Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nelson-Jameson Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$324k
Granted FY2025still arriving
56
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Education$258kRecreation & Sports$239kPhilanthropy$120kArts & Culture$72kHuman Services$33kPublic Benefit$24kCommunity Improvement$16kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k47 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $154k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$1,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$49k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILL CREEK YOUTH FOUNDATION$100,000
UWRF-FOUNDATION$35,000
MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$23,550
UW - FOUNDATION$22,500
Individual grant recipient$20,500
AMERICAN PLAYERS THEATRE$20,250
MARSHFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT$12,333
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO$10,000
MARSHFIELD ROTARY FOUNDATION$10,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT$7,500
CITY OF MARSHFIELD$7,004
SOUP OR SOCKS INC$5,500
HENDRICKSON FOUNDATION$5,000
MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY$5,000
MID-STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$3,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WE LOVE BALLOONING INC: $500 → 11%SHARP LITERACY INC: $500 → 17%BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC: $500 → 12%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT: $8k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $128 → 14%SOUP OR SOCKS INC: $6k → 11%SOUP OR SOCKS: $6k → 11%COMPANION DAY SERVICES: $5k → 11%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 11%COMPANION DAY SERVICES INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
DC
OK
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$699k · 34 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
34

Total granted

$699k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

44%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthRecreation & SportsInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $63k · revenue +39%
  • American Players Theatre of Wisconsin Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $61k · revenue +25%
  • SO
    SOUP OR SOCKS INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $11k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • UF
    UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION (UW MARSHFIELD)
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CC
    CHESTNUT CENTER FOR THE ARTS
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • CO
    CITY OF MARSHFIELD-JURUSTIC PARK
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marshall Waterloo Food Pantry Inc

The mission of the marshall waterloo food pantry in wisconsin is to ensure that everyone facing food insecurity in their community can access short-term food assistance while fostering hope and dignity. we believe no one should go hungry.

Food & Nutrition
2
Wisconsin Milk Marketing Board Inc

To help grow the demand for wisconsin milk by providing programs that enhance the competitiveness of the wisconsin dairy industry.

3
Markesan Historical Society
4
Madison Area Rehabilitation Centers Inc

Marc, inc. advocates for the full inclusion of all individuals with disabilities in the life of their community. we do so by fostering opportunities for individuals with disabilities to develop a sense of self-worth and dignity, while…

5
Wisconsin Center for Nursing Inc

The mission of wisconsin center for nursing, inc. is to assure an adequate, well-prepared and diverse nurse workforce for the people of wisconsin. the work of the wisconsin center for nursing continues to be focused in five core nursing…

Arts & Culture
6
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
7
Fondy Food Center Inc

He fondy food center connects greater milwaukee to local, fresh food- from farm to market to table - so that children learn better, adults live healthier, and communities celebrate cultural food traditions.

Food & Nutrition
8
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
9
The Wausaukee Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Madison Community Foundation

Madison community foundation will engage greater madison in philanthropy to advance a more vibrant and equitable community.

Philanthropy
11
Community Memorial Hospital of Menomonee Falls Inc

To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.

Health
12
Medical Society of Milwaukee Foundation Inc
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is We Love Ballooning Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Cancer Support OrganizationsUnited Way FederationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Health CentersLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Classical Music EnsemblesVeteran Support ServicesYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsFood Pantries & AssistancePublic University Foundatio…Community FoundationsCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%8%<5yr12%10%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr16%20%35–55yr19%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%42%<5yr12%1%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr16%18%35–55yr19%16%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 42% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/54
the rest of the field
8%
3,022/36,472

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
18/50
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UWRF-FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherUWRF-FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY — $67,982 · OtherUNITED WAYUNIVERSITY OF IDAHO — $43,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IDAHOMARSHFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT — $38,000 · OtherMARSHFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient — $30,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF MARSHFIELD — $24,135 · OtherCITY OF MARSHFIELD+61 more — $117,559 · Other+61 moreMILL CREEK YOUTH FOUNDATION CORPORATION — $200,000 · Recreation & SportsMILL CREEK YOUTH FOUNDATION …THE HENDRICKSON FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $6,500 · Recreation & SportsUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $62,500 · EducationUNIVERSIT…MID-STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $3,500 · Education+5 more — $1,305 · EducationAmerican Players Theatre of Wisconsin Inc — $60,750 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $1,500 · Arts & CultureMARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $55,350 · PhilanthropyMARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY — $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropySOUP OR SOCKS INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION — $7,500 · Human ServicesCOMPANION DAY SERVICES INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $5,000 · Human Services+4 more — $1,628 · Human ServicesALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $3,409 · HealthJOLENES ANGELS INC — $1,500 · HealthTOUGH ENOUGH TO WEAR PINK INC — $1,500 · HealthMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Health+2 more — $220 · Health
Other$401,176Recreation & Sports$216,500Education$67,305Arts & Culture$62,250Philanthropy$61,350Human Services$31,128Health$7,129

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMILL CREEK YOUTH FOUNDATION CORPORATION — $200,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $62,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Players Theatre of Wisconsin Inc — $60,750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $55,350 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMARSHFIELD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $13,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetSOUP OR SOCKS INC — $11,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE HENDRICKSON FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPANION DAY SERVICES INC — $6,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA PET SHELTER INC — $5,600 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSPENCER YOUTH RECREATIONS INC — $5,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMID-STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $3,409 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET MARSHFIELD INC — $3,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetHANNAH CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHIRLEYS HOUSE OF HOPE — $2,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNURU INTERNATIONAL — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOLENES ANGELS INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTOUGH ENOUGH TO WEAR PINK INC — $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMARSHFIELD TIGER BOOSTER CLUB INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLUCILLE TACK CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFIRE FIGHTERS 1021 - MARSHFIELD — $1,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARP LITERACY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITY ALLIANCE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO INC — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWE LOVE BALLOONING INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWILDWOOD PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC OF MARSHFIELD WISCONSIN — $500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEVER FORGOTTEN HONOR FLIGHT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GRANT COUNTY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $257 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN COUNTY DAIRY PROMOTIONS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN COUNTY FIRST ROBOTICS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJAIL GUITAR DOORS — $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $128 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILL CREEK YOUTH FOUNDATION CORPORATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American Players Theatre of Wisconsin Inc
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SOUP OR SOCKS INC
  • Who funds THE HENDRICKSON FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds COMPANION DAY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA PET SHELTER INC
  • Who funds SPENCER YOUTH RECREATIONS INC
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY
  • Who funds PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds MID-STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds MAIN STREET MARSHFIELD INC
  • Who funds HANNAH CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Umhoefer Foundation IncWI28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Umhoefer Foundation Inc · Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Weber Charitable Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Woodtrust Charitable Foundation Inc · Koch Charitable Trust · Marshfield Area United Way

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nelson-Jameson Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nelson-Jameson Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Nelson-Jameson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph