Skip to content

· Public charity

Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

$226M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1,122
Grants FY2024still arriving
28
States reached
$111M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$592MPhilanthropy$433MEducation$375MHuman Services$52MEmployment$46MHousing & Shelter$45MFood & Nutrition$37MScience & Tech$32MOther$0
02FY2024 · 1122 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k43 grants · $343k
  • $10k–50k700 grants · $16M
  • $50k–250k324 grants · $33M
  • $250k+55 grants · $176M
$25,000
Median grant
28
States reached
$87.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson School of Medici$110,953,269
St Josephs Foundation Of San Joaquin$24,033,359
National Council For Mental Wellbeing$5,380,000
Pajaro Valley Healthcare District$3,100,000
Golden State Warriors Commumity Foundation$2,916,050
La Clinica De La Raza Inc$2,628,400
Iehp Foundation$2,500,000
Regents Of The University Of Cal$2,233,668
Health Research Inc$1,243,926
Aliados Health$770,000
Regents Of The University Of California$732,902
Alliance For A Healthier Generation Inc$696,000
San Francisco Community Clinic Consortiu$675,000
Community Health Partnership Inc$675,000
Central Valley Health Network Inc$675,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $35.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $350k → 10%Nat'l Health Care For The Homeless Council: $678k → 14%Studio Ludo: $325k → 22%MARTIN LUTHER KING JR FREEDOM CENTER: $200k → 10%Nat'l Health Care For The Homeless Council: $250k → 14%ENCOMPASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $188k → 14%Lower Columbia Community Action Council: $250k → 13%Nat'l Health Care For The Homeless Council: $213k → 14%Info Line Of San Diego County: $491k → 11%North Bay Children's Center: $178k → 8%JAPANESE COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL: $500k → 10%Catholic Charities Of The Diocese Of: $275k → 12%La Familia Counseling Center Inc: $195k → 12%The Gathering Inn: $210k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $450k → 12%American National Red Cross: $269k → 10%Catholic Charities Diocese Of Stockton: $195k → 12%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $198k → 14%Sow A Seed Community Foundation: $190k → 12%Illumination Foundation: $211k → 10%Fresno Metropolitan Ministry: $1.1M → 19%Fresno Metropolitan Ministry: $200k → 19%Fresno Metropolitan Ministry: $185k → 19%Sacred Heart Community Service: $220k → 8%Special Service For Groups: $185k → 14%Tides Center: $253k → 19%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC: $190k → 19%Latino Community Foundation: $500k → 10%Latino Community Foundation: $358k → 10%Housing California: $274k → 12%Encompass Community Services: $200k → 13%Encompass Community Services: $188k → 13%TIdes Center: $593k → 10%Tides Center: $242k → 10%Information And Referral Federation of LA County: $450k → 14%Sacramento Steps Forward: $590k → 12%MISSION NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INC: $1.0M → 10%United States Veterans Initiative: $177k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $560k → 10%SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL NATIONAL: $400k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $300k → 10%Children Now: $250k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $225k → 10%ALAMEDA COUNTY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC: $190k → 10%American National Red Cross: $557k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $791k → 10%K to College: $1.5M → 10%Training Institute For Leadership: $260k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Kaiser Foundation Hospitals’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Kaiser Foundation Hospitalslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1B · 1690 repeat orgs$180M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

1690 repeat relationships: 914 still active in FY2024, 776 since wound down; 66 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1690
208

Total granted

$1.1B
$59M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+21%

Still filing today

85%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KP
    KAISER PERMANENTE BERNARD J TYSON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $460M · revenue +164% · 100% of their budget
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUIN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $86M · revenue +140% · 92% of their budget
  • SH
    SALEM HEALTH
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10M · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHIRLEY WARE EDUCATION CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $33M · revenue ×48
  • HS
    HAYWARD SISTERS HOSPITAL DBA ST ROSE HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $3.0M · revenue -1%
  • KF
    KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.9M · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
2
California Competes

California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy is a nonpartisan policy and research organization focused on identifying solutions to the states most critical challenges at the intersection of higher education, equity, and the…

Education
3
Community Housing Sonoma County

Community Housing Sonoma County creates supportive housing communities for people living with disabling conditions, especially veterans.

Housing & Shelter
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
Children's Council of San Francisco

Since 1974, Children's Council has been at the heart of early care and education in San Francisco.

Human Services
6
Family Violence Law Center

Family Violence Law Center ("FVLC") helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention…

Crime & Legal
7
Community Health Center of

To provide our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care

Health
8
Mid-City Community Advocacy Network

Mid-city community advocacy network works to build a safe, productive, and healthy community for the residents of city heights and greater san diego through collaboration, advocacy, and organizing.

Community Improvement
9
Inner City Law Center

Fighting for justice and housing by providing legal representation for the homeless and working poor.

Crime & Legal
10
County Supervisors Association of Calif

To represent county government before the california legislature, administrative agencies and support county government.

—
11
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
12
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Area Health Associates; the most unlike its peers is The Tech Interactive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

1732 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1732 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

83
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
582
Early backer (in before they grew)
1678/1732
Grantees still filing
1375/1732
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KAISER PERMANENTE BERNARD J TYSON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC: $460,463,171 · EducationKAISER PERMANENTE BERNARD J TYSON SCHO…+16 more: $24,129,705 · EducationEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $302,000,000 · PhilanthropyEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $97,525,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+7 more: $27,059,737 · Philanthropy+7 moreLatino Medical Association West INC: $110,953,269 · HealthLatino Medical Asso…SALEM HEALTH: $10,361,985 · Health+61 more: $122,629,253 · Health+61 moreST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUIN: $85,596,186 · OtherST JOSEPH'S FOUN…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $10,956,805 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $10,453,337 · Other+77 more: $100,751,325 · Other+77 moreTHE SHIRLEY WARE EDUCATION CENTER: $32,500,000 · Employment+3 more: $2,129,630 · EmploymentTIDES CENTER: $2,625,494 · Human ServicesFresno Metropolitan Ministry: $1,999,975 · Human ServicesK TO COLLEGE DBA SUPPLYBANKORG: $1,762,700 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,547,500 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,308,640 · Human ServicesNATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR HOMELESS COUNCIL: $1,240,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON: $1,205,000 · Human ServicesSafe Routes to School National: $1,100,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOW: $1,075,000 · Human ServicesMission Neighborhood Centers Inc: $1,025,000 · Human ServicesINFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $975,166 · Human ServicesSacramento Steps Forward: $965,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Link Capital Region: $900,000 · Human ServicesSierra Vista Child & Family Services: $893,506 · Human ServicesENCOMPASS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $846,968 · Human ServicesHUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $835,250 · Human Services+6 more: $4,035,840 · Human ServicesOakland Parks and Recreation Foundation: $3,596,083 · Recreation & SportsGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,916,050 · Recreation & SportsSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $2,105,000 · Recreation & SportsKABOOM INC: $1,005,000 · Recreation & SportsNIROGA INSTITUTE: $595,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$484,592,876Philanthropy$426,584,737Health$243,944,507Other$207,757,653Employment$34,629,630Human Services$24,341,039Recreation & Sports$10,217,133

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKAISER PERMANENTE BERNARD J TYSON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC: $460,463,171 over 6y, 100% of budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $302,000,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $97,525,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUIN: $85,596,186 over 8y, 92% of budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,924,500 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetSALEM HEALTH: $10,361,985 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION: $7,325,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC: $6,507,309 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOCHIN INC: $6,012,651 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $5,530,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,526,990 over 5y, 28% of budgetOAKLAND PROMISE: $5,024,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $5,010,000 over 1y, 75% of budgetProject Access Now: $4,846,755 over 8y, 13% of budgetLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC: $4,806,188 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC: $4,430,770 over 8y, 13% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $4,213,356 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER AT OAKLAND: $3,594,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetALIADOS HEALTH: $3,280,500 over 7y, 12% of budgetHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE: $3,209,285 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetFRED FINCH YOUTH CENTER: $3,039,107 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetHAYWARD SISTERS HOSPITAL DBA ST ROSE HOSPITAL: $3,000,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCentral City Concern: $2,935,317 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,916,050 over 1y, 36% of budgetCommunity Health Partnership Inc: $2,805,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetSan Francisco Community Clinic Consortium: $2,655,000 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE SAFETY-NET INSTITUTE: $2,631,805 over 8y, 23% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $2,625,494 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $2,544,750 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetIEHP Foundation: $2,500,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetWELLSPACE HEALTH: $2,375,743 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetHealthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Community HealthWorks: $2,244,000 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetSPANISH SPEAKING UNITY COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY INC: $2,241,879 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetCENTRAL VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $2,230,000 over 6y, 47% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $2,207,314 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2,192,286 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $2,105,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetUT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS: $2,081,148 over 4y, 36% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $2,045,083 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFresno Metropolitan Ministry: $1,999,975 over 8y, 12% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $1,962,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCommunity Clinic Consortium: $1,927,000 over 5y, 92% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1,923,774 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON: $1,923,461 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHPARTNERS INC: $1,920,801 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,862,684 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER NETWORK INC: $1,800,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetK TO COLLEGE DBA SUPPLYBANKORG: $1,762,700 over 5y, 90% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KAISER PERMANENTE BERNARD J TYSON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Latino Medical Association West INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUIN ↗
  • Who funds THE SHIRLEY WARE EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SALEM HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds EAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds OCHIN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Project Access Now ↗
  • Who funds LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC ↗
  • Who funds Pajaro Valley Healthcare District Project ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds Oakland Parks and Recreation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER AT OAKLAND ↗
  • Who funds ALIADOS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FRED FINCH YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HAYWARD SISTERS HOSPITAL DBA ST ROSE HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Central City Concern ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Health Partnership Inc ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium ↗
  • Who funds THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE SAFETY-NET INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sunlight GivingCA137.9× affinity165 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sunlight Giving · Sutter Bay Hospitals · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Scan Health Plan · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · United Way of the Bay Area · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Sutter Valley Hospitals · The California Wellness Foundation · Essential Access Health · The California Endowment · California Primary Care Association

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kaiser Foundation Hospitals funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kaiser Foundation Hospitals. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Sheltercare: 18% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Ochin Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Project Access Now: 2% of income from government
  • Salem Health: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
66report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kaiser Foundation Hospitals’ filings →

More from the funding graph