· Private foundation
John G & Jean R Gosnell Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $825k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $285k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY INC | $70,000 |
| NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| IDENTITY | $55,000 |
| NATIONAL PARK TRUST | $50,000 |
| CENTRONIA | $50,000 |
| SULTANA EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $45,000 |
| NATURE FORWARD FKA AUDUBON NATURALIST SOCIETY OF THE CENTRAL ATLANTIC STAT | $45,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL | $40,000 |
| ALICE FERGUSON FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| THE LITERACY LAB | $40,000 |
| HORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON | $40,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA | $40,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE | $40,000 |
| ASHLEY HALL FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| IDENTITY | $40,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $677k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.
48 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IIIDENTITY INC7× · 2019–2025 · $495k · revenue +255%
- NPNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2025 · $385k · revenue +117%
- CCCHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY INC8× · 2017–2025 · $353k · revenue +198%
Funded once
- CFCENTER FOR INSPIRED TEACHINGone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -75%
- LHLUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +23%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $30k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
How this is measured
85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IDENTITY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRONIA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE LITERACY LAB ↗
- Who funds Nature Forward ↗
- Who funds CITY BLOSSOMS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds ANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SULTANA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASHLEY HALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of Acadia ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds GENERATION HOPE ↗
- Who funds Alice Ferguson Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCARE DC ↗
- Who funds PARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds DC SCORES ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE DISCOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds RARE Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LEU GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WASHINGTON DC & NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds Peace of Mind Inc ↗
- Who funds REACH EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER DC DIAPER BANK ↗
- Who funds KIDS ON POINT INC ↗
- Who funds MERCK FOREST FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds APPLETREE INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION INNOVATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR INSPIRED TEACHING ↗
- Who funds LUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DEE NORTON LOWCOUNTRY CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds NONPROFIT MONTGOMERY INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Richard E & Nancy P Marriott Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Corina Higginson Trust Co Laura Ford Trustee · Hattie M Strong Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization John G & Jean R Gosnell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John G & Jean R Gosnell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- National Park Trust Inc: 51% of income from government
- Alice Ferguson Foundation Inc: 34% of income from government
- Nature Forward: 32% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
- Chesapeake Conservancy Inc: 27% of income from government
- Vermont Woodlands Association: 21% of income from government
- Anacostia Watershed Society Inc: 15% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
- Sultana Education Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
- Identity Inc: 7% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc: 6% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
- Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on John G & Jean R Gosnell’s filings →