· Private foundation
John K and Luise V Hanson Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 83% of JOHN K AND LUISE V HANSON FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k65 grants · $285k
- $10k–50k51 grants · $897k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $889k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WALDORF LUTHERAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $1,025,000 |
| FOREST CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| VESTERHEIM NORWEGIAN-AMERICAN MUSEUM | $200,000 |
| WALDORF LUTHERAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $130,000 |
| UNITED STATES SAILING CENTER OF MARTIN COUNTY INC | $100,000 |
| CITY OF FOREST CITY | $59,000 |
| CLEAR LAKE COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| TEMPLE GRANDIN SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| HANCOCK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $50,000 |
| CLEAR LAKE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| FOREST CITY FAMILY YMCA | $45,000 |
| T L C BROADCASTING CORPORATION | $37,500 |
| CITY OF FOREST CITY | $32,000 |
| LAKE MILLS FAMILY CENTER | $30,000 |
| BLUE STARS PERFORMING ARTS FOR YOUTH INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
67 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 67 since wound down; 100 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WLWaldorf Lutheran College Foundation3× · 2021–2024 · $2.3M
- MCMayo Clinic Department of Development3× · 2021–2024 · $1.5M
- FCForest City Education Foundation3× · 2021–2024 · $570k
Funded once
- NINorth Iowa Area Community College Fou...one grant, 2021 · $750k
- COCity of Forest City - Bear Creek Golf Co...one grant, 2024 · $210k
- CLClear Lake Development Foundationone grant, 2024 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advance tourism, assist in new and existing business development and promote economic, professional, cultural and civic interests in the iowa great lakes area.
The community foundation for western iowa is dedicated to creating a lasting legacy in our region by engaging our citizens and communities for durable change and fostering a culture of philanthropy. this is where giving grows.
Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…
Provision of christ centered education with scholastic excellence.
In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.
To assist with civic projects within the City of Lake View, IA
The commission is organized for the purpose of fostering national or international sports competition in the greater iowa city, iowa metropolitan area; to support & develop amateur for national & international sports competition.
To promote business development and tourism in winona minnesota and the surrounding area
To promote local businesses and business development in fairfield, iowa
Enhance the economy of mason city and promote the north iowa area as a destination for overnight visitors.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of Greater Iowa and the most unlike its peers is Belmond Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 38. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 274 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WALDORF LUTHERAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VESTERHEIM NORWEGIAN-AMERICAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds FOREST CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES SAILING CENTER OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FOREST CITY FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds HANCOCK CTY ECONOMIC DEV CORP ↗
- Who funds TEMPLE GRANDIN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Clear Lake Comm School Foundation ↗
- Who funds CLEAR LAKE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds T L C BROADCASTING CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Citizens Bank Charitable Foundation · Farrer Endowment Foundation · Bertha Stebens Charitable Foundation · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Beth E Reinhart Charitable Trust · The David & Phyllis Murphy Charitable Foundation · Kinney-Lindstrom Foundation Inc · Tomson Family Foundation Trust · Dorothy Ann Weitzel and Thomas F W · Winnebago Industries Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · New Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John K and Luise V Hanson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to John K and Luise V Hanson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to John K and Luise V Hanson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.