How much did DOROTHY ANN WEITZEL AND THOMAS F W grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of DOROTHY ANN WEITZEL AND THOMAS F W’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2022

church

2023

biblechristian

2024

campershipsvanpurchasechurch

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k12 grants · $49k
$10k–50k9 grants · $191k
$50k–250k3 grants · $160k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$9.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

GOSERV GLOBAL$60,000
GREATER IA YOUTH FOR CHRIST$50,000
CLEAR LAKE CLASSICAL$50,000
BETHEL UNIVERITY FOUNDATION$33,500
ONE VISION$30,000
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$26,000
NORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$25,000
ONE COLLECTIVE$25,000
NORTH IOWA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$20,000
ELDERBRIDGE AGENCY ON AGING$11,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
MASON CITY CHRISTMAS CHEER FUND$10,000
GRACE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH$7,500
HIDDEN ACRES CHRISTIAN CENTER$7,000
SHARE LIFE$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of DOROTHY ANN WEITZEL AND THOMAS F W’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 76% of the giving stays in IA; read by stated purpose it is 66% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

DOROTHY ANN WEITZEL AND THOMAS F Wlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$561k · 14 repeat orgs$319k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$561k

$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%

+6%

Still filing today

64%

13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $226k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementInternationalYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CL
CLEAR LAKE CLASSICAL
3× · 2022–2024 · $170k · revenue +872%
NI
NORTH IOWA AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +83%
NI
NORTH IOWA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +17%

Funded once

FI
FREEDOM INN HIS GRACE
one grant, 2023 · $28k
HB
HARVEST BIBLE CHAPEL NORTH IOWA
one grant, 2023 · $25k
WB
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS
one grant, 2023 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Iowa Association of Christian Schools

To serve non-public Christian schools in the State of Iowa.

Education

United Way of North Central Iowa

Connect and strengthen community resources to inspire change in the lives of all north Iowans.

Philanthropy

Northwest Christian School

To provide a bible-based program of education that enables students to develop a (cont'd on sch. o) christian world view.

—

Iowa Mennonite School

To offer high school students an academically excellent, christ-centered education. within a caring community, hillcrest academy prepares students for lives of christian discipleship, peacemaking and service.

Education

North County Christian School Inc

The mission of north county christian school is to glorify god while providing a biblically based, christ-centered education dedicated to academic excellence in a nurturing community.

Education

Nebraska Christian Schools Inc

To assist the family & church by providing a christ-centered education, equipping students with a biblical worldview and encouraging a love relationship with the lord jesus christ.

Education

Christian Central Academy

Christian central academy is an independent, inter-denominational college preparatory christian school for students in kindergarten through grade twelve.

Education

Iowa Christian Academy

To provide christian and general education for grades k-12

—

Community Christian Schools

To serve families who desire for their children to have an education that is distinctly christian by providing a biblically integrated academic program provided by godly and committed faculty and staff.

Education

Wisconsin Independent Christian School

Pursue educational excellence through christ centered programs.

Education

Northlake Christian School

Northlake christian school is a private, non-denominational, non-profit christian school that exists to assist the christian community in providing a christ-centered environment in which faith can be integrated with learning to offer a…

—

Ingham-Okoboji Lutheran Bible Camp Assn

A camping and retreating ministry helping children, adults and families enter into a relationship with Jesus Christ and helping them maintain that relationship through our programming.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of Greater Iowa and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

06the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/17

Grantees still filing

14/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$445,552Education$245,000Housing & Shelter$70,792Public Safety & Disaster$60,000International$37,000Human Services$11,000Religion$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bertha Stebens Charitable FoundationDE29.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bertha Stebens Charitable Foundation · First Citizens Charitable Foundation Inc · Kinney-Lindstrom Foundation Inc · Jd Nelson and Debra Nelson Charitable Foundation · Farrer Endowment Foundation · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines · The David & Phyllis Murphy · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Lee Endowment Foundation · United Way of North Central Iowa · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation DOROTHY ANN WEITZEL AND THOMAS F W funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OAK HILLS ACADEMY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 833170669 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OAK HILLS ACADEMY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 34% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Dorothy Ann Weitzel and Thomas F W?

Find your warmest path to Dorothy Ann Weitzel and Thomas F W through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

DOROTHY ANN WEITZEL AND THOMAS F W

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dorothy Ann Weitzel and Thomas F W?

More from the funding graph

DOROTHY ANN WEITZEL AND THOMAS F W

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Dorothy Ann Weitzel and Thomas F W?

More from the funding graph