· Private foundation
Klintworth Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $256k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOPE ALLIANCE | $206,000 |
| PARK CITY COMMUNITY CHURCH | $50,000 |
| OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIOS | $25,000 |
| GREATER GOOD CHARITIES | $25,000 |
| WORLDREADER | $20,000 |
| ROSE INITIATIVES INC | $20,000 |
| MAISON CHANCE USA | $20,000 |
| CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY | $5,000 |
| MAKER UNION | $5,000 |
| BROADWAY CARES | $3,000 |
| ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROG | $2,500 |
| KPCW | $2,500 |
| CHARGER PRIDE FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| PONHEARY LY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| FIRST TEE | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GGGREATER GOOD CHARITIES6× · 2020–2025 · $905k · revenue +130%
- MCMaison Chance USA Inc2× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +12%
- PAPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College2× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- TLTHE LITERACY PROJECTone grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +22%
- BDBOB DYLAN CENTERone grant, 2021 · $7k
- PSPET SUSTAINABILITY COALITIONone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
The christmas box international partners with local, national and international communities and groups to prevent child abuse and to improve the quality of life for children, teens and young adults who have been abused, neglected or are…
Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.
KidVantage helps kids be safe, nourished, and healthy by providing diapers, formula, car seats, clothing, and more. KidVantage protects and promotes healthy development for kids (through age 12) by collecting, purchasing, and distributing…
The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
We empower children who are sick, disadvantaged, or living with disabilities through life-changing programs that provide medical care, mobility, education, and support to live without limits.
Every young person is connected to at least one strong, stable, and caring adult who meets their unique needs.
People helping people (php) is dedicated to reducing the number of children living in poverty by teaching low-income women, primarily single moms, how to earn a living wage. each year, 1,000 prospective clients enroll in our employment…
Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Good Charities and the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER GOOD CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds WORLDREADERORG ↗
- Who funds Maison Chance USA Inc ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
- Who funds OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIO INC ↗
- Who funds People's Health Clicnic ↗
- Who funds NAMI National ↗
- Who funds Community Wireless of Park City ↗
- Who funds THE LITERACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HORIZON INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds RAISINGHOPE INC ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT FOR THE KIDS ↗
- Who funds MAKER UNION ↗
- Who funds THE COMMON GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds KENYAN URITHI EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Positively Arts ↗
- Who funds MANY MANSIONS ↗
- Who funds Lucky Project ↗
- Who funds Family Promise - Salt Lake ↗
- Who funds Casa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families ↗
- Who funds PET SUSTAINABILITY COALITION ↗
- Who funds A CHILD'S HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sherwood Country Club Charitable Foundation · Promontory Foundation · The McGuire Family Foundation · Sad Foundation Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Park City Community Foundation · Making a Difference Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Klintworth Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Managed Access to Child Health Inc D/B/a Partnership for Child Health — 13% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.