Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Ingrid Harbaugh Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$295k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$616kHuman Services$258kReligion$235kHealth$218kInternational$169kAnimals$145kArts & Culture$115kEducation$108kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $165k
$4,454
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$100,000
THE HEARTBEAT OF THE CITY$65,000
Individual grant recipient$36,720
ATHLETES IN ACTION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH$7,441
GREATER GETHSEMMANE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH$7,087
DOUGLAS MEMORIAL COMMUNITY CHURCH$6,723
THE MIX CHURCH$6,182
GREATER BALTIMORE CHURCH$5,945
CHRISTIAN LIFE CHURCH$4,454
Individual grant recipient$4,163
TRANSFORMATION CHURCH OF JESUS$3,988
THE LORDS CHURCH$3,927
GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 14%CHESTERWYE CENTER INC: $2k → 7%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $15k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $25k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $25k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 19 repeat orgs$547k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
26

Total granted

$1.5M
$383k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+3%

Still filing today

42%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $164k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    6× · 2017–2023 · $303k · revenue +120%
  • HU
    HELPING UP MISSION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $80k · revenue +12%
  • AF
    Araminta Freedom Initiative
    2× · 2022–2023 · $65k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • UO
    University of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +3%
  • SH
    SARAHS HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Mercy Multiplied International Inc

Mercy multiplied international, inc. is a christian-based entity that exists as the central coordinating body for the mercy multiplied program and brand. formerly known as mercy ministries international, inc., the ministry officially…

—
3
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
4
Commonwealth Catholic Charities

To provide quality, compassionate human services to all people, especially the most vulnerable, regardless of faith, by empowering individuals, streghening families and building community through faith and service.

Human Services
5
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.

Health
6
American Military Family Inc

American military family (amf) provides veterans and their families with assistance, whether it be emotional, physical, mental, or finanical, for their missing, suicidal, displaced or struggling hero.

Public Benefit
7
Mission Clinical Services

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health
8
Christar International Inc

Christar international serves as a catalyst to the network of christar ministries by facilitating and encouraging partnerships with churches who sen dout men and women who proclaim the gospel for life-giving transformation in communitiesw…

Religion
9
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
10
Community Mercy Health Partners

The mission of community mercy health partners is to carry out the bon secours mercy health mission within our community by providing safe, effective, patient/resident centered, timely and cost efficient care and education to meet the…

Health
11
Mercy Medical Center

Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…

Health
12
University of Maryland St Joseph Medical Center Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to nurture the healing ministry of the church by bringing it new life, energy and visibility in the 21st century. fidelity to the gospel urges us to emphasize human dignity and social justice as we move toward…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Newday Usa Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ATHLETES IN ACTION: $260,000 · OtherATHLETES IN ACTIONIndividual grant recipient: $135,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHEDRAL OF MARY OUR QUEEN: $85,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL OF MARY OUR QUEENHELPING UP MISSION INC: $80,000 · OtherHELPING UP MISSION INCTHE HEARTBEAT OF THE CITY: $65,000 · OtherTHE HEARTBEAT OF THE CITYIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherST MARK PARISH: $50,000 · OtherMIAMI ATHLETIC FUND: $45,000 · Other+42 more: $433,237 · Other+42 moreFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $303,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CH…Araminta Freedom Initiative: $65,000 · Human ServicesAraminta F…ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATED…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WA…AMERICAS GOLD STAR FAMILIES: $25,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAS G…+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesCompassion International Incorporated: $163,648 · InternationalCompassio…+2 more: $5,360 · InternationalUniversity of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc: $40,000 · EducationGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $13,000 · EducationMILITARY CHILD EDUCATION COALITION: $5,000 · EducationNEWDAY USA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyBRIGANCE BRIGADE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyAFTER THE IMPACT FUND INC: $50,000 · Health
Other$1,203,237Youth Development$303,000Human Services$182,000International$169,008Education$58,000Philanthropy$55,000Health$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $303,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $163,648 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING UP MISSION INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAraminta Freedom Initiative: $65,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAFTER THE IMPACT FUND INC: $50,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAS GOLD STAR FAMILIES: $25,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetCHRIST'S COMMUNITY IN COLLEGE HILL: $20,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetNEWDAY USA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBRIGANCE BRIGADE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNFL FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOUGLAS MEMORIAL COMMUNITY CHURCH: $6,723 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCHRISTINA GRIMMIE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetMILITARY CHILD EDUCATION COALITION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTERWYE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELINK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Araminta Freedom Initiative ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AFTER THE IMPACT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SARAHS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAS GOLD STAR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST'S COMMUNITY IN COLLEGE HILL ↗
  • Who funds NEWDAY USA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGANCE BRIGADE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND CENTER FOR VETERANS EDUCATION AND TRAINING INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NFL FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353RI12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Ingrid Harbaugh Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Ingrid Harbaugh Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Araminta Freedom Initiative: 26% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Helping Up Mission Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Chesterwye Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John and Ingrid Harbaugh Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to John and Ingrid Harbaugh Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Ingrid Harbaugh Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph