Skip to content
Klintworth Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Klintworth Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$402k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$206k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$956kHealth$369kReligion$213kEducation$209kInternational$139kArts & Culture$88kHuman Services$69kCommunity Improvement$66kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $256k
$2,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE ALLIANCE$206,000
PARK CITY COMMUNITY CHURCH$50,000
OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIOS$25,000
GREATER GOOD CHARITIES$25,000
WORLDREADER$20,000
MAISON CHANCE USA$20,000
ROSE INITIATIVES INC$20,000
CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY$5,000
MAKER UNION$5,000
BROADWAY CARES$3,000
KPCW$2,500
ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROG$2,500
CHARGER PRIDE FOUNDATION$2,500
PONHEARY LY FOUNDATION$2,500
PEOPLE'S HEALTH CLINIC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARVEST HOME: $1k → 14%COMMON GOOD: $5k → 14%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 11%A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%AMERICA'S KIDS BELONG: $2k → 9%HARVEST HOME: $1k → 14%COMMON GOOD: $2k → 14%JOHN 3-16 MISSION: $750 → 15%CASA PACIFICA: $2k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $1k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $1k → 10%CASA PACIFICA: $1k → 10%RAISING HOPE INC: $2k → 10%RAISINGHOPE INC: $2k → 10%RAISINGHOPE INC: $2k → 10%LUCKY PROJECT: $5k → 5%RAISINGHOPE INC: $2k → 10%RAISING HOPE INC: $1k → 10%VENTURA COUNTY RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 10%LUCKY PROJECT: $1k → 5%ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $1k → 5%ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $1k → 5%ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
IL
MI
NY
NV
SD
IA
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
DE
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 44 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
28

Total granted

$2.1M
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
0%

Still filing today

68%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthEducationReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GG
    GREATER GOOD CHARITIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $905k · revenue +130%
  • MC
    Maison Chance USA Inc
    2× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +12%
  • PA
    President and Fellows of Middlebury College
    2× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LITERACY PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +22%
  • BD
    BOB DYLAN CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • AC
    A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
2
The Christmas Box International

The christmas box international partners with local, national and international communities and groups to prevent child abuse and to improve the quality of life for children, teens and young adults who have been abused, neglected or are…

Community Improvement
3
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
4
Kidvantage

KidVantage helps kids be safe, nourished, and healthy by providing diapers, formula, car seats, clothing, and more. KidVantage protects and promotes healthy development for kids (through age 12) by collecting, purchasing, and distributing…

Human Services
5
Wayfinder Family Services

The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…

Human Services
6
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
7
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
8
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
9
Variety - the Childrens Charity International

We empower children who are sick, disadvantaged, or living with disabilities through life-changing programs that provide medical care, mobility, education, and support to live without limits.

International
10
Raise the Future

Every young person is connected to at least one strong, stable, and caring adult who meets their unique needs.

Human Services
11
People Helping People

People helping people (php) is dedicated to reducing the number of children living in poverty by teaching low-income women, primarily single moms, how to earn a living wage. each year, 1,000 prospective clients enroll in our employment…

Human Services
12
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Good Charities; the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/53
Grantees still filing
33/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $905,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER GOOD CHARITIESMaison Chance USA Inc: $40,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPARK CITY COMMUNITY CHURCH: $117,000 · OtherPARK CITY COMMUNITY CHURCHWORLDREADER: $110,000 · OtherWORLDREADERTHE WELLSPRING CHURCH CV: $95,000 · OtherTHE WELLSPRING CHURCH CVUNIVERSITY OF UTAH DEVELOPMENT OFFICE: $42,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH DEVELOPMENT…PONHEARY LY FOUNDATION: $24,500 · OtherROSE INITIATIVES INC: $20,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $30,000 · Other+35 more: $156,250 · Other+35 moreTHE HOPE ALLIANCE: $306,000 · InternationalTHE HOPE ALLIANCEWORLDREADERORG: $141,000 · InternationalWORLDREADERORG+4 more: $5,500 · InternationalOLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCommunity Wireless of Park City: $12,500 · Arts & CulturePositively Arts: $7,000 · Arts & CultureFrom The Heart Productions: $2,500 · Arts & CulturePresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $35,000 · EducationKENYAN URITHI EDUCATION FUND: $7,000 · EducationPark City Education Foundation: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · EducationRAISINGHOPE INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMON GOOD INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesLucky Project: $6,000 · Human ServicesA CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families: $5,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CONEJO VALLEY: $3,000 · Human ServicesAdopt-A-Native Elder: $3,000 · Human ServicesAmericas Kids Belong: $2,000 · Human ServicesHarvest Home Inc: $2,000 · Human Services+3 more: $2,750 · Human ServicesPeople's Health Clicnic: $21,000 · HealthNAMI National: $15,000 · HealthBUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Health+3 more: $3,000 · Health
Philanthropy$946,000Other$594,750International$452,500Arts & Culture$47,000Education$46,000Human Services$44,750Health$44,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $905,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HOPE ALLIANCE: $306,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetWORLDREADERORG: $141,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMaison Chance USA Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic: $21,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNAMI National: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Wireless of Park City: $12,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LITERACY PROJECT: $12,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetHORIZON INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRAISINGHOPE INC: $9,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSUPPORT FOR THE KIDS: $8,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetMAKER UNION: $8,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetPositively Arts: $7,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE COMMON GOOD INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKENYAN URITHI EDUCATION FUND: $7,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetLucky Project: $6,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetMANY MANSIONS: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Promise - Salt Lake: $5,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetA CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPET SUSTAINABILITY COALITION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONEJO COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $4,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CONEJO VALLEY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAdopt-A-Native Elder: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmericas Kids Belong: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMy Refuge House: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHarvest Home Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPark City Education Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWERING LIVES INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBISSELL Pet Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCADDIES FOR KIDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANAGED ACCESS TO CHILD HEALTH INC D/B/A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILD HEALTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAINUP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER GOOD CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WORLDREADERORG ↗
  • Who funds Maison Chance USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
  • Who funds OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO INC ↗
  • Who funds People's Health Clicnic ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds Community Wireless of Park City ↗
  • Who funds THE LITERACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HORIZON INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds RAISINGHOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORT FOR THE KIDS ↗
  • Who funds MAKER UNION ↗
  • Who funds Positively Arts ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMON GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds KENYAN URITHI EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Lucky Project ↗
  • Who funds MANY MANSIONS ↗
  • Who funds Family Promise - Salt Lake ↗
  • Who funds BUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PET SUSTAINABILITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Casa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sherwood Country Club…Promontory FoundationThe McGuire Family Fo…Sad Foundation IncLarry H Miller and Ga…Conrad N Hilton Found…Park City Community F…Making a Difference F…Sorenson Legacy Found…Rancho Santa Fe Found…Mightycause Charitabl…The Annenberg Foundat…
Sherwood Country Club Charitable FoundationCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sherwood Country Club Charitable Foundation · Promontory Foundation · The McGuire Family Foundation · Sad Foundation Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Park City Community Foundation · Making a Difference Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Klintworth Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Klintworth Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Managed Access to Child Health Inc D/B/a Partnership for Child Health: 13% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Klintworth Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home