content

· Private foundation

Koch Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$83kHealth$74kCrime & Legal$68kFood & Nutrition$40kPhilanthropy$36kArts & Culture$29kCivil Rights$21kHuman Services$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$895k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$10,000
ACRES FOR JOY INC$8,000
VICTORY CHURCHNEW LONDON$7,000
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA$6,000
NORTH RIDGE CHURCH$5,000
MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY$4,500
MINNESOTA SAINTS CHORALE FDN$4,000
NEWLIFE CHURCH$4,000
MEMORY LANE FARM INC$4,000
CROSS THE DIVIDE$2,000
CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT$2,000
FEED MY PEOPLE$2,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTHERN DOOR CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 8%Scholl Comunity Impact Group: $2k → 10%Scholl Comunity Impact Group: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
CA
UT
VA
MD
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$344k · 19 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
12

Total granted

$344k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+5%

Still filing today

47%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $68k · revenue +95%
  • ML
    MEMORY LANE FARM INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $27k · revenue +45%
  • DS
    Down Syndrome Association of Minnesota
    3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • MM
    MINNESOTA MORMON CHORALE FDN
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • UW
    United Way
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hannah Center Inc

Shelter for pregnant women

—
2
Hope Center Inc

The Hope Center seeks out and teams with volunteers from congregations of many faiths.The Center is committed to serving people in need in Waukesha County, Wisconsin through financial assistance, food, child care, clothing and…

—
3
Milwaukee Center for Children and Youth Inc

To end suffering of abused children in milwaukee county through comprehensive advocacy, education, and supportive services that heal trauma, build resilience, nurture the ability to thrive, and create a path toward eradicating the epidemic…

Human Services
4
Manitowoc County Domestic Violence Center Inc

To provide shelter, crisis intervention, and supportive services for survivors of domestic and sexual abuse and their families, with a commitment to safety, respect and promoting self-determination.

Crime & Legal
5
North Country Independent Living Inc

To empower people with disabilities

Human Services
6
Impact Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Services Inc

To provide services which heighten awareness, prevent alcohol and other drug abuse, and help people seek information or assistance to change their lives, for good.

Health
7
Wisconsin Rapids Family Center Inc

Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.

—
8
Child Care Centers of Marshfield Inc

The organization's primary mission is to provide child care and a child and adult care food program for the city of marshfield and the surrounding communities.

Human Services
9
Community Initiatives of Wisconsin

Strengthening communities through mental health support, workforce development, and healthy food access.

Human Services
10
Waushara County Food Pantry Inc

We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.

Food & Nutrition
11
Wisconsin Horse Alliance
—
12
The Milwaukee Women's Center Inc

The mission of the milwaukee women's center, inc. is to provide innovative, culturally competent holistic care that will empower men, women, and children to live safe, independent, and healthy lives.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Agape Help Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VICTORY CHURCHNEW LONDON: $44,000 · OtherVICTORY CHURCHNEW LONDONNORTH RIDGE CHURCH: $21,000 · OtherNORTH RIDGE CHURCHMINNESOTA SAINTS CHORALE FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherMINNESOTA SAINTS CHORALE FOUNDATIONFEED MY PEOPLE INC: $13,000 · OtherFEED MY PEOPLE INCTHE FAMILY: $11,000 · OtherTHE FAMILYANGEL ON MY SHOULDER LTD: $8,000 · OtherCROSS THE DIVIDE: $7,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHURCH FISH CREEK: $6,000 · OtherMINNESOTA MORMON CHORALE FDN: $6,000 · Other+16 more: $37,500 · Other+16 moreWISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $67,500 · Crime & LegalWISCONSIN COMMUNITY …ACRES FOR JOY INC: $38,000 · HealthACRES FOR JOY INCDown Syndrome Association of Minnesota: $22,500 · HealthDown Syndrome Asso…MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY: $24,500 · PhilanthropyMARSHFIEL…MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · PhilanthropyMARSHFIEL…MEMORY LANE FARM INC: $27,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIERCE FREEDOM INC: $14,000 · Civil RightsSCHOLL COMMUNITY IMPACT GROUP INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$172,500Crime & Legal$67,500Health$60,500Philanthropy$33,500Youth Development$27,000Civil Rights$14,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $67,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetACRES FOR JOY INC: $38,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetMEMORY LANE FARM INC: $27,000 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY: $24,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetDown Syndrome Association of Minnesota: $22,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFIERCE FREEDOM INC: $14,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANGEL ON MY SHOULDER LTD: $8,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetSCHOLL COMMUNITY IMPACT GROUP INC: $4,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetAgape Help Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND EMBRACE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHIRLEYS HOUSE OF HOPE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ACRES FOR JOY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORY LANE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds Down Syndrome Association of Minnesota ↗
  • Who funds FIERCE FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL ON MY SHOULDER LTD ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLL COMMUNITY IMPACT GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds Agape Help Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND EMBRACE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHIRLEYS HOUSE OF HOPE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Xcel Energy FoundationMN16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Nelson-Jameson Foundation Inc · Eau Claire Community Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Koch Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Koch Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Koch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph