Loading…
Loading…
Colorado · Nonprofit
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WOLF PROJECT (Colorado) is funded by 6 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $192,748 in grants to it, the largest being THE BIOPHILIA FOUNDATION INC ($100,248). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WOLF PROJECT runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 6,276 animals nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,276 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Grant income rose $75k → $105k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of ROCKY MOUNTAIN WOLF PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WOLF PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 67% · 2020 80% · 2024 95% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WOLF PROJECT draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Colorado — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 5 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing