Skip to content
King-Porter Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

King-Porter Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$164k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$435kFood & Nutrition$95kAnimals$49kHuman Services$46kCivil Rights$40kCrime & Legal$29kInternational$27kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $98k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAGEBRUSH COMMUNITY CHURCH$25,000
X FACTOR INC$21,000
STUDENT MOBILIZATION INC$18,000
LIFEGATE DENVER$12,000
CHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION FOUNDATION$12,000
NEW MEXICO FAMILY ACTION FOUNDATION$10,000
CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE$8,000
CALLISTO$6,000
HOFFMANTOWN CHURCH$5,000
TURNING POINT USA INC$5,000
PASTORS RESOURCE NETWORK$5,000
AND THEN THERE WERE NONE$5,000
INTENTIONAL LIFE MEDIA$5,000
TURNING POINT USA INC$5,000
NEW MEXICO FAMILY ACTION FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE GRATEFUL GARMENT PROJECT: $3k → 8%THE GRATEFUL GARMENT PROJECT: $3k → 8%THE GRATEFUL GARMENT PROJECT: $3k → 8%NEW MEXICO BOYS & GIRLS RANCHES: $25k → 14%ALBUQUERQUE CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME INC: $3k → 14%ALBUQUERQUE CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME INC: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$585k · 20 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
18

Total granted

$585k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+6%

Still filing today

80%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesAnimalsHealthCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FN
    Feed New Mexico Kids Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $90k · revenue +24%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO DREAM CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $41k · revenue +72%
  • CV
    CHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $32k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • NM
    NEW MEXICO BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -22%
  • MM
    Mir Ministries
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -50%
  • OG
    Oak Grove Classical Academygraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
4
Christians for Biblical Equality

See schedule o.christians for biblical equality (cbe), www.cbeinternational.org, is a 501c3 nonprofit organization comprised of individuals, churches, colleges, seminaries, and organizations, representing more than 100 different…

—
5
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
6
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
7
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
8
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
9
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
10
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
11
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
12
Explore God Network
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Grateful Garment Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
18/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Sagebrush Community Church: $226,000 · OtherSagebrush Community ChurchSTUDENT MOBILIZATION INC: $36,000 · OtherSTUDENT MOBILIZATION INCX FACTOR INC: $21,000 · OtherStudents for Life of America Inc: $16,000 · Other+22 more: $123,920 · Other+22 moreNEW MEXICO DREAM CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE: $41,000 · ReligionNEW MEXICO DREAM C…Mir Ministries: $25,000 · ReligionMir MinistriesNew Mexico Family Action Foundation: $21,100 · ReligionNew Mexico Family …SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,724 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $9,500 · ReligionANSWERS IN GENESIS…NEW HOPE PENINSULA MINISTRIES: $8,000 · ReligionNEW HOPE PENINSULA…CREATION MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL (US) INC: $5,282 · ReligionINTENTIONAL LIFE MEDIA: $5,000 · ReligionFeed New Mexico Kids Inc: $90,000 · Food & NutritionFeed New Mexi…East Mountain Food Pantry Inc dba EMFP: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION: $32,300 · AnimalsANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO: $5,850 · AnimalsNMDOG Inc: $4,850 · AnimalsLos Suenos Community Giving: $3,000 · AnimalsNEW MEXICO BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesThe Grateful Garment Project: $9,000 · Human ServicesALBUQUERQUE CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $4,250 · Human ServicesSOTERIA INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS: $3,000 · Human ServicesDREAM CENTERS OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $17,000 · HealthCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $8,000 · HealthTWLOHA INC: $3,500 · HealthCALLISTO: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$422,920Religion$125,606Food & Nutrition$95,000Animals$46,000Human Services$41,250Health$28,500Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFeed New Mexico Kids Inc: $90,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetNEW MEXICO DREAM CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE: $41,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION: $32,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMir Ministries: $25,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetNew Mexico Family Action Foundation: $21,100 over 2y, 14% of budgetCALLISTO: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetDREAM CENTERS OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $17,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMG INTERNATIONAL INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOak Grove Classical Academy: $14,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,724 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Grateful Garment Project: $9,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEW HOPE PENINSULA MINISTRIES: $8,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO: $5,850 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCREATION MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL (US) INC: $5,282 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEast Mountain Food Pantry Inc dba EMFP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINTENTIONAL LIFE MEDIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNMDOG Inc: $4,850 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetALBUQUERQUE CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $4,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTWLOHA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSusan B Anthony List Education Fund: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community…Chattanooga Christian…Natl Christian Charit…Servant FoundationTexas Instruments Fou…Vanguard Charitable E…Renaissance Charitabl…American Endowment Fo…Raymond James Charita…Donor Advised Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…
Albuquerque Community FoundationNM17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization King-Porter Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from King-Porter Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on King-Porter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home