Skip to content

· Private foundation

Karl & Georgia Martin Sranna Belle Flynn Karl & June Martin Jr Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$633k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.0MHealth$814kHousing & Shelter$290kFood & Nutrition$285kHuman Services$103kYouth Development$100kScience & Tech$100kEnvironment$94kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $425k
$42,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANCIS TUTTLE FOUNDATION$105,000
SPECIAL CARE INC$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA$60,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA$60,000
MID-CONTINENT GEOLOGICAL LIBRARY$50,000
METRO TECH FOUNDATION$50,000
OSU FOUNDATION$42,500
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$42,500
OSU FOUNDATION$37,500
FRANCIS TUTTLE FOUNDATION$25,000
METRO TECH FOUNDATION$25,000
FND OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY COLL$20,000
PIVOT INC$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $728k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR: $25k → 15%NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR: $15k → 15%SPECIAL CARE INC: $100k → 16%PIVOT INC: $15k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $100k → 16%PIVOT INC: $15k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $75k → 16%PIVOT INC: $15k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $63k → 16%PIVOT INC: $15k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $50k → 16%PIVOT INC: $10k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $50k → 16%PIVOT INC: $10k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $50k → 16%PIVOT INC: $10k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $50k → 16%PIVOT INC: $10k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 14 repeat orgs$599k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$4.3M
$549k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+30%

Still filing today

64%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +46%
  • SC
    SPECIAL CARE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $588k · revenue +243%
  • PT
    POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $290k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • IH
    INTEGRIS Health Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +31%
  • TM
    THE MERCY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • FT
    FRANCIS TUTTLE TECHNOLOGY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dean Mcgee Eye Institute

The dean mcgee eye institute is dedicated to serving all oklahomans and the global community through excellence and leadership in patient care, education and vision research.

Health
2
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
3
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
4
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
5
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
6
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
8
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
9
Oklahoma Educational Memorial Trust Fdn

Providing, maintaining and issuing scholarships to eligible nominees or applicants for admission to college or for contributions to regularly maintained scholarship funds of other federal tax exempt colleges and universities with an…

Education
10
The Oklahoma United Methodist Foundation

To create and administer permanent charitable endowments to strengthen Methodist ministries in Oklahoma.

—
11
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
12
Regional Food Bank Foundation

The primary mission of the organization is to provide support to and manage the investments of the regional food bank of oklahoma, inc.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Dragonfly Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Oklahoma State University Foundation: $1,095,000 · EducationOklahoma State University FoundationFRANCIS TUTTLE FOUNDATION INC: $285,000 · EducationFRANCIS TUTTLE FOUNDATION INCThe University of Tulsa: $230,500 · EducationThe University of TulsaOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY+2 more: $100,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $513,500 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMAUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $470,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMAMETRO TECH FOUNDATION: $125,000 · OtherMETRO TECH FOUNDATIONOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $122,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGETHE MERCY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherTHE MERCY FOUNDATION+9 more: $248,500 · Other+9 moreSPECIAL CARE INC: $587,500 · Human ServicesSPECIAL CARE INCPIVOT INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesPIVOT INCNEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBOR FOR NEI…POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $290,000 · Youth DevelopmentREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $202,500 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $2,000 · Food & NutritionINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $100,000 · HealthJAMES MADISON EDUCATION FUND INC: $48,000 · Arts & CultureCOFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER: $30,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$1,910,500Other$1,579,000Human Services$727,500Youth Development$290,000Food & Nutrition$214,500Health$100,000Arts & Culture$48,000Recreation & Sports$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $1,095,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $587,500 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $290,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetFRANCIS TUTTLE FOUNDATION INC: $285,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $230,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $202,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPIVOT INC: $100,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Dragonfly Home Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetJAMES MADISON EDUCATION FUND INC: $48,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetNEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC: $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEDMOND MOBILE MEALS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCIS TUTTLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MID-CONTINENT GEOLOGICAL LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Dragonfly Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds JAMES MADISON EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds COFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds EDMOND MOBILE MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Wegener Foundation Inc · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Servant Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Karl & Georgia Martin Sranna Belle Flynn Karl & June Martin Jr Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Karl & Georgia Martin Sranna Belle Flynn Karl & June Martin Jr Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Karl & Georgia Martin Sranna Belle Flynn Karl & June Martin Jr Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph