· Private foundation
John and Golda Cohen Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k51 grants · $128k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $698k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $795k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MSI-US | $175,000 |
| Engender Health | $170,000 |
| IPAS | $170,000 |
| Dave's House | $100,000 |
| Planned Parenthood of Southwest and | $80,000 |
| PCI Media Impact | $50,000 |
| La Amistad Foundation | $50,000 |
| Mindful Birthing & Parenting Foundation | $43,400 |
| Coalition for the Homeless | $38,000 |
| Hope Community Center | $37,500 |
| Harbor House | $35,000 |
| Transition House | $35,000 |
| Food Well Alliance | $35,000 |
| Celebrity Series of Boston Inc | $31,500 |
| Shepherds' Hope | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $566k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
125 repeat relationships — 83 still active in FY2024, 42 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $271k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
IPAS8× · 2017–2024 · $581k · revenue +15%- LALA AMISTAD FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $280k · revenue +15%
- DHDAVE'S HOUSE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +140%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2021–2023 · $11k
- HCHorizon Community in Prisonsone grant, 2017 · $10k
- EUEMORY UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.
Central square theater, the oldest female-led theater organization in greater boston, is an innovator in the non-profit arts field in collaborative leadership. cst engages over 35,000 people annually through live performance, rigorous…
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Care Center for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Minyan Oneg Shabbat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 144 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IPAS ↗
- Who funds ENGENDERHEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds PCI-MEDIA IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds LA AMISTAD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DAVE'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSITION HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Harbor House of Central Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD'S HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CELEBRITY SERIES OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds MSI US ↗
- Who funds HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC ↗
- Who funds Health Care Center For The Homeless Inc ↗
- Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds TREES ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds The Food Project Inc ↗
- Who funds ROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
- Who funds Mindful Birthing and Parenting Foundation ↗
- Who funds Birds Georgia Corporation ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
- Who funds FOOD WELL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds BOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ACCESS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Restoration Network ↗
- Who funds COURAGEOUS SAILING CENTER FOR YOUTH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Central Florida Foundation · AEC Trust · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Universal Orlando Foundation Inc · The Richard C Munroe Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John and Golda Cohen Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Florida Trail Association Inc — 100% of income from government
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Transition House Inc — 39% of income from government
- Health Care Center for the Homeless Inc — 34% of income from government
- Harbor House of Central Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
- Courageous Sailing Center for Youth Inc — 10% of income from government
- Boston Community Pediatrics Inc — 10% of income from government
- Adamah Inc — 10% of income from government
- De Novo Center for Justice and Healing — 9% of income from government
- Lower Cape Outreach Councilinc — 6% of income from government
- World Music Inc — 5% of income from government
- Homeless Prevention Council Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Celebrity Series of Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Community Legal Services of Mid-Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
- Orleans Conservation Trust — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/a Zoo New England — 2% of income from government
- Brookline Arts Center — 2% of income from government
- Bay State Performing Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Brookline Teen Center — 0% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Science — 0% of income from government
- Coolidge Corner Theatre Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Hope Community Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to John and Golda Cohen Trust?
Find your warmest path to John and Golda Cohen Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.