Loading…
Loading…
Iowa · Nonprofit
BUILD A BETTER BELMOND (Iowa) is funded by 7 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $2,355,822 in grants to it, the largest being Richard O Jacobson Foundation ($1,000,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
BUILD A BETTER BELMOND is funded by 7 grantmakers reporting $2.4M in grants to it.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,862 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2022
$5k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $72k and 2 in 2019.
1 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 29% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of BUILD A BETTER BELMOND’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
BUILD A BETTER BELMOND leans on a few funders — its largest provides 42% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 93% · 2020 91% · 2021 38% · 2022 70% · 2023 82% · 2024 46% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
BUILD A BETTER BELMOND is locally rooted: 99% of its grant income comes from Iowa funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $84k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100% of spending goes to programs.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2022–2022), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing