· Private foundation
Koch Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $10,000 |
| ACRES FOR JOY INC | $8,000 |
| VICTORY CHURCHNEW LONDON | $7,000 |
| DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA | $6,000 |
| NORTH RIDGE CHURCH | $5,000 |
| MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY | $4,500 |
| NEWLIFE CHURCH | $4,000 |
| MINNESOTA SAINTS CHORALE FDN | $4,000 |
| MEMORY LANE FARM INC | $4,000 |
| CROSS THE DIVIDE | $2,000 |
| CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT | $2,000 |
| FEED MY PEOPLE | $2,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $1,500 |
| MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| THE FAMILY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC7× · 2019–2025 · $68k · revenue +95%
- MLMEMORY LANE FARM INC7× · 2019–2025 · $27k · revenue +45%
- DSDown Syndrome Association of Minnesota3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- MMMINNESOTA MORMON CHORALE FDNone grant, 2019 · $6k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $3k
- UWUnited Wayone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Shelter for pregnant women
The Hope Center seeks out and teams with volunteers from congregations of many faiths.The Center is committed to serving people in need in Waukesha County, Wisconsin through financial assistance, food, child care, clothing and…
To end suffering of abused children in milwaukee county through comprehensive advocacy, education, and supportive services that heal trauma, build resilience, nurture the ability to thrive, and create a path toward eradicating the epidemic…
To provide shelter, crisis intervention, and supportive services for survivors of domestic and sexual abuse and their families, with a commitment to safety, respect and promoting self-determination.
To empower people with disabilities
To provide services which heighten awareness, prevent alcohol and other drug abuse, and help people seek information or assistance to change their lives, for good.
Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.
The organization's primary mission is to provide child care and a child and adult care food program for the city of marshfield and the surrounding communities.
Strengthening communities through mental health support, workforce development, and healthy food access.
We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.
The mission of the milwaukee women's center, inc. is to provide innovative, culturally competent holistic care that will empower men, women, and children to live safe, independent, and healthy lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Agape Help Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ACRES FOR JOY INC ↗
- Who funds MEMORY LANE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds Down Syndrome Association of Minnesota ↗
- Who funds FIERCE FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds FEED MY PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANGEL ON MY SHOULDER LTD ↗
- Who funds SCHOLL COMMUNITY IMPACT GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds Agape Help Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND EMBRACE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SHIRLEYS HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Nelson-Jameson Foundation Inc · Eau Claire Community Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Koch Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.