· Private foundation
King-Porter Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $66k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $98k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAGEBRUSH COMMUNITY CHURCH | $25,000 |
| X FACTOR INC | $21,000 |
| STUDENT MOBILIZATION INC | $18,000 |
| LIFEGATE DENVER | $12,000 |
| CHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| NEW MEXICO FAMILY ACTION FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE | $8,000 |
| CALLISTO | $6,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA INC | $5,000 |
| HOFFMANTOWN CHURCH | $5,000 |
| AND THEN THERE WERE NONE | $5,000 |
| PASTORS RESOURCE NETWORK | $5,000 |
| INTENTIONAL LIFE MEDIA | $5,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA INC | $5,000 |
| NEW MEXICO FAMILY ACTION FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FNFeed New Mexico Kids Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $90k · revenue +24%
- NMNEW MEXICO DREAM CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE3× · 2022–2024 · $41k · revenue +72%
- CVCHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION3× · 2023–2025 · $32k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- NMNEW MEXICO BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -22%
- MMMir Ministriesone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -67%
- OGOak Grove Classical Academygraduatedone grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.
See schedule o.christians for biblical equality (cbe), www.cbeinternational.org, is a 501c3 nonprofit organization comprised of individuals, churches, colleges, seminaries, and organizations, representing more than 100 different…
Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.
Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…
We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.
To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…
Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.
The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…
None
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Grateful Garment Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Feed New Mexico Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO DREAM CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO BOYS AND GIRLS RANCHES INC ↗
- Who funds Mir Ministries ↗
- Who funds New Mexico Family Action Foundation ↗
- Who funds CALLISTO ↗
- Who funds DREAM CENTERS OF COLORADO SPRINGS ↗
- Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
- Who funds AMG INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Oak Grove Classical Academy ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC ↗
- Who funds The Grateful Garment Project ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE PENINSULA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds CREATION MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL (US) INC ↗
- Who funds East Mountain Food Pantry Inc dba EMFP ↗
- Who funds INTENTIONAL LIFE MEDIA ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds NMDOG Inc ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds TWLOHA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization King-Porter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.