· Private foundation
Kelly Family Cuidiu Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k58 grants · $268k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $175k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Aging Collaborative Inc | $100,000 |
| Dave's House | $30,000 |
| Siena College | $30,000 |
| The University at Albany Foundation | $30,000 |
| Second Harvest Food Pantry of Central Florida | $20,000 |
| Boys and Girls Club of Central Florida | $20,000 |
| Embrace of Celebration | $15,000 |
| TJ and Friends Foundation | $10,000 |
| American Red Cross Eastern NY Region | $10,000 |
| STEER For Student Athletes | $10,000 |
| Chess and Community | $7,500 |
| Womens Executive Council of Orlando | $6,000 |
| This is Me Foundation | $5,100 |
| Techbridge Girls | $5,000 |
| St John of God Community Services | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $333k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SUSIENA UNIVERSITY6× · 2018–2025 · $176k · revenue +16%
- DHDAVE'S HOUSE INC7× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +311%
- SFSTEER FOR STUDENT ATHLETES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +299%
Funded once
- FMFundacion Mochileando 100X35one grant, 2020 · $20k
- OCOsceola County Boys & Cirls Clubsone grant, 2023 · $20k
- UOUniversity Of Albany Foundation - School of Publicone grant, 2021 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
To provide rehabilitative housing services and support to help people with psychiatric disabilities reintegrate into the community.the agency provides rehabilitative housing services and staff support as a primary mechanism for achieving…
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.
To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.
Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…
Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hop On Home Rabbit Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
143 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 143 of the 274 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SIENA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds DAVE'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds STEER FOR STUDENT ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds EMBRACE OF CELEBRATION INC ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds DR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF FONTAINE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds MADISON OGLETHORPE ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
- Who funds ATHENS COMMUNITY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR CARE INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SAFE INC ↗
- Who funds HELP NOW OF OSCEOLA INC ↗
- Who funds CELEBRATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Techbridge Girls ↗
- Who funds THE CRUCIBLE ↗
- Who funds HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS XAVIER HAITIAN ORPHANAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUTTVILLE ↗
- Who funds AVIAN CONSERVATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Mission Neighborhood Centers Inc ↗
- Who funds LA COCINA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Greater Capital Region · Review Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Bbl Charitable Foundation · Capital District Physicians' Health Plan Inc · Neil Jane William Estelle Golub Family Foundation Inc · William Gundry Broughton Charitable Private Foundation Inc · Sunmark Charitable Community Foundation · Capital Communications Cares Foundation · Rose & Kiernan Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kelly Family Cuidiu Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Help Now of Osceola Inc — 48% of income from government
- Harbor House of Central Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Hope Community Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Dr Phillips Center for the Performing Arts Inc — 0% of income from government
- TrustBridge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kelly Family Cuidiu Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Kelly Family Cuidiu Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.