Skip to content
Kasal Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kasal Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$14kEducation$9kArts & Culture$7kInternational$5kHuman Services$2kPublic Benefit$2kFood & Nutrition$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$300Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$125
Median grant
7
States reached
$124k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HINDU TEMPLE OF GREATER FORT WORTH$1,251
HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION$1,001
CASE WESTERN UNIVERSITY$1,000
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$300
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$250
THE SALVATION ARMY$150
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$125
MERCY SHIPS$100
JUDICAL WATCH$100
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FT WORTH$100
SPCA OF TEXAS$100
MEALS ON WHEELS$100
TURNING POINT USA$100
TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $660) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%KASH FOUNDATION: $350 → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS: $100 → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $100 → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $60 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
SD
IA
OH
PA
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$38k · 25 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
12

Total granted

$38k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+21%

Still filing today

72%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationPublic BenefitAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +190%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +98%
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • M
    MMCGANA
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • CF
    CASE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • KF
    KASH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $350 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
6
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
7
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
8
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
9
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
12
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
22/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HINDU TEMPLE OF GREATER FORT WORTH: $13,106 · OtherHINDU TEMPLE OF GREATER FORT WORTHCASE WESTERN UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · OtherCASE WESTERN UNIVERSITYTHE SALVATION ARMY: $1,378 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYMMCGANA: $1,250 · OtherCASE FUND: $1,000 · Other+20 more: $3,923 · Other+20 moreHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $5,909 · Arts & CultureHINDU AMERICAN …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,525 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $825 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE F…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $450 · InternationalAMNESTY INTER…Mercy Ships International: $350 · InternationalMercy Ships I…CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,250 · EducationCASE WESTER…CASE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · EducationCASE ALUMNI…+1 more: $50 · EducationJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $700 · Public BenefitTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $350 · Public BenefitKASH FOUNDATION INC: $350 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS: $260 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $110 · Human ServicesTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $300 · Housing & Shelter
Other$24,657Arts & Culture$5,909International$5,150Education$4,300Public Benefit$1,050Human Services$920Housing & Shelter$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $5,909 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,525 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $825 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $525 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC: $400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKASH FOUNDATION INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $260 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY: $251 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ONESTAR FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $110 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOC OF ROYALTY OWNERS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConservative Partnership Institute: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationAmerican Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …The Pfizer Foundation…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…
Verizon FoundationNJ13× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kasal Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kasal Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kasal Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home