· Private foundation
Karl & Georgia Martin Sranna Belle Flynn Karl & June Martin Jr Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k7 grants · $208k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $425k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRANCIS TUTTLE FOUNDATION | $105,000 |
| SPECIAL CARE INC | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA | $60,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA | $60,000 |
| MID-CONTINENT GEOLOGICAL LIBRARY | $50,000 |
| METRO TECH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| OSU FOUNDATION | $42,500 |
| POSITIVE TOMORROWS | $42,500 |
| OSU FOUNDATION | $37,500 |
| FRANCIS TUTTLE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| METRO TECH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| FND OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY COLL | $20,000 |
| PIVOT INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $728k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OSOklahoma State University Foundation9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +46%
- SCSPECIAL CARE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $588k · revenue +243%
- PTPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $290k · revenue +95%
Funded once
- IHINTEGRIS Health Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +31%
- TMTHE MERCY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $100k
- FTFRANCIS TUTTLE TECHNOLOGY CENTERone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The dean mcgee eye institute is dedicated to serving all oklahomans and the global community through excellence and leadership in patient care, education and vision research.
The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.
True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.
The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.
United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.
To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.
Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.
The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.
Providing, maintaining and issuing scholarships to eligible nominees or applicants for admission to college or for contributions to regularly maintained scholarship funds of other federal tax exempt colleges and universities with an…
To create and administer permanent charitable endowments to strengthen Methodist ministries in Oklahoma.
To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.
The primary mission of the organization is to provide support to and manage the investments of the regional food bank of oklahoma, inc.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Dragonfly Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
- Who funds FRANCIS TUTTLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PIVOT INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MID-CONTINENT GEOLOGICAL LIBRARY INC ↗
- Who funds The Dragonfly Home Inc ↗
- Who funds JAMES MADISON EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC ↗
- Who funds COFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa ↗
- Who funds EDMOND MOBILE MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · The Merrick Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Wegener Foundation Inc · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Servant Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Karl & Georgia Martin Sranna Belle Flynn Karl & June Martin Jr Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
- Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
- Special Care Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.