· Private foundation
Jurschak Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $187k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VAIL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $45,000 |
| VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION | $40,960 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL | $25,000 |
| WALKING MT SCIENCE MISSION | $20,000 |
| VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION | $16,000 |
| BRAVO VAIL | $15,000 |
| THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST | $10,000 |
| HOLY SPIRIT PARISH | $5,000 |
| FACTS ABOUT FERTILITY | $5,000 |
| ST CLARE OF ASSISI PARISH | $5,000 |
| BETTY FORD ALPINE GARDEN | $2,500 |
| THE BASILICA OF SAINT MARY | $2,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE IDF | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against -29% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VPVILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC4× · 2018–2021 · $128k · revenue ×200 · 76% of their budget
- VVVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $101k · revenue +35%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC2× · 2023–2024 · $37k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- SAST ANTHONY OF PADUA CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $10k
- AOARCHDIOCESE OF ARLINGTON VAone grant, 2021 · $5k
- TCTUESDAY'S CHILDRENone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.
Elevating health across our mountain communities.
The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.
Enriching people's lives through the power of music.*producing the finest performances by the greatest artists*fostering music education, and*promoting a life-long appreciation for the arts
Caring for you and your family, one patient at a time.
Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…
Eagle valley mental health (dba eagle valley behavioral health) primarily serves the behavioral health care needs of eagle county, and secondarily the region surrounding eagle county.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
To help people with serious mental illnesses avoid crisis, achieve stability, and pursue active lives based on their abilities.
Rooted in vermont since 1977, the vermont land trust unites land and lives for the enduring benefit of people and the place we share. we help people protect, care for, and connect to land. this includes the farms, forests, natural areas,…
Elevating health across our mountain communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Veterans Advocacy Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VILAR PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Caramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds Betty Ford Alpine Gardens ↗
- Who funds EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE STEAMBOAT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
- Who funds THE HARVEY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FACTS ABOUT FERTILITY INC ↗
- Who funds EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND ↗
- Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds TUESDAY'S CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds VETERANS ADVOCACY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds JACK'S PLACE FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KATONAH-BEDFORD HILLS VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jurschak Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.