Skip to content
Jurschak Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Jurschak Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$248kCommunity Improvement$205kHuman Services$137kHealth$80kScience & Tech$73kEducation$65kReligion$47kHousing & Shelter$37kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $187k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VAIL HEALTH FOUNDATION$45,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$40,960
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$25,000
WALKING MT SCIENCE MISSION$20,000
VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION$16,000
THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION$15,000
BRAVO VAIL$15,000
EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST$10,000
FACTS ABOUT FERTILITY$5,000
ST CLARE OF ASSISI PARISH$5,000
HOLY SPIRIT PARISH$5,000
BETTY FORD ALPINE GARDEN$2,500
THE BASILICA OF SAINT MARY$2,000
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%VETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES: $1k → 8%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE: $2k → 7%EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
HI
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$703k · 22 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against -29% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$703k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-29%

Still filing today

55%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VP
    VILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $128k · revenue ×200 · 76% of their budget
  • VV
    VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $101k · revenue +61%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $37k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST ANTHONY OF PADUA CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF ARLINGTON VA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • TC
    TUESDAY'S CHILDREN
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vail International Pro Am
Recreation & Sports
2
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
3
Vvmc Diversified Services

Elevating health across our mountain communities.

Health
4
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
5
Bravo Colorado At Beaver Creek-Vail Inc Dba Bravo Vail Valley Music Festival

Enriching people's lives through the power of music.*producing the finest performances by the greatest artists*fostering music education, and*promoting a life-long appreciation for the arts

Arts & Culture
6
Valley View Hospital Association

Caring for you and your family, one patient at a time.

Health
7
Fountain Valley School of Colorado

Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…

Education
8
Eagle Valley Mental Health

Eagle valley mental health (dba eagle valley behavioral health) primarily serves the behavioral health care needs of eagle county, and secondarily the region surrounding eagle county.

Health
9
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
10
Vail Place

To help people with serious mental illnesses avoid crisis, achieve stability, and pursue active lives based on their abilities.

Health
11
Vermont Land Trust Inc

Rooted in vermont since 1977, the vermont land trust unites land and lives for the enduring benefit of people and the place we share. we help people protect, care for, and connect to land. this includes the farms, forests, natural areas,…

Environment
12
Vail Clinic Inc % Vhh Accounting Department

Elevating health across our mountain communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Veterans Advocacy Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRAVO VAIL: $90,000 · OtherBRAVO VAILWALKING MT SCIENCE MISSION: $72,750 · OtherWALKING MT SCIENCE MISSIONUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA: $49,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWAIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherBASILICA OF SAINT MARY: $12,000 · Other+17 more: $74,900 · Other+17 moreVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $204,830 · Community ImprovementVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATIONVILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $127,500 · Arts & CultureVILAR PERFORMING A…Caramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCaramoor Center fo…VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $101,370 · Human ServicesVAIL VETERANS FO…THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHIRD OPTION FOU…+2 more: $4,200 · Human ServicesVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $70,000 · HealthVAIL HEAL…FACTS ABOUT FERTILITY INC: $5,000 · HealthFACTS ABO…+1 more: $500 · HealthHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $37,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,500 · InternationalBetty Ford Alpine Gardens: $16,500 · EnvironmentEAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $10,000 · Environment
Other$312,150Community Improvement$204,830Arts & Culture$157,500Human Services$135,570Health$75,500International$38,500Environment$26,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $204,830 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetVILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $127,500 over 4y, 76% of budgetVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $101,370 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $37,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCaramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBetty Ford Alpine Gardens: $16,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE STEAMBOAT INSTITUTE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $7,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HARVEY SCHOOL: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFACTS ABOUT FERTILITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUESDAY'S CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetJACK'S PLACE FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKATONAH-BEDFORD HILLS VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Caramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds Betty Ford Alpine Gardens ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE STEAMBOAT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds THE HARVEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FACTS ABOUT FERTILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND ↗
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds TUESDAY'S CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JACK'S PLACE FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KATONAH-BEDFORD HILLS VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitabl…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN10.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jurschak Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jurschak Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jurschak Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home