Skip to content

· Public charity

Journey for Good Foundation Inc

Founded in 2015 and headquartered in bethesda, maryland, journey for good foundation is a 501(c)(3) charitable oragnization intently focused on fighting poverty in the local community with food, shelter, education, and workforce development opportunities.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
103
Grants FY2025still arriving
33
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.8MEmployment$1.7MHuman Services$1.1MHousing & Shelter$800kEducation$553kYouth Development$328kPublic Safety & Disaster$197kReligion$125kOther$0
02FY2025 · 103 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 103 grants below total $2,597,347, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,719,207 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $121,860 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k98 grants · $2.3M
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
33
States reached
$931k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$100,000
BLACK GIRLS COOK$50,000
GRACE-MAR SERVICES INC$50,000
THE LAMB CENTER$50,000
EMMA'S TORCH LTD$50,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$36,174
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$36,173
TOGETHER WE BAKE$30,000
SD GUNNER FUND$30,000
ORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC$30,000
THE HOPE PROGRAM$30,000
ATLANTA MISSION$30,000
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$30,000
HIT THE BOOKS$30,000
KIDS' MEALS INC$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EMMA'S TORCH LTD: $30k → 17%KID NET FOUNDATION DBA JONATHAN'S PLACE: $25k → 14%TAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YMCA: $30k → 13%HEAVEN SOUTH DBA THE STORE: $50k → 14%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $25k → 8%SD GUNNER FUND: $30k → 8%ATLANTA MISSION: $30k → 13%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $30k → 9%SO ALL MAY EAT INC: $25k → 12%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $20k → 9%TOGETHER WE BAKE: $30k → 9%EMMA'S TORCH LTD: $30k → 20%KID NET FOUNDATION DBA JONATHAN'S PLACE: $25k → 14%HOODIES 4 HEALING INC: $25k → 16%GRACE-MAR SERVICES INC: $50k → 10%SD GUNNER FUND: $25k → 8%ATLANTA MISSION: $30k → 13%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 9%SO ALL MAY EAT INC: $20k → 12%TOGETHER WE BAKE: $25k → 9%GARCES FOUNDATION: $20k → 22%EMMA'S TORCH LTD: $30k → 20%KIDS' MEALS INC: $30k → 16%HEAVEN SOUTH DBA THE STORE: $20k → 14%GRACE-MAR SERVICES INC: $50k → 10%SD GUNNER FUND: $20k → 8%SO ALL MAY EAT INC: $20k → 12%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $25k → 15%PEACE4KIDS: $20k → 14%EMMA'S TORCH: $30k → 20%PARTNERS FOR HARRIS COUNTY CHILDREN DBA BEAR BE A RESOURCE FOR CPS KIDS: $25k → 16%HEAVEN SOUTH INC DBA THE STORE: $20k → 14%GRACE-MAR SERVICES: $50k → 10%SD GUNNER FUND: $20k → 8%PEACE4KIDS: $20k → 14%EMMA'S TORCH: $30k → 20%UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE (US VETS HOUSTON): $20k → 16%GRACE MAR SERVICES: $32k → 10%YOUTHCARE: $25k → 9%PEACE4KIDS: $20k → 14%EMMA'S TORCH: $20k → 20%THE STORE: $20k → 14%GRACE-MAR SERVICES INC: $25k → 10%EMMA'S TORCH LTD: $50k → 14%EMMA'S TORCH LTD: $50k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $45k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $30k → 14%RAGS OF HONOR 1: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Journey for Good Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Journey for Good Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 82 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

82 repeat relationships: 63 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
36

Total granted

$5.4M
$460k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+53%

Still filing today

98%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $830k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    The National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation
    3× · 2019–2025 · $300k · revenue +25%
  • ET
    EMMA'S TORCH LTD
    8× · 2018–2025 · $270k · revenue +267%
  • TL
    THE LAMB CENTER
    7× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +232%

Funded once

  • TM
    TAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +46%
  • SO
    SISTERS OF WATTS
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -15%
  • HF
    HOSEA FEED THE HUNGRY AND HOMELESS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
3
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
4
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement
5
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
6
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
7
Philabundance

PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…

Food & Nutrition
8
Community Kitchen Pittsburgh

Community kitchen pittsburgh is a nonprofit food service company. because poverty, food insecurity and employment are entwined issues, we work across these focus areas, engaging in the following activities: "culinary based workforce…

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
11
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
12
Good Food Works Inc
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Black Girls Cook. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

155 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 155 of the 160 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
38
Early backer (in before they grew)
152/155
Grantees still filing
84/155
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EMMA'S TORCH LTD: $270,000 · Human ServicesEMMA'S TORCH LTDGRACE-MAR SERVICES INC: $226,500 · Human ServicesGRACE-MAR SERVICES INCTogether We Bake: $125,000 · Human ServicesTogether We BakePEACE 4 KIDS: $120,000 · Human ServicesPEACE 4 KIDSTHE STORE INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesTHE STORE INCThe SD Gunner Fund Inc: $95,000 · Human ServicesSHOES THAT FIT: $85,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesSO ALL MAY EAT INC: $65,000 · Human Services+28 more: $717,500 · Human Services+28 moreThe National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation: $300,000 · Food & NutritionThe National Restaura…BLACK GIRLS COOK: $115,000 · Food & NutritionBLACK GIRLS COOKMOVE FOR HUNGER INC: $100,000 · Food & NutritionMOVE FOR HUNGER INC412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $70,000 · Food & Nutrition412 FOOD RESCUE INCFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC: $55,000 · Food & NutritionGOTHAM FOOD PANTRY INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionKID PACK INC: $45,000 · Food & Nutrition+21 more: $441,000 · Food & Nutrition+21 moreSTRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC: $107,500 · OtherSTRONG CITY BALTIMORE INCNational Restaurant Association: $100,000 · OtherLOAVES AND FISHES TOO: $70,000 · OtherTHE LAMB CENTER: $180,000 · OtherTHE LAMB CENTERWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $121,174 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC+47 more: $1,388,673 · Other+47 moreA WIDER CIRCLE INC: $105,100 · EducationNEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY INC: $77,000 · EducationEDWINS LEADERSHIP & RESTAURANT INSTITUTE: $65,000 · EducationYouth Guidance: $60,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationCommunities In Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc: $35,000 · EducationGRADUATE PHILADELPHIA: $20,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF TENNESSEE: $20,000 · Education+3 more: $32,500 · EducationORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterOAK CITY CARES INC: $55,000 · Housing & ShelterEDWARD KLINE MEM HOMELESS VETERANS FUND INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterBeans Cafe Inc: $47,500 · Housing & ShelterNEW ORLEANS WOMEN & CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterUSA CARES INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterNAZARETH HOUSING INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAS VEGAS: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterMEMPHIS UNION MISSON: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter+3 more: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterSKILLS FOR CHICAGO: $85,000 · EmploymentCommunity Culinary School of Charlotte Inc: $80,000 · EmploymentTHE HOPE PROGRAM INC: $60,000 · EmploymentCODE PLATOON NFP: $55,000 · EmploymentDOG TAG INC: $45,000 · EmploymentJUMA VENTURES INC: $30,000 · EmploymentNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK: $25,000 · EmploymentWorking Wardrobes For A New Start: $25,000 · EmploymentHORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $145,000 · Youth DevelopmentHit the Books Inc: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentSISTERS OF WATTS: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentSON OF A SAINT: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBROOKLYN BOOK BODEGA INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC: $20,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $15,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$1,889,000Food & Nutrition$1,286,000Other$1,967,347Education$469,600Housing & Shelter$452,500Employment$405,000Youth Development$345,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation: $300,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetEMMA'S TORCH LTD: $270,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetGRACE-MAR SERVICES INC: $226,500 over 6y, 11% of budgetTHE LAMB CENTER: $180,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetHORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $145,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetTogether We Bake: $125,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $121,174 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPEACE 4 KIDS: $120,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetBLACK GIRLS COOK: $115,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetTHE STORE INC: $110,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetSTRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC: $107,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA WIDER CIRCLE INC: $105,100 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMOVE FOR HUNGER INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNational Restaurant Association: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe SD Gunner Fund Inc: $95,000 over 4y, 46% of budgetSKILLS FOR CHICAGO: $85,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT: $85,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Culinary School of Charlotte Inc: $80,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetNEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR ARTS & TECHNOLOGY INC: $77,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES TOO: $70,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEDWINS LEADERSHIP & RESTAURANT INSTITUTE: $65,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSO ALL MAY EAT INC: $65,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetHEALTHY NEW ALBANY INC: $62,500 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Guidance: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMBHI: $60,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetTHE HOPE PROGRAM INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBE A LEADER FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetYOUR HARVEST HOUSE: $55,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetILLINOIS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetINTERFAITH WORKS: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCODE PLATOON NFP: $55,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOAK CITY CARES INC: $55,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHIGHLINE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $55,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetEDWARD KLINE MEM HOMELESS VETERANS FUND INC: $50,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetKID NET FOUNDATION JONATHANS PLACE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGOTHAM FOOD PANTRY INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA RESTAURANT FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHit the Books Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nora Roberts FoundationMD21.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nora Roberts Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Pwc Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Simple Generosity Foundation · Mgm Resorts Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Journey for Good Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Journey for Good Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Faith-Hope-Love-Charity Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Building African American Minds Inc: 12% of income from government
  • A Wider Circle Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Christian Sharing Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Tampa Metropolitan Area Young Men's Christian Association Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Interfaith Works: 4% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
64report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Journey for Good Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Journey for Good Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 160 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Journey for Good’s filings →

More from the funding graph