Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Knott Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$651k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.3MScience & Tech$688kArts & Culture$537kHealth$448kHuman Services$276kReligion$215kYouth Development$200kAnimals$186kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $402k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLOISUKUT CONSERVANCY EMPOWERS AFRICA$100,634
COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB$100,000
SCAN-HARBOR$51,300
THE ALFRED E SMITH MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$50,000
PROJECT NYAME NSA$50,000
FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE$50,000
ST JOHN'S OF LATTINGTOWN$40,000
CARON TREATMENT CENTER$25,000
WINE TO WATER - BOONE NC$25,000
PENNVET$25,000
UNC ARTS & SCIENCES$25,000
NORTHWELL HOSPITAL AT GLEN COVE$25,000
THE PANGOLIN PROJECT ACCOUNT$15,000
READ AHEAD$10,000
COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE: $50k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
SD
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
DE
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 21 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
35

Total granted

$3.1M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+26%

Still filing today

57%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $390k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationEnvironmentAnimalsInternationalScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $673k · revenue +9%
  • SI
    SCAN-HARBOR INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $226k · revenue +35%
  • TT
    THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $118k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • US
    UNC-ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $410k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS HARBOR INC
    one grant, 2018 · $200k · revenue -42%
  • OW
    OLOISUKUT WILD PARTNERSHIP LTD VIA EMPOWERS AFRICA
    one grant, 2023 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
5
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
6
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
12
South Shore University Hospital

South shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Harbor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsSubstance Abuse TreatmentElementary Literacy TutoringFood Pantries & AssistanceWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Fallen First Responder Supp…Education Equity LeadershipCommunity Health CentersLand Conservation Organizat…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%42%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%2%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr19%4%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%72%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,728

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $893,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLNYAME — $450,000 · OtherNYAMEUNC-ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATION — $410,000 · OtherUNC-ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATIONSCAN-HARBOR INC — $225,800 · OtherSCAN-HARBOR INCBOYS AND GIRLS HARBOR INC — $200,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS HARBOR INCST ANDREWS SCHOOL — $146,848 · OtherST JOHN'S OF LATTINGTOWN — $127,500 · Other+49 more — $1,022,431 · Other+49 moreCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $673,000 · Science & TechCOLD SPRING HARB…THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $117,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $25,000 · EducationThe Pierpont Morgan Library — $24,150 · EducationNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $15,000 · EducationEmory University — $10,000 · Education+2 more — $2,000 · EducationFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC — $75,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 · HealthINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CLUBHOUSE DEVELOPMENT INC — $15,000 · Health+2 more — $750 · HealthAGAPE GLOBAL LTD — $100,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $40,000 · InternationalFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC — $15,000 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimited Inc — $10,000 · EnvironmentPLANTING FIELDS FOUNDATION — $5,500 · Environment
Other$3,475,579Science & Tech$673,000Education$193,650Health$165,750International$140,000Human Services$50,000Environment$30,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $673,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSCAN-HARBOR INC — $225,800 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS HARBOR INC — $200,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $117,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAGAPE GLOBAL LTD — $100,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC — $75,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pierpont Morgan Library — $24,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CLUBHOUSE DEVELOPMENT INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOld Westbury Gardens Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREAD AHEAD INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEmory University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANTING FIELDS FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREP FOR PREP — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN VALE SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILL NECK FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
  • Who funds SCAN-HARBOR INC
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS HARBOR INC
  • Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
  • Who funds AGAPE GLOBAL LTD
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC
  • Who funds FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds The Pierpont Morgan Library
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CLUBHOUSE DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society
  • Who funds THE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hugh and Patricia Okane Foundation Co Hugh OkaneFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hugh and Patricia Okane Foundation Co Hugh Okane · The New York Community Trust · Herbert L Smith III Family Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Knott Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Knott Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Knott Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph