Skip to content
Kenneth Kendal King Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kenneth Kendal King Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
115
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$2.8MEmployment$2.2MHousing & Shelter$1.8MCommunity Improvement$1.5MArts & Culture$1.5MEducation$1.2MFood & Nutrition$1.0MYouth Development$893kOther$0
02FY2025 · 115 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $90k
  • $10k–50k76 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.1M
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOMEWARD ALLIANCE$75,000
SECOND CHANCE CENTER INC$75,000
FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$67,500
WORK OPTIONS FOR WOMEN DBA WORK OPT$60,000
SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER$60,000
ACTIVATE WORK INC$60,000
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY WEALTH BUILDIN$50,000
BREAKTHROUGH ALLIANCE OF COLORADO$50,000
ACCESS MODE$50,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN MICROFINANCE INSTITU$50,000
MT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER$50,000
COLORADO VILLAGE COLLABORATIVE$50,000
CEDS FINANCE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
CAPITOL HILL COMMUNITY SERVICES$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE SAVINGS COLLABORATIVE: $55k → 6%STARTUP COLORADO: $25k → 9%HOLYOKE COMMUNITY CHILDCARE INITIAT: $50k → 11%THE SAVINGS COLLABORATIVE: $55k → 6%HANDS OF THE CARPENTER: $200k → 7%HANDS OF THE CARPENTER: $60k → 7%Springs Rescue Mission: $100k → 9%HANDS OF THE CARPENTER: $25k → 7%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 9%SECOND CHANCE CENTER INC: $75k → 10%JEFFCO PROSPERITY PARTNERS: $25k → 7%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 9%SECOND CHANCE CENTER INC: $65k → 10%COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENT: $45k → 9%SECOND CHANCE CENTER INC: $50k → 10%Hands of the Carpenter: $25k → 7%COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENT: $35k → 9%Second Chance Center Inc: $40k → 10%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $30k → 9%Second Chance Center: $40k → 10%COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENT: $30k → 9%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $60k → 12%CEDS FINANCE: $50k → 8%Colorado Springs Child Nursery Centers Inc: $25k → 9%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%VILLAGE EXCHANGE CENTER: $35k → 8%Springs Rescue Mission: $25k → 9%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 12%CEDS FINANCE: $25k → 8%Colorado Springs Child Nursery Centers Inc: $25k → 9%Sister Carmen Community Center: $25k → 12%VILLAGE EXCHANGE CENTER: $25k → 8%PCS FOR PEOPLE: $52k → 12%Bridge House: $50k → 12%DIAKONIA: $25k → 9%Bridge House: $50k → 12%Bridge House: $30k → 12%BRIDGE HOUSE: $25k → 12%MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $30k → 12%Mi Casa Resource Center: $25k → 12%ACTIVATE WORK INC: $60k → 12%ACTIVATE WORK INC: $60k → 12%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $68k → 12%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 12%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 12%Focus Points Family Resource Center: $50k → 12%Warren Village Inc: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
MO
VA
NM
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 141 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

141 repeat relationships: 78 still active in FY2025, 63 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

141
107

Total granted

$13M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+19%

Still filing today

83%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $619k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationEmploymentCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    Goodwill of Colorado
    5× · 2019–2023 · $535k · revenue +30%
  • CH
    Capitol Hill Community Services
    7× · 2019–2025 · $479k · revenue +29% · 34% of their budget
  • LP
    LA PUENTE HOME INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $416k · revenue +374%

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMUNITY AGRICULTURE ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +9%
  • CC
    CHAFFEE COUNTY AND CHAFFEE COUNTY E
    one grant, 2023 · $90k
  • CC
    Catalyst CO WorkLife Partnership
    one grant, 2021 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Thrives

Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.

Community Improvement
2
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
3
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
4
Colorado Fiscal Institute

To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity

Community Improvement
5
Colorado Chamber of Commerce Fka Co Assn of Commerce & Industry

The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…

—
6
Denver Hybrid College

To support college students in innovative, affordable paths to in-demand careers and financial freedom.

Education
7
Colorado Business Roundtable Partners

To perform education and research priorities that work to strengthen Colorado's economic viability. COBRT Partners works to improve the business climate in our state by focusing on key pillars for a sustainable, growing, and global…

Education
8
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
9
Colorado Organization for Latina Opportunity and Reproductive Rights

Colorado organization for latina opportunity and reproductive rights (color) is a community-rooted nonprofit organization that works to enable latinx individuals and their families lead safe, healthy, self-determined lives.

Health
10
Endeavor Colorado

Endeavor colorado is a not-for-profit leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in colorado to catalyze long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region. high-impact…

Community Improvement
11
Denver Community Ventures

To empower low-income families and individuals towards self-sufficiency and independent living.

Housing & Shelter
12
Latino Community Foundation of Colorado Inc

The foundation is a state-based philanthropic foundation - led by latinos and for latinos. the foundation pursues civic, economic, and cultural opportunities that drive a more authentic narrative about latinos in the state and cement a…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Colorado Nonprofit Development Center; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Educational Excellence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

214 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 214 of the 281 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
69
Early backer (in before they grew)
211/214
Grantees still filing
145/214
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA PUENTE HOME INC: $416,000 · OtherLA PUENTE HOME INCTHE ST FRANCIS CENTER: $207,500 · OtherRocky Mountain Microfinance: $220,000 · Other+96 more: $5,081,287 · Other+96 moreSparkHope Automotive: $337,500 · Human ServicesSparkHope AutomotiveSecond Chance Center Inc: $308,000 · Human ServicesSecond Chance Center IncFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $272,500 · Human ServicesFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESO…THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $257,500 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSI…HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC: $175,000 · Human ServicesHOMEWARD ALLIANCE INCBridge House: $165,000 · Human ServicesBridge HouseSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $160,000 · Human ServicesCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $160,000 · Human ServicesVILLAGE EXCHANGE CENTER INC: $127,500 · Human ServicesACTIVATE WORK INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesMI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $110,000 · Human ServicesThe Savings Collaborative: $110,000 · Human Services+23 more: $759,500 · Human Services+23 moreGoodwill of Colorado: $535,000 · EmploymentGoodwill of Co…MT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER: $242,500 · EmploymentMT CARMEL VETE…PRODIGY VENTURES INC: $205,500 · EmploymentPRODIGY VENTUR…Mile High Workshop Inc: $170,000 · EmploymentMile High Work…WORKLIFE PARTNERSHIP: $140,000 · EmploymentWORKLIFE PARTN…WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $130,000 · EmploymentWOMEN'S BEAN P…CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $126,500 · EmploymentCENTER FOR EMP…BAYAUD ENTERPRISES INC: $115,500 · EmploymentBAYAUD ENTERPR…+4 more: $155,500 · Employment+4 moreYOUTH ON RECORD: $150,000 · Arts & CultureYOUTH ON RE…COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $130,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO SY…COLORADO CHILDREN'S CHORALE: $130,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO CH…ACCESS GALLERY: $116,000 · Arts & CultureACCESS GALL…Colorado Museum of Natural History: $115,000 · Arts & CultureColorado Mu…MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $80,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF C…Latino Leadership Institute: $75,000 · Arts & CultureKIDS AT THEIR BEST INC: $72,500 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO BALLET: $70,000 · Arts & CulturePHAMALY THEATRE COMPANY: $70,000 · Arts & CultureLITTLETON TOWN HALL ARTS CENTER: $65,000 · Arts & CultureHeartbeat Denver Inc: $60,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER LYRIC OPERA GUILD: $60,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA COLORADO: $60,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO BUSINESS COMMITTEE FOR THE ARTS: $56,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $147,500 · Arts & Culture+5 moreCOLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $105,000 · EducationEMILY GRIFFITH FOUNDATION: $95,000 · EducationGlobal Center for Cultural Entrepre dba Creative Startups: $75,000 · EducationACCESS MODE: $75,000 · EducationTHE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationSPRINGBOARD CHILD CARE INC: $40,000 · EducationTHE THRIVE NETWORK: $35,000 · EducationTHE ATTAINMENT NETWORK: $30,000 · EducationTACT KIDS INC: $30,000 · EducationDURANGO ADULT EDUCATION CENTER: $27,000 · Education+8 more: $174,000 · EducationCapitol Hill Community Services: $479,300 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY AGRICULTURE ALLIANCE INC: $100,000 · Food & NutritionSAN LUIS VALLEY LOCAL FOODS COALITION: $66,123 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $35,000 · Food & NutritionMOUNTAIN ROOTS FOOD PROJECT: $26,500 · Food & NutritionHOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY: $215,000 · Housing & ShelterPartners in Housing Inc: $112,500 · Housing & ShelterCOLORADO VILLAGE COLLABORATIVE: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPE COMMUNITIES INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE DELORES PROJECT: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterProject Restart Inc: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE INN BETWEEN OF LONGMONT INC: $27,500 · Housing & ShelterURBAN PEAK DENVER: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterHaven House of Montrose Inc: $25,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,924,787Human Services$3,062,500Employment$1,820,500Arts & Culture$1,457,000Education$796,000Food & Nutrition$706,923Housing & Shelter$650,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGoodwill of Colorado: $535,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCapitol Hill Community Services: $479,300 over 7y, 34% of budgetLA PUENTE HOME INC: $416,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetSparkHope Automotive: $337,500 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetSecond Chance Center Inc: $308,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $272,500 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $257,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER: $242,500 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetRocky Mountain Microfinance: $220,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY: $215,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetTHE ST FRANCIS CENTER: $207,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetPRODIGY VENTURES INC: $205,500 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetWORK OPTIONS FOR WOMEN DBA WORK OPTIONS: $192,500 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetHOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC: $175,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMile High Workshop Inc: $170,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetBridge House: $165,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $160,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $160,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetYOUTH ON RECORD: $150,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetWORKLIFE PARTNERSHIP: $140,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCROSSPURPOSE: $132,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $130,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $130,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CHORALE: $130,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetVILLAGE EXCHANGE CENTER INC: $127,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $126,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetACTIVATE WORK INC: $120,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetACCESS GALLERY: $116,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetBAYAUD ENTERPRISES INC: $115,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY WEALTH BUILDING: $115,500 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetColorado Museum of Natural History: $115,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPartners in Housing Inc: $112,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetMI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $110,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetThe Savings Collaborative: $110,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetCOLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $105,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSPRING INSTITUTE FOR INTERCULTURAL LEARNING: $104,537 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCOLORADO VILLAGE COLLABORATIVE: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSOLAR ENERGY INTERNATIONAL: $100,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY AGRICULTURE ALLIANCE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetBreakthrough Alliance of Colorado Inc: $100,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetMANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN: $96,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $95,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetEMILY GRIFFITH FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY GREAT OUTDOORS: $92,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetTHE MASTER'S APPRENTICE INC: $90,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetWEST COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $85,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER: $85,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Goodwill of Colorado ↗
  • Who funds Capitol Hill Community Services ↗
  • Who funds LA PUENTE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds SparkHope Automotive ↗
  • Who funds Second Chance Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Microfinance ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND OF THE GRAND VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE ST FRANCIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PRODIGY VENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds WORK OPTIONS FOR WOMEN DBA WORK OPTIONS ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mile High Workshop Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bridge House ↗
  • Who funds SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON RECORD ↗
  • Who funds WORKLIFE PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO CHILDREN'S CHORALE ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE EXCHANGE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH UNITED RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTIVATE WORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds BAYAUD ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY WEALTH BUILDING ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds Partners in Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Savings Collaborative ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…The Denver FoundationRose Community Founda…The Colorado Health F…Gates Family Foundati…Anschutz Family Found…Daniels FundThe Anschutz Foundati…El Pomar FoundationBoettcher FoundationMile High United Way …Schlessman Foundation…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO128.7× affinity132 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Daniels Fund · The Anschutz Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Boettcher Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Schlessman Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenneth Kendal King Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenneth Kendal King Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    102report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kenneth Kendal King Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kenneth Kendal King Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 281 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenneth Kendal King’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home