· Private foundation
Hugh and Patricia Okane Foundation Co Hugh Okane
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k61 grants · $181k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $162k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $241k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PIPING ROCK SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $101,000 |
| BOSTON COLLEGE | $80,000 |
| BANNER LAKE CLUB | $60,000 |
| THE GREEN VALE SCHOOL | $35,000 |
| HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST | $30,000 |
| JUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CENTER FOUND | $30,000 |
| EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL | $12,500 |
| THE LANGLEY SCHOOL | $12,165 |
| GLEN COVE BOYS GIRLS CLUB | $12,000 |
| CHURCH OF STDOMINIC | $10,000 |
| DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME | $10,000 |
| NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $8,500 |
| PARTNERS IN HEALTH | $8,060 |
| CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE9× · 2017–2025 · $480k · revenue +70%- TLTHE LANGLEY SCHOOL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $175k · revenue +47%
- TBTHE BANNER LAKE CLUB INC7× · 2019–2025 · $163k · revenue +314%
Funded once
- SDST DOMINIC PARISH FUNDone grant, 2017 · $50k
- TBTHE BOWERY MISSION SUPPORT CENTERone grant, 2020 · $25k
- PFPennys Flight Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +220%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hudson Guildinc and the most unlike its peers is Samadi Robotics Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 152 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GREEN VALE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE LANGLEY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE BANNER LAKE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds PIPING ROCK SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GLEN COVE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB AT LINCOLN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds ST GEORGE'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE NORTH SHORE LAND ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CLIFTON INC ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds BROOKS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds PLANTING FIELDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ainslie Foundation · Legatus Foundation · Colket Family Foundation · St Clair Charitable Trust · CMB Foundation · John R & Hope Reese Foundation · The David and Elizabeth Long Foundation · Norwood Foundation Inc · The Krimendahlsaint-Amand Foundation · Donald Grant & Ann Martin Calder Foundat · Nelson Mead Fund · Stephanie & Lawrence Flinn Jrcharitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hugh and Patricia Okane Foundation Co Hugh Okane funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Covenant House New Jersey Inc — 34% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc — 10% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- The Banner Lake Club Inc — 1% of income from government
- Share Inc — 1% of income from government
- Exceptional Care for Children — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Montclair Ambulance Unit — 0% of income from government
- Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hugh and Patricia Okane Foundation Co Hugh Okane?
Find your warmest path to Hugh and Patricia Okane Foundation Co Hugh Okane through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.